129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38830014)
41. Significance of Cephalometric Radiograph in Orthodontic Treatment Plan Decision.
Helal NM; Basri OA; Baeshen HA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jul; 20(7):789-793. PubMed ID: 31597797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Reliability and validity of the Digigraph 100 in orthodontic diagnosis.
Doll GM; Zentner A; Krummenauer F; Gärtner H
J Orofac Orthop; 2001 Mar; 62(2):116-32. PubMed ID: 11304928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Artificial Intelligence Systems Assisting in the Assessment of the Course and Retention of Orthodontic Treatment.
Strunga M; Urban R; Surovková J; Thurzo A
Healthcare (Basel); 2023 Feb; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 36900687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The effect of scan and patient parameters on the diagnostic performance of AI for detecting coronary stenosis on coronary CT angiography.
Jonas RA; Barkovich E; Choi AD; Griffin WF; Riess J; Marques H; Chang HJ; Choi JH; Doh JH; Her AY; Koo BK; Nam CW; Park HB; Shin SH; Cole J; Gimelli A; Khan MA; Lu B; Gao Y; Nabi F; Nakazato R; Schoepf UJ; Driessen RS; Bom MJ; Thompson RC; Jang JJ; Ridner M; Rowan C; Avelar E; Généreux P; Knaapen P; de Waard GA; Pontone G; Andreini D; Guglielmo M; Al-Mallah MH; Jennings RS; Crabtree TR; Earls JP
Clin Imaging; 2022 Apr; 84():149-158. PubMed ID: 35217284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Cephalometric Variables Prediction from Lateral Photographs Between Different Skeletal Patterns Using Regression Artificial Neural Networks.
Ali SM; Saloom HF; Tawfeeq MA
Turk J Orthod; 2022 Jun; 35(2):101-111. PubMed ID: 35788434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Automatic 3-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmarking via Deep Learning.
Dot G; Schouman T; Chang S; Rafflenbeul F; Kerbrat A; Rouch P; Gajny L
J Dent Res; 2022 Oct; 101(11):1380-1387. PubMed ID: 35982646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. What is the current state of artificial intelligence applications in dentistry and orthodontics?
Fawaz P; Sayegh PE; Vannet BV
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Oct; 124(5):101524. PubMed ID: 37270174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Face the Future-Artificial Intelligence in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.
Miragall MF; Knoedler S; Kauke-Navarro M; Saadoun R; Grabenhorst A; Grill FD; Ritschl LM; Fichter AM; Safi AF; Knoedler L
J Clin Med; 2023 Oct; 12(21):. PubMed ID: 37959310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Effectiveness of Human-Artificial Intelligence Collaboration in Cephalometric Landmark Detection.
Le VNT; Kang J; Oh IS; Kim JG; Yang YM; Lee DW
J Pers Med; 2022 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 35330386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Assessing the Impact of AI-Enhanced Diagnostic Tools on the Treatment Planning of Orthodontic Cases: An RCT.
Gaonkar P; Mohammed I; Ribin M; Kumar DC; Thomas PA; Saini R
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2024 Apr; 16(Suppl 2):S1798-S1800. PubMed ID: 38882868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Human examination and artificial intelligence in cephalometric landmark detection-is AI ready to take over?
Indermun S; Shaik S; Nyirenda C; Johannes K; Mulder R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Sep; 52(6):20220362. PubMed ID: 37427581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Influence of lateral cephalometric radiographs on extraction decision in skeletal class I patients.
Dinçer B; Yetkiner E; Aras I; Attin T; Attin R
Head Face Med; 2013 Dec; 9():36. PubMed ID: 24304887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks:
Hwang HW; Park JH; Moon JH; Yu Y; Kim H; Her SB; Srinivasan G; Aljanabi MNA; Donatelli RE; Lee SJ
Angle Orthod; 2020 Jan; 90(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 31335162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracings.
Sayinsu K; Isik F; Trakyali G; Arun T
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 17290023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICAL PRACTICE: REGULATIVE ISSUES AND PERSPECTIVES.
Pashkov VM; Harkusha AO; Harkusha YO
Wiad Lek; 2020; 73(12 cz 2):2722-2727. PubMed ID: 33611272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A fully automated artificial intelligence-driven software for planning of transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Toggweiler S; Wyler von Ballmoos MC; Moccetti F; Douverny A; Wolfrum M; Imamoglu Z; Mohler A; Gülan U; Kim WK
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38467531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparative study on the results of orthodontic diagnostics by using algorithms generated by Artificial Intelligence and simple algorithms.
Hack M; Drăgulin B; Hack L; ElSaafin M; Dumitrescu I; Stan D; Păcurar M
Med Pharm Rep; 2024 Apr; 97(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 38746029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Machine learning and orthodontics, current trends and the future opportunities: A scoping review.
Mohammad-Rahimi H; Nadimi M; Rohban MH; Shamsoddin E; Lee VY; Motamedian SR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Aug; 160(2):170-192.e4. PubMed ID: 34103190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study.
Ghoneima A; Albarakati S; Baysal A; Uysal T; Kula K
Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 23304973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Clinical Use of a Commercial Artificial Intelligence-Based Software for Autocontouring in Radiation Therapy: Geometric Performance and Dosimetric Impact.
Hoque SMH; Pirrone G; Matrone F; Donofrio A; Fanetti G; Caroli A; Rista RS; Bortolus R; Avanzo M; Drigo A; Chiovati P
Cancers (Basel); 2023 Dec; 15(24):. PubMed ID: 38136281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
