These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38831569)

  • 1. Spatial prioritization for widespread invasive species control: Trade-offs between current impact and future spread.
    Carter S; Mills C; Hao Z; Mott R; Hauser CE; White M; Sharples J; Taylor J; Moore JL
    Ecol Appl; 2024 Jul; 34(5):e2982. PubMed ID: 38831569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examining current or future trade-offs for biodiversity conservation in north-eastern Australia.
    Reside AE; VanDerWal J; Moilanen A; Graham EM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172230. PubMed ID: 28222199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Priority threat management of invasive animals to protect biodiversity under climate change.
    Firn J; Maggini R; Chadès I; Nicol S; Walters B; Reeson A; Martin TG; Possingham HP; Pichancourt JB; Ponce-Reyes R; Carwardine J
    Glob Chang Biol; 2015 Nov; 21(11):3917-30. PubMed ID: 26179346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Addressing transboundary conservation challenges through marine spatial prioritization.
    Gissi E; McGowan J; Venier C; Carlo DD; Musco F; Menegon S; Mackelworth P; Agardy T; Possingham H
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Oct; 32(5):1107-1117. PubMed ID: 29767466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantifying trade-offs between ecological gains, economic costs, and landowners' preferences in boreal mire protection.
    Nieminen E; Kareksela S; Halme P; Kotiaho JS
    Ambio; 2021 Oct; 50(10):1841-1850. PubMed ID: 33825157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic planning of disconnection to enhance conservation success in a modified world.
    Hermoso V; Januchowski-Hartley SR; Linke S
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Dec; 536():1038-1044. PubMed ID: 26254022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal dynamic control of invasions: applying a systematic conservation approach.
    Adams VM; Setterfield SA
    Ecol Appl; 2015 Jun; 25(4):1131-41. PubMed ID: 26465047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incorporating ecological and evolutionary processes into continental-scale conservation planning.
    Klein C; Wilson K; Watts M; Stein J; Berry S; Carwardine J; Smith MS; Mackey B; Possingham H
    Ecol Appl; 2009 Jan; 19(1):206-17. PubMed ID: 19323184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Applying network theory to prioritize multispecies habitat networks that are robust to climate and land-use change.
    Albert CH; Rayfield B; Dumitru M; Gonzalez A
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1383-1396. PubMed ID: 28383758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of trade-offs in biodiversity conservation planning: linking local management, regional planning and global conservation efforts.
    Faith DP; Walker PA
    J Biosci; 2002 Jul; 27(4 Suppl 2):393-407. PubMed ID: 12177537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial priorities for freshwater biodiversity conservation in light of catchment protection and connectivity in Europe.
    Szabolcs M; Kapusi F; Carrizo S; Markovic D; Freyhof J; Cid N; Cardoso AC; Scholz M; Kasperidus HD; Darwall WRT; Lengyel S
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0267801. PubMed ID: 35580083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Insights from life history theory for an explicit treatment of trade-offs in conservation biology.
    Charpentier A
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):738-47. PubMed ID: 25580848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Informed actions: where to cost effectively manage multiple threats to species to maximize return on investment.
    Auerbach NA; Tulloch AIT; Possingham HP
    Ecol Appl; 2014; 24(6):1357-73. PubMed ID: 29160659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exclusion of agricultural lands in spatial conservation prioritization strategies: consequences for biodiversity and ecosystem service representation.
    Durán AP; Duffy JP; Gaston KJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Oct; 281(1792):. PubMed ID: 25143040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrating biological and social values when prioritizing places for biodiversity conservation.
    Whitehead AL; Kujala H; Ives CD; Gordon A; Lentini PE; Wintle BA; Nicholson E; Raymond CM
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Aug; 28(4):992-1003. PubMed ID: 24617898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal allocation of resources among threatened species: a project prioritization protocol.
    Joseph LN; Maloney RF; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):328-38. PubMed ID: 19183202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of threat management interactions on conservation priorities.
    Auerbach NA; Wilson KA; Tulloch AI; Rhodes JR; Hanson JO; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Dec; 29(6):1626-35. PubMed ID: 26171646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conservation businesses and conservation planning in a biological diversity hotspot.
    Di Minin E; Macmillan DC; Goodman PS; Escott B; Slotow R; Moilanen A
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):808-20. PubMed ID: 23565917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multi-action planning for threat management: a novel approach for the spatial prioritization of conservation actions.
    Cattarino L; Hermoso V; Carwardine J; Kennard MJ; Linke S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0128027. PubMed ID: 26020794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advancing Land-Sea Conservation Planning: Integrating Modelling of Catchments, Land-Use Change, and River Plumes to Prioritise Catchment Management and Protection.
    Álvarez-Romero JG; Pressey RL; Ban NC; Brodie J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145574. PubMed ID: 26714166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.