BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38833287)

  • 1. How low can you go? Short-read polishing of Oxford Nanopore bacterial genome assemblies.
    Bouras G; Judd LM; Edwards RA; Vreugde S; Stinear TP; Wick RR
    Microb Genom; 2024 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 38833287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Polypolish: Short-read polishing of long-read bacterial genome assemblies.
    Wick RR; Holt KE
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Jan; 18(1):e1009802. PubMed ID: 35073327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Polishing the Oxford Nanopore long-read assemblies of bacterial pathogens with Illumina short reads to improve genomic analyses.
    Chen Z; Erickson DL; Meng J
    Genomics; 2021 May; 113(3):1366-1377. PubMed ID: 33716184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assembling the perfect bacterial genome using Oxford Nanopore and Illumina sequencing.
    Wick RR; Judd LM; Holt KE
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2023 Mar; 19(3):e1010905. PubMed ID: 36862631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the accuracy of bacterial genome reconstruction with Oxford Nanopore R10.4.1 long-read-only sequencing.
    Sanderson ND; Hopkins KMV; Colpus M; Parker M; Lipworth S; Crook D; Stoesser N
    Microb Genom; 2024 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 38713194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of strategies for the assembly of diverse bacterial genomes using MinION long-read sequencing.
    Goldstein S; Beka L; Graf J; Klassen JL
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):23. PubMed ID: 30626323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Polishing De Novo Nanopore Assemblies of Bacteria and Eukaryotes With FMLRC2.
    Mak QXC; Wick RR; Holt JM; Wang JR
    Mol Biol Evol; 2023 Mar; 40(3):. PubMed ID: 36869750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of De Novo Assembly Strategies for Bacterial Genomes.
    Zhang P; Jiang D; Wang Y; Yao X; Luo Y; Yang Z
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Jul; 22(14):. PubMed ID: 34299288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative evaluation of Nanopore polishing tools for microbial genome assembly and polishing strategies for downstream analysis.
    Lee JY; Kong M; Oh J; Lim J; Chung SH; Kim JM; Kim JS; Kim KH; Yoo JC; Kwak W
    Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):20740. PubMed ID: 34671046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assembly methods for nanopore-based metagenomic sequencing: a comparative study.
    Latorre-Pérez A; Villalba-Bermell P; Pascual J; Vilanova C
    Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13588. PubMed ID: 32788623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do we still need Illumina sequencing data? Evaluating Oxford Nanopore Technologies R10.4.1 flow cells and the Rapid v14 library prep kit for Gram negative bacteria whole genome assemblies.
    Lerminiaux N; Fakharuddin K; Mulvey MR; Mataseje L
    Can J Microbiol; 2024 May; 70(5):178-189. PubMed ID: 38354391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of R9.4.1/Kit10 and R10/Kit12 Oxford Nanopore flowcells and chemistries in bacterial genome reconstruction.
    Sanderson ND; Kapel N; Rodger G; Webster H; Lipworth S; Street TL; Peto T; Crook D; Stoesser N
    Microb Genom; 2023 Jan; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 36748454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trycycler: consensus long-read assemblies for bacterial genomes.
    Wick RR; Judd LM; Cerdeira LT; Hawkey J; Méric G; Vezina B; Wyres KL; Holt KE
    Genome Biol; 2021 Sep; 22(1):266. PubMed ID: 34521459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benchmarking Long-Read Assemblers for Genomic Analyses of Bacterial Pathogens Using Oxford Nanopore Sequencing.
    Chen Z; Erickson DL; Meng J
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Dec; 21(23):. PubMed ID: 33271875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of long-read sequencing technologies in the hybrid assembly of complex bacterial genomes.
    De Maio N; Shaw LP; Hubbard A; George S; Sanderson ND; Swann J; Wick R; AbuOun M; Stubberfield E; Hoosdally SJ; Crook DW; Peto TEA; Sheppard AE; Bailey MJ; Read DS; Anjum MF; Walker AS; Stoesser N; On Behalf Of The Rehab Consortium
    Microb Genom; 2019 Sep; 5(9):. PubMed ID: 31483244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Closing the gap: Oxford Nanopore Technologies R10 sequencing allows comparable results to Illumina sequencing for SNP-based outbreak investigation of bacterial pathogens.
    Bogaerts B; Van den Bossche A; Verhaegen B; Delbrassinne L; Mattheus W; Nouws S; Godfroid M; Hoffman S; Roosens NHC; De Keersmaecker SCJ; Vanneste K
    J Clin Microbiol; 2024 May; 62(5):e0157623. PubMed ID: 38441926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oxford Nanopore R10.4 long-read sequencing enables the generation of near-finished bacterial genomes from pure cultures and metagenomes without short-read or reference polishing.
    Sereika M; Kirkegaard RH; Karst SM; Michaelsen TY; Sørensen EA; Wollenberg RD; Albertsen M
    Nat Methods; 2022 Jul; 19(7):823-826. PubMed ID: 35789207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Advancing metagenome-assembled genome-based pathogen identification: unraveling the power of long-read assembly algorithms in Oxford Nanopore sequencing.
    Chen Z; Grim CJ; Ramachandran P; Meng J
    Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Jun; 12(6):e0011724. PubMed ID: 38687063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. JASPER: A fast genome polishing tool that improves accuracy of genome assemblies.
    Guo A; Salzberg SL; Zimin AV
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2023 Mar; 19(3):e1011032. PubMed ID: 37000853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phased nanopore assembly with Shasta and modular graph phasing with GFAse.
    Lorig-Roach R; Meredith M; Monlong J; Jain M; Olsen HE; McNulty B; Porubsky D; Montague TG; Lucas JK; Condon C; Eizenga JM; Juul S; McKenzie SK; Simmonds SE; Park J; Asri M; Koren S; Eichler EE; Axel R; Martin B; Carnevali P; Miga KH; Paten B
    Genome Res; 2024 Apr; 34(3):454-468. PubMed ID: 38627094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.