These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38826206)

  • 1. Accuracy of dipole source reconstruction in the 3-layer BEM model against the 5-layer BEM-FMM model.
    Nuñez Ponasso G; McSweeney RC; Wartman WA; Lai P; Haueisen J; Maess B; Knösche TR; Weise K; Noetscher GM; Raij T; Makaroff SN
    bioRxiv; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38826206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An adaptive h-refinement method for the boundary element fast multipole method for quasi-static electromagnetic modeling.
    Wartman WA; Weise K; Rachh M; Morales L; Deng ZD; Nummenmaa A; Makaroff SN
    Phys Med Biol; 2024 Feb; 69(5):. PubMed ID: 38316038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Adaptive H-Refinement Method for the Boundary Element Fast Multipole Method for Quasi-static Electromagnetic Modeling.
    Wartman WA; Weise K; Rachh M; Morales L; Deng ZD; Nummenmaa A; Makaroff SN
    bioRxiv; 2023 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 37645957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative performance of the finite element method and the boundary element fast multipole method for problems mimicking transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).
    Htet AT; Saturnino GB; Burnham EH; Noetscher GM; Nummenmaa A; Makarov SN
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Apr; 16(2):024001. PubMed ID: 30605893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fast and Accurate EEG/MEG BEM-Based Forward Problem Solution for High-Resolution Head Models.
    Wartman WA; Nuñez Ponasso G; Qi Z; Haueisen J; Maess B; Knösche TR; Weise K; Noetscher GM; Raij T; Makaroff SN
    bioRxiv; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38895215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of volume conductor and source models to localize epileptic foci.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 24(2):101-19. PubMed ID: 17414966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of dipole reconstruction accuracy with spherical and realistic head models in MEG.
    Crouzeix A; Yvert B; Bertrand O; Pernier J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 110(12):2176-88. PubMed ID: 10616124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A standardized boundary element method volume conductor model.
    Fuchs M; Kastner J; Wagner M; Hawes S; Ebersole JS
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 May; 113(5):702-12. PubMed ID: 11976050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Boundary Element Fast Multipole Method for Enhanced Modeling of Neurophysiological Recordings.
    Makarov SN; Hamalainen M; Okada Y; Noetscher GM; Ahveninen J; Nummenmaa A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2021 Jan; 68(1):308-318. PubMed ID: 32746015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Boundary element method volume conductor models for EEG source reconstruction.
    Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Aug; 112(8):1400-7. PubMed ID: 11459679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validating the boundary element method for forward and inverse EEG computations in the presence of a hole in the skull.
    Oostenveld R; Oostendorp TF
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 Nov; 17(3):179-92. PubMed ID: 12391571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Boundary element fast multipole method for modeling electrical brain stimulation with voltage and current electrodes.
    Makarov SN; Golestanirad L; Wartman WA; Nguyen BT; Noetscher GM; Ahveninen JP; Fujimoto K; Weise K; Nummenmaa AR
    J Neural Eng; 2021 Aug; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 34311449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Source reconstruction of mesial-temporal epileptiform activity: comparison of inverse techniques.
    Waberski TD; Gobbelé R; Herrendorf G; Steinhoff BJ; Kolle R; Fuchs M; Paulus W; Buchner H
    Epilepsia; 2000 Dec; 41(12):1574-83. PubMed ID: 11114216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of forward model errors on EEG source localization.
    Akalin Acar Z; Makeig S
    Brain Topogr; 2013 Jul; 26(3):378-96. PubMed ID: 23355112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A fast direct solver for surface-based whole-head modeling of transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Makaroff SN; Qi Z; Rachh M; Wartman WA; Weise K; Noetscher GM; Daneshzand M; Deng ZD; Greengard L; Nummenmaa AR
    Res Sq; 2023 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 37503106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of dipole position, orientation and noise on the accuracy of EEG source localization.
    Whittingstall K; Stroink G; Gates L; Connolly JF; Finley A
    Biomed Eng Online; 2003 Jun; 2():14. PubMed ID: 12807534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A survey on integral equations for bioelectric modeling.
    Ponasso GN
    Phys Med Biol; 2024 Aug; 69(17):. PubMed ID: 39042098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A hybrid boundary element-finite element approach for solving the EEG forward problem in brain modeling.
    Dayarian N; Khadem A
    Front Syst Neurosci; 2024; 18():1327674. PubMed ID: 38764980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.