These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3883750)

  • 1. 2 X 2 tables.
    Brown GW
    Am J Dis Child; 1985 Apr; 139(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 3883750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Characteristics of categorical data analysis].
    Zuvić-Butorac M
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():63-79. PubMed ID: 16526308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. More enlightenment on the essence of applying Fisher's Exact test when testing for statistical significance using small sample data presented in a 2 x 2 table.
    Kangave D
    West Afr J Med; 1992; 11(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 1476961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chi 2 tests: how useful are they in the analysis of medical research data?
    Osborn JF
    Ann Ig; 1989; 1(3-4):417-32. PubMed ID: 2483622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Formulae and tables for the determination of sample sizes and power in clinical trials for testing differences in proportions for the two-sample design: a review.
    Sahai H; Khurshid A
    Stat Med; 1996 Jan; 15(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 8614740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Power comparison of two-sided exact tests for association in 2 x 2 contingency tables using standard, mid p and randomized test versions.
    Lydersen S; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3859-71. PubMed ID: 14673943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On design considerations and randomization-based inference for community intervention trials.
    Gail MH; Mark SD; Carroll RJ; Green SB; Pee D
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(11):1069-92. PubMed ID: 8804140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recommended tests for association in 2 x 2 tables.
    Lydersen S; Fagerland MW; Laake P
    Stat Med; 2009 Mar; 28(7):1159-75. PubMed ID: 19170020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Epidemiological study designs.
    Diomidus M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 65():126-35. PubMed ID: 15460223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of 2 x 2 tables of frequencies: matching test to experimental design.
    Ludbrook J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Dec; 37(6):1430-5. PubMed ID: 18710887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cohort studies.
    Kelsey JL
    J Rheumatol Suppl; 1983 Nov; 10():96-9. PubMed ID: 6607353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proportions, odds, and risk.
    Sistrom CL; Garvan CW
    Radiology; 2004 Jan; 230(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 14695382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysing 2 × 2 contingency tables: which test is best?
    Ludbrook J
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2013 Mar; 40(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 23294254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Types of clinical caries studies: epidemiological surveys, randomized clinical trials, and demonstration programs.
    Stamm JW
    J Dent Res; 1984 May; 63 Spec No():701-8. PubMed ID: 6373865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of data analysis strategies for intent-to-treat analysis in pre-test-post-test designs with substantial dropout rates.
    Salim A; Mackinnon A; Christensen H; Griffiths K
    Psychiatry Res; 2008 Sep; 160(3):335-45. PubMed ID: 18718673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective clinical trials of biotherapies in solid tumors: a 5-year survey.
    Ottaiano A; Mollo E; Di Lorenzo G; Pisano C; Di Maio M; Barletta E; Pensabene M; Segati R; Bullian P; Nasti G; Bryce J; Scala S; Castello G; Ascierto PA
    Cancer Immunol Immunother; 2005 Jan; 54(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 15693138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [I. Evaluation of the efficacy of a clinical intervention].
    Epidemiol Prev; 1989; 11(40-41):3-23. PubMed ID: 2534527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exact sample sizes needed to detect dependence in 2 x 3 tables.
    Sánchez MS; Basten CJ; Ferrenberg AM; Asmussen MA; Arnold J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Mar; 69(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 16343573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Paired versus two-sample design for a clinical trial of treatments with dichotomous outcome: power considerations.
    Wacholder S; Weinberg CR
    Biometrics; 1982 Sep; 38(3):801-12. PubMed ID: 7171700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient heterogeneity in clinical trials.
    Simon R
    Cancer Treat Rep; 1980; 64(2-3):405-10. PubMed ID: 7407777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.