These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38823680)
1. Comparison of a Novel Head-Mounted Objective Auto-perimetry (Gaze Analyzing Perimeter) and Humphrey Field Analyzer. Miyake M; Mori Y; Wada S; Yamada K; Shiraishi R; Numa S; Suda K; Kameda T; Ikeda H; Akagi T; Aibara T; Tamura H; Tsujikawa A Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2024; 7(5):445-453. PubMed ID: 38823680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multicenter Comparison of the Toronto Portable Perimeter with the Humphrey Field Analyzer: A Pilot Study. Ahmed Y; Pereira A; Bowden S; Shi RB; Li Y; Ahmed IIK; Arshinoff SA Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2022; 5(2):146-159. PubMed ID: 34358734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from a Tablet Perimeter, Smart Visual Function Analyzer, and Humphrey Field Analyzer. Kang J; De Arrigunaga S; Freeman SE; Zhao Y; Lin M; Liebman DL; Roldan AM; Kim JA; Chang DS; Friedman DS; Elze T Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(5):509-520. PubMed ID: 36918066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing a head-mounted virtual reality perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer for visual field testing in healthy and glaucoma patients. Phu J; Wang H; Kalloniatis M Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Jan; 44(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 37803502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing the Performance of Compass Perimetry With Humphrey Field Analyzer in Eyes With Glaucoma. Rao HL; Raveendran S; James V; Dasari S; Palakurthy M; Reddy HB; Pradhan ZS; Rao DA; Puttaiah NK; Devi S J Glaucoma; 2017 Mar; 26(3):292-297. PubMed ID: 27977480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the Performance of a Novel, Smartphone-based, Head-mounted Perimeter (GearVision) With the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Pradhan ZS; Sircar T; Agrawal H; Rao HL; Bopardikar A; Devi S; Tiwari VN J Glaucoma; 2021 Apr; 30(4):e146-e152. PubMed ID: 33596021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Advanced Vision Analyzer-Virtual Reality Perimeter: Device Validation, Functional Correlation and Comparison with Humphrey Field Analyzer. Narang P; Agarwal A; Srinivasan M; Agarwal A Ophthalmol Sci; 2021 Jun; 1(2):100035. PubMed ID: 36249304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perimetric Comparison Between the IMOvifa and Humphrey Field Analyzer. Nishida T; Eslani M; Weinreb RN; Arias J; Vasile C; Mohammadzadeh V; Moghimi S J Glaucoma; 2023 Feb; 32(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 36223309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Comparison between the Compass Fundus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Montesano G; Bryan SR; Crabb DP; Fogagnolo P; Oddone F; McKendrick AM; Turpin A; Lanzetta P; Perdicchi A; Johnson CA; Garway-Heath DF; Brusini P; Rossetti LM Ophthalmology; 2019 Feb; 126(2):242-251. PubMed ID: 30114416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative Analysis of 10-2 Test on Advanced Vision Analyzer and Humphrey Perimeter in Glaucoma. Narang P; Agarwal A; Agarwal A; Narang R; Sundaramoorthy L Ophthalmol Sci; 2023 Jun; 3(2):100264. PubMed ID: 36846107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measuring Visual Fields in Children With Glaucoma Using a Portable Tablet. Gupta V; Kong GXY; Singh A; Panigrahi A; Gupta S; Prea S; Vingrys AJ Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 May; 13(5):10. PubMed ID: 38743410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison and Correlation of Retinal Sensitivity Between Microperimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Low-tension Glaucoma. Tepelus TC; Song S; Nittala MG; Nassisi M; Sadda SR; Chopra V J Glaucoma; 2020 Oct; 29(10):975-980. PubMed ID: 32649448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the visual field test of Glaufield Lite with Humphrey Field Analyser. Behera G; Waghmare SV; Ramasamy A Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Feb; 43(2):557-565. PubMed ID: 35947251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing a Head-Mounted Smartphone Visual Field Analyzer to Standard Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma: A Prospective Study. Wang SK; Tran EM; Yan W; Kosaraju R; Sun Y; Chang RT J Glaucoma; 2024 Oct; 33(10):742-747. PubMed ID: 38884623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How does glaucoma look?: patient perception of visual field loss. Crabb DP; Smith ND; Glen FC; Burton R; Garway-Heath DF Ophthalmology; 2013 Jun; 120(6):1120-6. PubMed ID: 23415421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effect of Testing Reliability on Visual Field Sensitivity in Normal Eyes: The Singapore Chinese Eye Study. Tan NYQ; Tham YC; Koh V; Nguyen DQ; Cheung CY; Aung T; Wong TY; Cheng CY Ophthalmology; 2018 Jan; 125(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 28863943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of a Head-mounted Virtual Reality Visual Field Screening Device. Mees L; Upadhyaya S; Kumar P; Kotawala S; Haran S; Rajasekar S; Friedman DS; Venkatesh R J Glaucoma; 2020 Feb; 29(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 31790067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Humphrey Field Analyzer and imo visual field test results in patients with glaucoma and pseudo-fixation loss. Goukon H; Hirasawa K; Kasahara M; Matsumura K; Shoji N PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224711. PubMed ID: 31697732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Compass and Humphrey perimeters in detecting glaucomatous defects. Fogagnolo P; Modarelli A; Oddone F; Digiuni M; Montesano G; Orzalesi N; Rossetti L Eur J Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 26(6):598-606. PubMed ID: 27375066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of Remote Training, At-Home Testing, and Test-Retest Variability of a Novel Test for Clustered Virtual Reality Perimetry. Chia ZK; Kong AW; Turner ML; Saifee M; Damato BE; Backus BT; Blaha JJ; Schuman JS; Deiner MS; Ou Y Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2024; 7(2):139-147. PubMed ID: 37619815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]