These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38830014)

  • 61. Deep convolutional neural network-based skeletal classification of cephalometric image compared with automated-tracing software.
    Kim HJ; Kim KD; Kim DH
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):11659. PubMed ID: 35804075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Comparing a Fully Automated Cephalometric Tracing Method to a Manual Tracing Method for Orthodontic Diagnosis.
    Tsolakis IA; Tsolakis AI; Elshebiny T; Matthaios S; Palomo JM
    J Clin Med; 2022 Nov; 11(22):. PubMed ID: 36431331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Evaluation of automated cephalometric analysis based on the latest deep learning method.
    Hwang HW; Moon JH; Kim MG; Donatelli RE; Lee SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2021 May; 91(3):329-335. PubMed ID: 33434275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Spine surgeon versus AI algorithm full-length radiographic measurements: a validation study of complex adult spinal deformity patients.
    Haselhuhn JJ; Soriano PBO; Grover P; Dreischarf M; Odland K; Hendrickson NR; Jones KE; Martin CT; Sembrano JN; Polly DW
    Spine Deform; 2024 May; 12(3):755-761. PubMed ID: 38336942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Biparametric prostate MRI: impact of a deep learning-based software and of quantitative ADC values on the inter-reader agreement of experienced and inexperienced readers.
    Cipollari S; Pecoraro M; Forookhi A; Laschena L; Bicchetti M; Messina E; Lucciola S; Catalano C; Panebianco V
    Radiol Med; 2022 Nov; 127(11):1245-1253. PubMed ID: 36114928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Clinical applicability of automated cephalometric landmark identification: Part I-Patient-related identification errors.
    Tanikawa C; Lee C; Lim J; Oka A; Yamashiro T
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Dec; 24 Suppl 2():43-52. PubMed ID: 34021976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Interobserver variability among expert readers quantifying plaque volume and plaque characteristics on coronary CT angiography: a CLARIFY trial sub-study.
    Jonas RA; Weerakoon S; Fisher R; Griffin WF; Kumar V; Rahban H; Marques H; Karlsberg RP; Jennings RS; Crabtree TR; Choi AD; Earls JP
    Clin Imaging; 2022 Nov; 91():19-25. PubMed ID: 35986973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Precision of orthodontic cephalometric measurements on ultra low dose-low dose CBCT reconstructed cephalograms.
    van Bunningen RH; Dijkstra PU; Dieters A; van der Meer WJ; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Ren Y
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Feb; 26(2):1543-1550. PubMed ID: 34453209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Comparison of a tridimensional cephalometric analysis performed on 3T-MRI compared with CBCT: a pilot study in adults.
    Maspero C; Abate A; Bellincioni F; Cavagnetto D; Lanteri V; Costa A; Farronato M
    Prog Orthod; 2019 Oct; 20(1):40. PubMed ID: 31631241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Surgery-First Orthognathic Approach to Correct Facial Asymmetry: Artificial Intelligence-Based Cephalometric Analysis.
    Choi JW; Park H; Kim B S IH; Kim N; Kwon SM; Lee JY
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Mar; 149(3):496e-499e. PubMed ID: 35196690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Artificial Intelligence (AI) versus POCUS Expert: A Validation Study of Three Automatic AI-Based, Real-Time, Hemodynamic Echocardiographic Assessment Tools.
    Gohar E; Herling A; Mazuz M; Tsaban G; Gat T; Kobal S; Fuchs L
    J Clin Med; 2023 Feb; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 36835888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Reducing echocardiographic examination time through routine use of fully automated software: a comparative study of measurement and report creation time.
    Hirata Y; Nomura Y; Saijo Y; Sata M; Kusunose K
    J Echocardiogr; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38308797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Machine learning-based decision support system for orthognathic diagnosis and treatment planning.
    Du W; Bi W; Liu Y; Zhu Z; Tai Y; Luo E
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):286. PubMed ID: 38419015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Artificial intelligence assists operators in real-time detection of focal liver lesions during ultrasound: A randomized controlled study.
    Tiyarattanachai T; Apiparakoon T; Chaichuen O; Sukcharoen S; Yimsawad S; Jangsirikul S; Chaikajornwat J; Siriwong N; Burana C; Siritaweechai N; Atipas K; Assawamasbunlue N; Tovichayathamrong P; Obcheuythed P; Somvanapanich P; Geratikornsupuk N; Anukulkarnkusol N; Sarakul P; Tanpowpong N; Pinjaroen N; Kerr SJ; Rerknimitr R; Marukatat S; Chaiteerakij R
    Eur J Radiol; 2023 Aug; 165():110932. PubMed ID: 37390663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Artificial intelligence (AI) versus expert: A comparison of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT-VTI) assessment between ICU doctors and an AI tool.
    Zhai S; Wang H; Sun L; Zhang B; Huo F; Qiu S; Wu X; Ma J; Wu Y; Duan J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 23(8):e13724. PubMed ID: 35816461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Development of artificial intelligence tools for invasive Doppler-based coronary microvascular assessment.
    Seligman H; Patel SB; Alloula A; Howard JP; Cook CM; Ahmad Y; de Waard GA; Pinto ME; van de Hoef TP; Rahman H; Kelshiker MA; Rajkumar CA; Foley M; Nowbar AN; Mehta S; Toulemonde M; Tang MX; Al-Lamee R; Sen S; Cole G; Nijjer S; Escaned J; Van Royen N; Francis DP; Shun-Shin MJ; Petraco R
    Eur Heart J Digit Health; 2023 Aug; 4(4):291-301. PubMed ID: 37538145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance.
    Dratsch T; Chen X; Rezazade Mehrizi M; Kloeckner R; Mähringer-Kunz A; Püsken M; Baeßler B; Sauer S; Maintz D; Pinto Dos Santos D
    Radiology; 2023 May; 307(4):e222176. PubMed ID: 37129490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. A comparative evaluation of concordance and speed between smartphone app-based and artificial intelligence web-based cephalometric tracing software with the manual tracing method: A cross-sectional study.
    Gupta S; Shetty S; Natarajan S; Nambiar S; Mv A; Agarwal S
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e11-e17. PubMed ID: 38314342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The use and performance of artificial intelligence applications in dental and maxillofacial radiology: A systematic review.
    Hung K; Montalvao C; Tanaka R; Kawai T; Bornstein MM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Jan; 49(1):20190107. PubMed ID: 31386555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Comparison of cephalometric measurements between conventional and automatic cephalometric analysis using convolutional neural network.
    Jeon S; Lee KC
    Prog Orthod; 2021 May; 22(1):14. PubMed ID: 34056670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.