These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38831393)

  • 21. Covariate Balancing through Naturally Occurring Strata.
    Alemi F; ElRafey A; Avramovic I
    Health Serv Res; 2018 Feb; 53(1):273-292. PubMed ID: 27976388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Addressing Extreme Propensity Scores in Estimating Counterfactual Survival Functions via the Overlap Weights.
    Cheng C; Li F; Thomas LE; Li FF
    Am J Epidemiol; 2022 May; 191(6):1140-1151. PubMed ID: 35238335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of the E-value in the presence of bias amplification: a simulation study.
    Barrette E; Higuera L; Wherry K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Mar; 24(1):79. PubMed ID: 38539082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Variance estimation of the risk difference when using propensity-score matching and weighting with time-to-event outcomes.
    Cafri G; Austin PC
    Pharm Stat; 2023; 22(5):880-902. PubMed ID: 37258420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Propensity score trimming mitigates bias due to covariate measurement error in inverse probability of treatment weighted analyses: A plasmode simulation.
    Conover MM; Rothman KJ; Stürmer T; Ellis AR; Poole C; Jonsson Funk M
    Stat Med; 2021 Apr; 40(9):2101-2112. PubMed ID: 33622016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparing the performance of propensity score methods in healthcare database studies with rare outcomes.
    Franklin JM; Eddings W; Austin PC; Stuart EA; Schneeweiss S
    Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(12):1946-1963. PubMed ID: 28208229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bias associated with using the estimated propensity score as a regression covariate.
    Hade EM; Lu B
    Stat Med; 2014 Jan; 33(1):74-87. PubMed ID: 23787715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Inverse Probability Weights for Quasicontinuous Ordinal Exposures With a Binary Outcome: Method Comparison and Case Study.
    Sack DE; Shepherd BE; Audet CM; De Schacht C; Samuels LR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2023 Jul; 192(7):1192-1206. PubMed ID: 37067471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Propensity score weighting under limited overlap and model misspecification.
    Zhou Y; Matsouaka RA; Thomas L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Dec; 29(12):3721-3756. PubMed ID: 32693715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of Utilization, Costs, and Quality of Medicaid vs Subsidized Private Health Insurance for Low-Income Adults.
    Allen H; Gordon SH; Lee D; Bhanja A; Sommers BD
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Jan; 4(1):e2032669. PubMed ID: 33399859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Balancing vs modeling approaches to weighting in practice.
    Chattopadhyay A; Hase CH; Zubizarreta JR
    Stat Med; 2020 Oct; 39(24):3227-3254. PubMed ID: 32882755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Should a propensity score model be super? The utility of ensemble procedures for causal adjustment.
    Alam S; Moodie EEM; Stephens DA
    Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(9):1690-1702. PubMed ID: 30586681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The relative ability of different propensity score methods to balance measured covariates between treated and untreated subjects in observational studies.
    Austin PC
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(6):661-77. PubMed ID: 19684288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Propensity score analysis with local balance.
    Li Y; Li L
    Stat Med; 2023 Jul; 42(15):2637-2660. PubMed ID: 37012676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Combining Super Learner with high-dimensional propensity score to improve confounding adjustment: A real-world application in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
    Dhopeshwarkar N; Yang W; Hennessy S; Rhodes JM; Cuker A; Leonard CE
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2024 Jan; 33(1):e5678. PubMed ID: 37609668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Covariate adjustment in subgroup analyses of randomized clinical trials: A propensity score approach.
    Yang S; Li F; Thomas LE; Li F
    Clin Trials; 2021 Oct; 18(5):570-581. PubMed ID: 34269087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bootstrap vs asymptotic variance estimation when using propensity score weighting with continuous and binary outcomes.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2022 Sep; 41(22):4426-4443. PubMed ID: 35841200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating differences in proportions (risk differences or absolute risk reductions) in observational studies.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2137-48. PubMed ID: 20108233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing the performance of the generalized propensity score for estimating the effect of quantitative or continuous exposures on binary outcomes.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(11):1874-1894. PubMed ID: 29508424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. High-dimensional mediation analysis for continuous outcome with confounders using overlap weighting method in observational epigenetic study.
    Hu W; Chen S; Cai J; Yang Y; Yan H; Chen F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Jun; 24(1):125. PubMed ID: 38831262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.