117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38830805)
1. Effects of Rock Type and Food Availability on Bioerosion by the Purple Sea Urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus.
Troha LU; Narvaez CA; Russell MP
Integr Comp Biol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38830805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bioerosion by pit-forming, temperate-reef sea urchins: History, rates and broader implications.
Russell MP; Gibbs VK; Duwan E
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0191278. PubMed ID: 29466357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Density-dependent feedbacks, hysteresis, and demography of overgrazing sea urchins.
Ling SD; Kriegisch N; Woolley B; Reeves SE
Ecology; 2019 Feb; 100(2):e02577. PubMed ID: 30707451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experiments reveal limited top-down control of key herbivores in southern California kelp forests.
Dunn RP; Hovel KA
Ecology; 2019 Mar; 100(3):e02625. PubMed ID: 30648729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Drift-kelp suppresses foraging movement of overgrazing sea urchins.
Kriegisch N; Reeves SE; Flukes EB; Johnson CR; Ling SD
Oecologia; 2019 Jul; 190(3):665-677. PubMed ID: 31250188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sunflower sea star predation on urchins can facilitate kelp forest recovery.
Galloway AWE; Gravem SA; Kobelt JN; Heady WN; Okamoto DK; Sivitilli DM; Saccomanno VR; Hodin J; Whippo R
Proc Biol Sci; 2023 Feb; 290(1993):20221897. PubMed ID: 36809801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Energetic context determines the effects of multiple upwelling-associated stressors on sea urchin performance.
Murie KA; Bourdeau PE
Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):11313. PubMed ID: 34059741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of removing sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis): Stability of the barren state and succession of kelp forest recovery in the east Atlantic.
Leinaas HP; Christie H
Oecologia; 1996 Mar; 105(4):524-536. PubMed ID: 28307146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adhesive plasticity among populations of purple sea urchin (
Stark AY; Narvaez CA; Russell MP
J Exp Biol; 2020 Aug; 223(Pt 15):. PubMed ID: 32587066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conspecific cues, not starvation, mediate barren urchin response to predation risk.
Knight CJ; Dunn RP; Long JD
Oecologia; 2022 Aug; 199(4):859-869. PubMed ID: 35907124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of five southern California macroalgal diets on consumption, growth, and gonad weight, in the purple sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus.
Foster MC; Byrnes JE; Reed DC
PeerJ; 2015; 3():e719. PubMed ID: 25653904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ecological role of purple sea urchins.
Pearse JS
Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5801):940-1. PubMed ID: 17095690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The present is the key to the past: linking regime shifts in kelp beds to the distribution of deep-living sea urchins.
Filbee-Dexter K; Scheibling RE
Ecology; 2017 Jan; 98(1):253-264. PubMed ID: 28052391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental evaluation of the anti-attachment effect of microalgal mats on grazing activity of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus nudus in oscillating flows.
Kawamata S
J Exp Biol; 2012 May; 215(Pt 9):1464-71. PubMed ID: 22496282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increased macroalgal abundance following mass mortalities of sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) along the Atlantic coast of Nova Scotia.
Scheibling R
Oecologia; 1986 Jan; 68(2):186-198. PubMed ID: 28310126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Testing the efficacy of sea urchin exclusion methods for restoring kelp.
Sharma R; Swearer SE; Morris RL; Strain EMA
Mar Environ Res; 2021 Aug; 170():105439. PubMed ID: 34365122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phase-Shift Dynamics of Sea Urchin Overgrazing on Nutrified Reefs.
Kriegisch N; Reeves S; Johnson CR; Ling SD
PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0168333. PubMed ID: 28030596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Remnant kelp bed refugia and future phase-shifts under ocean acidification.
Ling SD; Cornwall CE; Tilbrook B; Hurd CL
PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0239136. PubMed ID: 33035224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trophic redundancy and predator size class structure drive differences in kelp forest ecosystem dynamics.
Eisaguirre JH; Eisaguirre JM; Davis K; Carlson PM; Gaines SD; Caselle JE
Ecology; 2020 May; 101(5):e02993. PubMed ID: 32002994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Warmer temperatures reduce the influence of an important keystone predator.
Bonaviri C; Graham M; Gianguzza P; Shears NT
J Anim Ecol; 2017 May; 86(3):490-500. PubMed ID: 28075025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
