These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38827545)
21. Cardiac valvular surgery in dialysis patients: comparison of surgical outcome for mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves. Umezu K; Saito S; Yamazaki K; Kawai A; Kurosawa H Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Apr; 57(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 19367452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Implantation of mitral, aortic, and tricuspid bioprostheses due to infective endocarditis with necessary reimplantation of the bioprosthetic aortic valve. Danielecki C; Bugajski P; Olszewski R; Greberski K; Kalawski R Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol; 2016 Sep; 13(3):248-250. PubMed ID: 27785140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bioprosthetic vs mechanical mitral valve replacement for infective endocarditis in patients aged 50 to 69 years. Hu X; Jiang W; Xie M; Guo R; Yim WY; Dong N; Wang Y Clin Cardiol; 2020 Oct; 43(10):1093-1099. PubMed ID: 32497339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. What type of valve is most appropriate for osteogenesis imperfecta patients? Dimitrakakis G; Challoumas D; von Oppell UO Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2014 Sep; 19(3):499-504. PubMed ID: 24876219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Is there an advantage in using homografts in patients with acute infective endocarditis of the aortic valve? Gulbins H; Kilian E; Roth S; Uhlig A; Kreuzer E; Reichart B J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jul; 11(4):492-7. PubMed ID: 12150295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bioprosthetic versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in the elderly. Davis EA; Greene PS; Cameron DE; Gott VI; Laschinger JC; Stuart RS; Sussman MS; Watkins L; Baumgartner WA Circulation; 1996 Nov; 94(9 Suppl):II121-5. PubMed ID: 8901731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Homografts for mitral valve replacement in florid endocarditis--an alternative to prosthetic replacement]. Gulbins H; Kreuzer E; Haushofer M; Uhlig A; Reichart B Z Kardiol; 1999 May; 88(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 10413859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements. Isaacs AJ; Shuhaiber J; Salemi A; Isom OW; Sedrakyan A J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 May; 149(5):1262-9.e3. PubMed ID: 25791947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Infective endocarditis after surgical aortic or mitral valve replacement: A nationwide population-based study. Lee HA; Wu VC; Chan YS; Cheng YT; Lee JK; Chu PH; Chen SW J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Oct; 166(4):1056-1068.e7. PubMed ID: 35086668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A guide to fluoroscopic identification and design of bioprosthetic valves: a reference for valve-in-valve procedure. Bapat V; Mydin I; Chadalavada S; Tehrani H; Attia R; Thomas M Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Apr; 81(5):853-61. PubMed ID: 22431472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Stentless aortic valves as an alternative to homografts for valve replacement in active infective endocarditis complicated by ring abscess. Siniawski H; Lehmkuhl H; Weng Y; Pasic M; Yankah C; Hoffmann M; Behnke I; Hetzer R Ann Thorac Surg; 2003 Mar; 75(3):803-8; discussion 808. PubMed ID: 12645697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of Quality of Life Perceived by Patients with Bioprosthetic versus Mechanical Valves after Composite Aortic Root Replacement. Repack A; Ziganshin BA; Elefteriades JA; Mukherjee SK Cardiology; 2016; 133(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 26389590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]