These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3882619)

  • 1. Comparison of an ionic with a nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography. Results of a multicenter trial.
    Bettmann MA; Higgins CB
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S70-4. PubMed ID: 3882619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cardioangiography in man using iohexol and meglumine-Na diatrizoate. A comparison of hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects.
    Higgins CB; Mancini GB; Bloomquist JN; Shaw D
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():111-4. PubMed ID: 6591736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of iohexol and meglumine-Na diatrizoate in cerebral angiography.
    Kido DK; Morris TW; Ekholm S; Plassche W; Erickson JL
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():142-6. PubMed ID: 6591738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adult peripheral angiography. Results from four North American randomized clinical trials of ionic media versus iohexol.
    Wolf GL
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():166-70. PubMed ID: 6382932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol): advantages over standard ionic agents.
    Mancini GB; Bloomquist JN; Bhargava V; Stein JB; Lew W; Slutsky RA; Shabetai R; Higgins CB
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 Apr; 51(7):1218-22. PubMed ID: 6837464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adult peripheral angiography. Results from four North American randomized clinical trials of ionic media vs. iohexol.
    Wolf GL
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S108-11. PubMed ID: 3882612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hemodynamic effects of contrast media during coronary angiography: a comparison of three nonionic agents to Hypaque-76.
    Piao ZE; Murdock DK; Hwang MH; Raymond RM; Scanlon PJ
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1988; 14(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 3349517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrast agents for cardiac angiography: effects of a nonionic agent vs. a standard ionic agent.
    Bettmann MA; Bourdillon PD; Barry WH; Brush KA; Levin DC
    Radiology; 1984 Dec; 153(3):583-7. PubMed ID: 6387783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of intravenous administration of a new nonionic dimeric contrast medium on the coronary circulation. Comparison with monomeric ionic and nonionic media.
    Lanzer P; Dean PB; Lipton MJ; Sievers R; Botvinick E; Higgins CB
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Oct; 20(7):746-50. PubMed ID: 4066245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Double-blind study of a new nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography.
    Reagan K; Bettman MA; Finkelstein J; Ganz P; Grassi CJ
    Radiology; 1988 May; 167(2):409-13. PubMed ID: 3282261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
    Sackett JF; Bergsjordet B; Seeger JF; Kieffer SA
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():81-4. PubMed ID: 6382939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cardiotolerance of iohexol. Survey of experimental evidence.
    Higgins CB
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S65-9. PubMed ID: 3882618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of iohexol with meglumine-Na diatrizoate for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Seeger JF; Carmody RF; Smith JR; Horsley WW; Criss E
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():85-8. PubMed ID: 6382940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Iohexol in urography. Survey and present state.
    Ekelund L
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():25-9. PubMed ID: 6206689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
    Sackett JF; Bergsjordet B; Seeger JF; Cacayorin ED
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 2579044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents in cardiac catheterization: the effects of ventriculography and coronary arteriography on hemodynamics, electrocardiography, and serum creatinine.
    Cooper MW; Reed PJ
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 Apr; 22(4):267-77. PubMed ID: 1781822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical superiority of a new nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol) for cardiac angiography.
    Gertz EW; Wisneski JA; Chiu D; Akin JR; Hu C
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Feb; 5(2 Pt 1):250-8. PubMed ID: 3881496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Iohexol vs. diatrizoate. A comparative study in intravenous urography.
    Rankin RN; Eng FW
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S112-4. PubMed ID: 3972525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Iohexol in coronary angiography. A comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast media.
    Selin K; Emanuelsson H; Renaa T
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():115-20. PubMed ID: 6382928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Iohexol in cardioangiography. Survey and present state.
    Tylén U
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():94-100. PubMed ID: 6382942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.