These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38834368)

  • 1. An Assessment of the Quality of Competence Restoration Research.
    Candilis PJ; Parker GF
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2024 Jun; 52(2):153-160. PubMed ID: 38834368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Primer for Increasing Competency in Forensic Psychiatry Research.
    Kolla NJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2024 Jun; 52(2):161-164. PubMed ID: 38834360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. AAPL Practice Guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial.
    Mossman D; Noffsinger SG; Ash P; Frierson RL; Gerbasi J; Hackett M; Lewis CF; Pinals DA; Scott CL; Sieg KG; Wall BW; Zonana HV;
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4 Suppl):S3-72. PubMed ID: 18083992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ten year research update (2001-2010): evaluations for competence to stand trial (adjudicative competence).
    Fogel MH; Schiffman W; Mumley D; Tillbrook C; Grisso T
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(2):165-91. PubMed ID: 23348511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluations of competence to stand trial are evolving amid a national "competency crisis".
    Murrie DC; Gowensmith WN; Kois LE; Packer IK
    Behav Sci Law; 2023; 41(5):310-325. PubMed ID: 37056195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Five year research update (1996-2000): evaluations for competence to stand trial (adjudicative competence).
    Mumley DL; Tillbrook CE; Grisso T
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(3):329-50. PubMed ID: 12808694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pre-adjudicative and adjudicative competence in juveniles and young adults.
    Redlich AD; Silverman M; Steiner H
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(3):393-410. PubMed ID: 12808697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Juvenile offenders: competence to stand trial.
    Soulier M
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2012 Dec; 35(4):837-54. PubMed ID: 23107566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AAPL Practice Guideline for the Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial: an American legal perspective.
    Fitch WL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 18086744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Empathy or objectivity: The forensic examiner's dilemma?
    Shuman DW; Zervopoulos JA
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(5):585-602. PubMed ID: 20821814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feigning in adjudicative competence evaluations.
    Soliman S; Resnick PJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(5):614-29. PubMed ID: 20687120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Forensic telepsychiatry: a possible solution for South Africa?
    Mars M; Ramlall S; Kaliski S
    Afr J Psychiatry (Johannesbg); 2012 Jul; 15(4):244-7. PubMed ID: 22829226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adjudicative competence: evidence that impairment in "rational understanding" is taxonic.
    Marcus DK; Poythress NG; Edens JF; Lilienfeld SO
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Sep; 22(3):716-22. PubMed ID: 20822285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantifying the accuracy of forensic examiners in the absence of a "gold standard".
    Mossman D; Bowen MD; Vanness DJ; Bienenfeld D; Correll T; Kay J; Klykylo WM; Lehrer DS
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Oct; 34(5):402-17. PubMed ID: 19771499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Challenges to Reforming the Competence to Stand Trial and Competence Restoration System.
    Callahan L; Pinals DA
    Psychiatr Serv; 2020 Jul; 71(7):691-697. PubMed ID: 32237984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characteristics of Misdemeanants Treated for Competency Restoration.
    Gillis A; Holoyda B; Newman WJ; Wilson MD; Xiong GL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2016 Dec; 44(4):442-450. PubMed ID: 28003388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preadolescent adjudicative competence: methodological considerations and recommendations for practice standards.
    Oberlander LB; Goldstein NE; Ho CN
    Behav Sci Law; 2001; 19(4):545-63. PubMed ID: 11568960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Introduction to this issue: Adjudicative competencies.
    Felthous AR
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(5):581-4. PubMed ID: 20957689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Criminal Adjudication: Factor structure, interrater reliability, and association with clinician opinion of competence in a forensic inpatient sample.
    Wood ME; Anderson JL; Glassmire DM
    Psychol Assess; 2017 Jun; 29(6):776-785. PubMed ID: 28594219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fitness in paradise: quality of forensic reports submitted to the Hawaii judiciary.
    Robinson R; Acklin MW
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2010; 33(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 20483159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.