120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38831646)
1. Modeling the Intelligibility Benefit of Active Noise Cancelation in Hearing Devices That Improve Signal-to-Noise Ratio.
Sabin AT; McElhone D; Gauger D; Rabinowitz B
Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241260029. PubMed ID: 38831646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T
Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Just-Meaningful Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio.
McShefferty D; Whitmer WM; Akeroyd MA
Trends Hear; 2016 Feb; 20():. PubMed ID: 26834121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of single-microphone noise reduction schemes: can hearing impaired listeners tell the difference?
Huber R; Bisitz T; Gerkmann T; Kiessling J; Meister H; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S55-S61. PubMed ID: 28112001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of combined dynamic compression and single channel noise reduction for hearing aid applications.
Kortlang S; Chen Z; Gerkmann T; Kollmeier B; Hohmann V; Ewert SD
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S43-S54. PubMed ID: 28355947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An algorithm to improve speech recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
Healy EW; Yoho SE; Wang Y; Wang D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3029-38. PubMed ID: 24116438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An environment-adaptive management algorithm for hearing-support devices incorporating listening situation and noise type classifiers.
Yook S; Nam KW; Kim H; Hong SH; Jang DP; Kim IY
Artif Organs; 2015 Apr; 39(4):361-8. PubMed ID: 25284135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
Chen J; Wang Y; Yoho SE; Wang D; Healy EW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
Saripella R; Loizou PC; Thibodeau L; Alford JA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Auditory inspired machine learning techniques can improve speech intelligibility and quality for hearing-impaired listeners.
Monaghan JJ; Goehring T; Yang X; Bolner F; Wang S; Wright MC; Bleeck S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1985. PubMed ID: 28372043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs.
Searchfield GD; Linford T; Kobayashi K; Crowhen D; Latzel M
Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hearing aid fitting and fine-tuning based on estimated individual traits.
Völker C; Ernst SMA; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S139-S145. PubMed ID: 27873543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gain-induced speech distortions and the absence of intelligibility benefit with existing noise-reduction algorithms.
Kim G; Loizou PC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1581-96. PubMed ID: 21895096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An algorithm to increase intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in the presence of a competing talker.
Healy EW; Delfarah M; Vasko JL; Carter BL; Wang D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4230. PubMed ID: 28618817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of reverberation, background talker number, and compression release time on signal-to-noise ratio.
Reinhart P; Zahorik P; Souza PE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jul; 142(1):EL130. PubMed ID: 28764441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of spectral change enhancement for the hearing impaired using parameter values selected with a genetic algorithm.
Chen J; Baer T; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2910-20. PubMed ID: 23654396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
