126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38831569)
1. Spatial prioritization for widespread invasive species control: Trade-offs between current impact and future spread.
Carter S; Mills C; Hao Z; Mott R; Hauser CE; White M; Sharples J; Taylor J; Moore JL
Ecol Appl; 2024 Jul; 34(5):e2982. PubMed ID: 38831569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Examining current or future trade-offs for biodiversity conservation in north-eastern Australia.
Reside AE; VanDerWal J; Moilanen A; Graham EM
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172230. PubMed ID: 28222199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Priority threat management of invasive animals to protect biodiversity under climate change.
Firn J; Maggini R; Chadès I; Nicol S; Walters B; Reeson A; Martin TG; Possingham HP; Pichancourt JB; Ponce-Reyes R; Carwardine J
Glob Chang Biol; 2015 Nov; 21(11):3917-30. PubMed ID: 26179346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Addressing transboundary conservation challenges through marine spatial prioritization.
Gissi E; McGowan J; Venier C; Carlo DD; Musco F; Menegon S; Mackelworth P; Agardy T; Possingham H
Conserv Biol; 2018 Oct; 32(5):1107-1117. PubMed ID: 29767466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantifying trade-offs between ecological gains, economic costs, and landowners' preferences in boreal mire protection.
Nieminen E; Kareksela S; Halme P; Kotiaho JS
Ambio; 2021 Oct; 50(10):1841-1850. PubMed ID: 33825157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic planning of disconnection to enhance conservation success in a modified world.
Hermoso V; Januchowski-Hartley SR; Linke S
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Dec; 536():1038-1044. PubMed ID: 26254022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimal dynamic control of invasions: applying a systematic conservation approach.
Adams VM; Setterfield SA
Ecol Appl; 2015 Jun; 25(4):1131-41. PubMed ID: 26465047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incorporating ecological and evolutionary processes into continental-scale conservation planning.
Klein C; Wilson K; Watts M; Stein J; Berry S; Carwardine J; Smith MS; Mackey B; Possingham H
Ecol Appl; 2009 Jan; 19(1):206-17. PubMed ID: 19323184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Applying network theory to prioritize multispecies habitat networks that are robust to climate and land-use change.
Albert CH; Rayfield B; Dumitru M; Gonzalez A
Conserv Biol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1383-1396. PubMed ID: 28383758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of trade-offs in biodiversity conservation planning: linking local management, regional planning and global conservation efforts.
Faith DP; Walker PA
J Biosci; 2002 Jul; 27(4 Suppl 2):393-407. PubMed ID: 12177537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatial priorities for freshwater biodiversity conservation in light of catchment protection and connectivity in Europe.
Szabolcs M; Kapusi F; Carrizo S; Markovic D; Freyhof J; Cid N; Cardoso AC; Scholz M; Kasperidus HD; Darwall WRT; Lengyel S
PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0267801. PubMed ID: 35580083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Insights from life history theory for an explicit treatment of trade-offs in conservation biology.
Charpentier A
Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):738-47. PubMed ID: 25580848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Informed actions: where to cost effectively manage multiple threats to species to maximize return on investment.
Auerbach NA; Tulloch AIT; Possingham HP
Ecol Appl; 2014; 24(6):1357-73. PubMed ID: 29160659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exclusion of agricultural lands in spatial conservation prioritization strategies: consequences for biodiversity and ecosystem service representation.
Durán AP; Duffy JP; Gaston KJ
Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Oct; 281(1792):. PubMed ID: 25143040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Integrating biological and social values when prioritizing places for biodiversity conservation.
Whitehead AL; Kujala H; Ives CD; Gordon A; Lentini PE; Wintle BA; Nicholson E; Raymond CM
Conserv Biol; 2014 Aug; 28(4):992-1003. PubMed ID: 24617898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal allocation of resources among threatened species: a project prioritization protocol.
Joseph LN; Maloney RF; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):328-38. PubMed ID: 19183202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of threat management interactions on conservation priorities.
Auerbach NA; Wilson KA; Tulloch AI; Rhodes JR; Hanson JO; Possingham HP
Conserv Biol; 2015 Dec; 29(6):1626-35. PubMed ID: 26171646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conservation businesses and conservation planning in a biological diversity hotspot.
Di Minin E; Macmillan DC; Goodman PS; Escott B; Slotow R; Moilanen A
Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):808-20. PubMed ID: 23565917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multi-action planning for threat management: a novel approach for the spatial prioritization of conservation actions.
Cattarino L; Hermoso V; Carwardine J; Kennard MJ; Linke S
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0128027. PubMed ID: 26020794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Advancing Land-Sea Conservation Planning: Integrating Modelling of Catchments, Land-Use Change, and River Plumes to Prioritise Catchment Management and Protection.
Álvarez-Romero JG; Pressey RL; Ban NC; Brodie J
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145574. PubMed ID: 26714166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
