143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38835335)
21. A systematic guide for peer reviewers for a medical journal.
Garfield JM; Kaye AD; Kolinsky DC; Urman RD
J Med Pract Manage; 2015; 30(6 Spec No):13-7. PubMed ID: 26062311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. We need to talk about peer-review-Experienced reviewers are not endangered species, but they need motivation.
Ellwanger JH; Chies JAB
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Sep; 125():201-205. PubMed ID: 32061827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [The recognition of peer reviewers activity: the potential promotion of a virtuous circle.].
Pierno A; Fruscio R; Bellani G
Recenti Prog Med; 2017 Sep; 108(9):355-359. PubMed ID: 28901342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Journal editors' perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study.
Glonti K; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D
BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e033421. PubMed ID: 31767597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Are Reviewers' Scores Influenced by Citations to Their Own Work? An Analysis of Submitted Manuscripts and Peer Reviewer Reports.
Schriger DL; Kadera SP; von Elm E
Ann Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 67(3):401-406.e6. PubMed ID: 26518378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Tips and tricks for how to become a good reviewer.
Hughes JD; Cristiani R; Hirschmann MT; Musahl V; Eriksson K; Karlsson J
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Nov; 31(11):4631-4636. PubMed ID: 37792083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Challenges in peer review: how to guarantee the quality and transparency of the editorial process in scientific journals.
Candal-Pedreira C; Rey-Brandariz J; Varela-Lema L; Pérez-Ríos M; Ruano-Ravina A
An Pediatr (Engl Ed); 2023 Jul; 99(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 37349245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Why Participate in Peer Review as a Journal Manuscript Reviewer: What's in It for You?
Pytynia KB
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Jun; 156(6):976-977. PubMed ID: 27677597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Peer review? No thanks!
Castelo-Branco C
Climacteric; 2023 Feb; 26(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 36420749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Navigating the journey as a peer reviewer: a roadmap to success.
LaPlant BN; Ponte CD; Vordenberg SE; Murry LT; Rhodes LA; Cavaco AM; Ramachandran S; Lu B; Covvey JR
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2024 May; ():102115. PubMed ID: 38705466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. "It is becoming increasingly difficult to find reviewers"-myths and facts about peer review.
Zupanc GKH
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2024 Jan; 210(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 37318565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Conflicting interests involved in the process of publishing in biomedical journals.
Igi R
J BUON; 2015; 20(5):1373-7. PubMed ID: 26537088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Is expert peer review obsolete? A model suggests that post-publication reader review may exceed the accuracy of traditional peer review.
Herron DM
Surg Endosc; 2012 Aug; 26(8):2275-80. PubMed ID: 22350231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. How to write a revised manuscript in clinical medicine.
Sakakura K; Fujita H
Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2023 Apr; 38(2):187-193. PubMed ID: 36626024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals.
Glonti K; Cauchi D; Cobo E; Boutron I; Moher D; Hren D
BMC Med; 2019 Jun; 17(1):118. PubMed ID: 31217033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Editors' requests of peer reviewers: a study and a proposal.
Frank E
Prev Med; 1996; 25(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 8860274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The Game Between a Biased Reviewer and His Editor.
García JA; Rodriguez-Sánchez R; Fdez-Valdivia J
Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Feb; 25(1):265-283. PubMed ID: 29079911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reviewer selection biases editorial decisions on manuscripts.
Hausmann L; Schweitzer B; Middleton FA; Schulz JB
J Neurochem; 2018 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 29377133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39.
Verharen JPH
Elife; 2023 Nov; 12():. PubMed ID: 37922198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The relationship between a reviewer's recommendation and editorial decision of manuscripts submitted for publication in obstetrics.
Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Odibo AO; Chauhan SP; Smulian JC; Oyelese Y
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):703.e1-5. PubMed ID: 24983685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
