126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38839273)
1. Comparison of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus conventional surgery for uterosacral ligament suspension in patients who had concomitant vaginal hysterectomy for subtotal uterine prolapse.
Ekin M; Dura MC; Yildiz S; Gürsoy B; Yildiz YY; Dogan K; Kaya C
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2024 Jul; 17(3):e13333. PubMed ID: 38839273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic versus conventional vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension for apical compartment prolapse.
Aharoni S; Matanes E; Lauterbach R; Mor O; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 May; 260():203-207. PubMed ID: 33838557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Hysterectomy and Apical Suspension of the Vaginal Cuff to the Uterosacral Ligament.
Lowenstein L; Baekelandt J; Paz Y; Lauterbach R; Matanes E
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1015. PubMed ID: 30980991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for uterosacral ligament suspension: pilot study of 35 cases of severe pelvic organ prolapse.
Lu Z; Chen Y; Wang X; Li J; Hua K; Hu C
BMC Surg; 2021 Jun; 21(1):286. PubMed ID: 34103032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Apical pelvic organ prolapse repair via vaginal-assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: Initial experience from a tertiary care hospital.
Alay I; Kaya C; Cengiz H; Yildiz S; Aslan O; Yasar L; Ekin M
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2021 Jul; 14(3):346-352. PubMed ID: 32967055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility and Learning Curve of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery for Hysterectomy and Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in Apical Compartment Prolapse.
Lowenstein L; Matanes E; Lauterbach R; Mor O; Burke YZ; Weiner Z; Baekelandt J
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jan; 27(1):e171-e176. PubMed ID: 32520745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of complications and prolapse recurrence between laparoscopic and vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for the treatment of vaginal prolapse.
Turner LC; Lavelle ES; Shepherd JP
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 May; 27(5):797-803. PubMed ID: 26658893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy: An Innovative Approach for Treatment of Uterine Prolapse.
Lowenstein L; Ben-David C; Mick I; Levi G; Matanes E; Mor O
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1818-1819. PubMed ID: 34171475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Sec Shull by Vaginal Natural Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES).
Scollo P; Pecorino B; Ferrara M; Mereu L
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Jun; 44(6):703. PubMed ID: 35276427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perioperative outcomes of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in hysterectomy: A comparative study.
Yuan W; Yang F; Zheng Y
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Jun; 165(3):1151-1157. PubMed ID: 38140804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Feasibility and Safety of vNOTES Hysterectomy and Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: A Case Series.
Farah S; Albaini O; Al Jardali M; Daccache A; Jallad K
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 May; 30(5):414-417. PubMed ID: 36646312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of hysterectomy cases performed
Kaya C; Alay I; Cengiz H; Yıldız GO; Baghaki HS; Yasar L
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Apr; 41(3):434-438. PubMed ID: 32530343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Post-Hysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse Repair.
Barba M; Cola A; Melocchi T; De Vicari D; Costa C; Volontè S; Sandullo L; Frigerio M
Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Feb; 60(2):. PubMed ID: 38399607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Repeat Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery: A First Feasibility Study.
Nulens K; Van Genechten I; Baekelandt J
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2021; 86(1-2):117-122. PubMed ID: 33556956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hysterectomy via vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery in virgin patients: a first feasibility study.
Nulens K; Kempenaers R; Baekelandt J
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Jan; 42(1):116-121. PubMed ID: 33892619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus conventional vaginal surgery for sacrospinous ligament fixation of apical compartment prolapse: a retrospective analysis.
Huang L; Yu J; Li Y; Gong ZL; Feng D; He L; Lin YH
BMC Surg; 2023 Jan; 23(1):24. PubMed ID: 36707831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cumulative Sum Analysis of Learning Curve Process for Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Hysterectomy.
Mereu L; Pecorino B; Ferrara M; Siniscalchi M; Garraffa G; D'Agate MG; Scollo P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Jul; 30(7):582-586. PubMed ID: 36966920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic-assisted vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus robotic-assisted single-site port for benign hysterectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes.
Thigpen B; Connell P; Erfani H; Koythong T; Sunkara S; Guan X
J Robot Surg; 2023 Oct; 17(5):2487-2494. PubMed ID: 37523047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally Invasive Sacrohysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.
Hwang WY; Jeon MJ; Suh DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2024 May; 31(5):406-413. PubMed ID: 38336010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
