129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38825846)
41. Greatly Enhanced Removal of Volatile Organic Carcinogens by a Genetically Modified Houseplant, Pothos Ivy ( Epipremnum aureum) Expressing the Mammalian Cytochrome P450 2e1 Gene.
Zhang L; Routsong R; Strand SE
Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Jan; 53(1):325-331. PubMed ID: 30565461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Formaldehyde and volatile organic compounds in Hong Kong homes: concentrations and impact factors.
Guo H; Kwok NH; Cheng HR; Lee SC; Hung WT; Li YS
Indoor Air; 2009 Jun; 19(3):206-17. PubMed ID: 19220507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Mitigation of indoor air pollutants using Areca palm potted plants in real-life settings.
Bhargava B; Malhotra S; Chandel A; Rakwal A; Kashwap RR; Kumar S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Feb; 28(7):8898-8906. PubMed ID: 33074430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Pot study using Chlorophytum comosum plants to biomonitor PAH levels in domestic kitchens.
Hubai K; Kováts N; Eck-Varanka B; Teke G
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(18):51932-51941. PubMed ID: 36813942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Preparation of a Novel Formaldehyde-Free Impregnated Decorative Paper Containing MnO
Liu R; Liang M; Xu J; Sun Y; Long L; Zhu L; Lv B; Yang B; Ni Y
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2023 Jul; 15(29):34941-34955. PubMed ID: 37462122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Uptake of aldehydes and ketones at typical indoor concentrations by houseplants.
Tani A; Hewitt CN
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Nov; 43(21):8338-43. PubMed ID: 19924966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Indoor air formaldehyde (HCHO) pollution of urban coach cabins.
Qin D; Guo B; Zhou J; Cheng H; Chen X
Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):332. PubMed ID: 31941990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Evaluating In Silico the Potential Health and Environmental Benefits of Houseplant Volatile Organic Compounds for an Emerging 'Indoor Forest Bathing' Approach.
Roviello V; Scognamiglio PL; Caruso U; Vicidomini C; Roviello GN
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Dec; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 35010532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Foliar uptake and translocation of formaldehyde with Bracket plants (Chlorophytum comosum).
Su Y; Liang Y
J Hazard Mater; 2015 Jun; 291():120-8. PubMed ID: 25771217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Colorimetric monitoring of formaldehyde in indoor environment using built-in camera on mobile phone.
Sekine Y; Katori R; Tsuda Y; Kitahara T
Environ Technol; 2016; 37(13):1647-55. PubMed ID: 26616679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparative analysis of formaldehyde and toluene sorption on indoor floorings and consequence on Indoor Air Quality.
Plaisance H; Mocho P; Desauziers V
Indoor Air; 2020 Nov; 30(6):1256-1267. PubMed ID: 32506531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The influence of different light quality and benzene on gene expression and benzene degradation of Chlorophytum comosum.
Setsungnern A; Treesubsuntorn C; Thiravetyan P
Plant Physiol Biochem; 2017 Nov; 120():95-102. PubMed ID: 28992544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Formaldehyde emission behavior of building materials: on-site measurements and modeling approach to predict indoor air pollution.
Bourdin D; Mocho P; Desauziers V; Plaisance H
J Hazard Mater; 2014 Sep; 280():164-73. PubMed ID: 25151239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A systematic review on mitigation of common indoor air pollutants using plant-based methods: a phytoremediation approach.
Kumar R; Verma V; Thakur M; Singh G; Bhargava B
Air Qual Atmos Health; 2023 Mar; ():1-27. PubMed ID: 37359395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Characterisation of urban inhalation exposures to benzene, formaldehyde and acetaldehyde in the European Union: comparison of measured and modelled exposure data.
Bruinen de Bruin Y; Koistinen K; Kephalopoulos S; Geiss O; Tirendi S; Kotzias D
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 Jul; 15(5):417-30. PubMed ID: 18491156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Efficiency and mechanism of formaldehyde removal from air by two wild plants;
Zhao S; Su Y; Liang H
J Environ Health Sci Eng; 2019 Jun; 17(1):141-150. PubMed ID: 31321042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparative zinc tolerance and phytoremediation potential of four biofuel plant species.
Amin H; Ahmed Arain B; Jahangir TM; Abbasi AR; Abbasi MS; Amin F
Int J Phytoremediation; 2023; 25(8):1014-1028. PubMed ID: 36134746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Investigation of simultaneous volatile organic compound removal by indoor plants using solid phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Peterson G; Jones T; Rispoli D; Haddadi S; Niri V
RSC Adv; 2023 Sep; 13(38):26896-26906. PubMed ID: 37692358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Volatile organic compound concentrations, emission rates, and source apportionment in newly-built apartments at pre-occupancy stage.
Shin SH; Jo WK
Chemosphere; 2012 Oct; 89(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 22698369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of formaldehyde emission from building finishing materials at various temperatures in under heating system; ONDOL.
Kim S; Kim HJ
Indoor Air; 2005 Oct; 15(5):317-25. PubMed ID: 16108904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]