These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38831792)

  • 1. Modified differential lysis for sexual assault samples using a combined enzymatic and alkaline approach.
    Hudson BC; Dawson Green T
    Forensic Sci Res; 2024 Jun; 9(2):owae022. PubMed ID: 38831792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alternative direct-to-amplification cell lysis techniques for forensically relevant non-sperm cells.
    Arya R; Hudson BC; Green TD
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Nov; 68(6):2116-2127. PubMed ID: 37779342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Alternative direct-to-amplification sperm cell lysis techniques for sexual assault sample processing.
    Schellhammer SK; Hudson BC; Cox JO; Dawson Green T
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jul; 67(4):1668-1678. PubMed ID: 35285573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between MACSprep™ forensic sperm microbead kit and Erase Sperm Isolation kit for the enrichment of sperm fractions recovered from sexual assault samples.
    Grosjean F; Favre M; Castella V
    Int J Legal Med; 2023 Jan; 137(1):267-278. PubMed ID: 35773355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automation of the standard DNA differential extraction on the Hamilton AutoLys STAR system: A proof-of-concept study.
    Timken MD; Klein SB; Kubala S; Scharnhorst G; Buoncristiani MR; Miller KWP
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():96-104. PubMed ID: 30785062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developmental validation of an efficient differential separation method incorporating the i-sep
    White TJ; Rye MS; Tay JW
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jul; 67(4):1679-1689. PubMed ID: 35373351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved resolution of mixed STR profiles using a fully automated differential cell lysis/DNA extraction method.
    Goldstein MC; Cox JO; Seman LB; Cruz TD
    Forensic Sci Res; 2020; 5(2):106-112. PubMed ID: 32939426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The application of alkaline lysis and pressure cycling technology in the differential extraction of DNA from sperm and epithelial cells recovered from cotton swabs.
    Nori DV; McCord BR
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2015 Sep; 407(23):6975-84. PubMed ID: 26055880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enhanced recovery of spermatozoa and comprehensive lysis of epithelial cells from sexual assault samples having a low cell counts or aged up to one year.
    Lounsbury JA; Nambiar SM; Karlsson A; Cunniffe H; Norris JV; Ferrance JP; Landers JP
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 24315594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analytical approaches to differential extraction for sexual assault evidence.
    Clark C; Turiello R; Cotton R; Landers JP
    Anal Chim Acta; 2021 Jan; 1141():230-245. PubMed ID: 33248657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving the efficacy of the standard DNA differential extraction method for sexual assault evidence.
    Timken MD; Klein SB; Buoncristiani MR
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():170-177. PubMed ID: 29494880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inferring the presence of spermatozoa in forensic samples based on male DNA fractionation following differential extraction.
    Alderson G; Gurevitch H; Casimiro T; Reid B; Millman J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():225-232. PubMed ID: 30077873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Towards an affinity-free, centrifugal microfluidic system for rapid, automated forensic differential extraction.
    Woolf MS; Cunha LL; Hadley KC; Moffett RP; Landers JP
    Anal Chim Acta; 2023 Apr; 1249():340826. PubMed ID: 36868762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A portable sperm cell purification instrument based on continuous flow acoustophoretic separation of sperm cells for on-site forensic sample pretreatment.
    Sun K; Wang H; Wang L; Lu Y; Liu R; Liu P; Cheng J
    Lab Chip; 2021 Mar; 21(5):933-941. PubMed ID: 33439185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the efficacy of DNA differential extraction methods for sexual assault evidence.
    Klein SB; Buoncristiani MR
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():109-117. PubMed ID: 28419902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Separation of sperm and epithelial cells based on the hydrodynamic effect for forensic analysis.
    Liu W; Chen W; Liu R; Ou Y; Liu H; Xie L; Lu Y; Li C; Li B; Cheng J
    Biomicrofluidics; 2015 Jul; 9(4):044127. PubMed ID: 26392829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic differential extraction for forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.
    Norris JV; Evander M; Horsman-Hall KM; Nilsson J; Laurell T; Landers JP
    Anal Chem; 2009 Aug; 81(15):6089-95. PubMed ID: 19591449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automation of the Differential Digestion Process of Sexual Assault Evidence.
    Wong H; Mihalovich J
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):539-550. PubMed ID: 30044890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a rapid, 96-well alkaline based differential DNA extraction method for sexual assault evidence.
    Hudlow WR; Buoncristiani MR
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 21288791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microchip-based cell lysis and DNA extraction from sperm cells for application to forensic analysis.
    Bienvenue JM; Duncalf N; Marchiarullo D; Ferrance JP; Landers JP
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Mar; 51(2):266-73. PubMed ID: 16566759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.