142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38840138)
1. Effect of margin designs and loading conditions on the stress distribution of endocrowns: a finite element analysis.
Zeng B; Luo B; Hu J; Meng D; Zhang J; Cao X; Jiang Q
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):657. PubMed ID: 38840138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Influence of different designs of marginal preparation on stress distribution in the mandibular premolar restored with endocrown].
Guo J; Wang XY; Li XS; Sun HY; Liu L; Li HB
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2016 Feb; 36(2):200-4. PubMed ID: 26922016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical behavior and Weibull survival of CAD-CAM endocrowns with different marginal designs: A 3D finite element analysis.
AboElhassan RG; Watts DC; Alamoush RA; Elraggal A
Dent Mater; 2024 Feb; 40(2):227-235. PubMed ID: 37977990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of margin design and restorative material on the stress distribution of endocrowns: a 3D finite element analysis.
Zheng Z; Sun J; Jiang L; Wu Y; He J; Ruan W; Yan W
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Feb; 22(1):30. PubMed ID: 35120525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical behavior of endocrown restorations with different cavity design and CAD-CAM materials under a static and vertical load: A finite element analysis.
Abtahi S; Alikhasi M; Siadat H
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Apr; 127(4):600.e1-600.e8. PubMed ID: 35016795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Influence of base materials on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with endocrowns].
Jiang YS; Feng L; Gao XJ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Aug; 53(4):764-769. PubMed ID: 34393242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 3D-Finite element analysis of molars restored with endocrowns and posts during masticatory simulation.
Dejak B; Młotkowski A
Dent Mater; 2013 Dec; 29(12):e309-17. PubMed ID: 24157244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical behavior of endocrowns vs fiber post-core-crown vs cast post-core-crown for the restoration of maxillary central incisors with 1 mm and 2 mm ferrule height: A 3D static linear finite element analysis.
Li X; Kang T; Zhan D; Xie J; Guo L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Oct; 99(43):e22648. PubMed ID: 33120754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Strength comparison of anterior teeth restored with ceramic endocrowns vs custom-made post and cores.
Dejak B; Młotkowski A
J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr; 62(2):171-176. PubMed ID: 28886951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative Finite Element Analysis of Endocrowns and Traditional Restorations for Endodontically Treated Mandibular First Molars.
Al Qahtani WMS
Med Sci Monit; 2023 Nov; 29():e941314. PubMed ID: 37941316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rehabilitation of severely-destructed endodontically treated premolar teeth with novel endocrown system: Biomechanical behavior assessment through 3D finite element and in vitro analyses.
Shams A; Elsherbini M; Elsherbiny AA; Özcan M; Sakrana AA
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Feb; 126():105031. PubMed ID: 34922296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of mvM stress of inlays, onlays and endocrowns made from various materials and their bonding with molars in a computer simulation of mastication - FEA.
Dejak B; Młotkowski A
Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):854-864. PubMed ID: 32473834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Jiang W; Bo H; Yongchun G; LongXing N
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20105674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical Assessment of Restored Mandibular Molar by Endocrown in Comparison to a Glass Fiber Post-Retained Conventional Crown: 3D Finite Element Analysis.
Helal MA; Wang Z
J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):988-996. PubMed ID: 29067737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars restored with different endocrown designs: Finite element study.
Aldesoki M; Bourauel C; Morsi T; El-Anwar MI; Aboelfadl AK; Elshazly TM
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Sep; 133():105309. PubMed ID: 35689987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanics of anterior endocrowns with different designs and depths: Study of finite elements.
Cruzado-Oliva FH; Alarco-La Rosa LF; Vega-Anticona A; Arbildo-Vega HI
J Clin Exp Dent; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e1016-e1021. PubMed ID: 38186913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The synergetic effect of pulp chamber extension depth and occlusal thickness on stress distribution of molar endocrowns: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Zhang Y; Lai H; Meng Q; Gong Q; Tong Z
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2022 Jun; 33(7):56. PubMed ID: 35723747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Influence of thread shapes of custommade root-analogue implants on stress distribution of peri-implant bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis].
Lin CP; Lu SH; Zhu JX; Hu HC; Yue ZG; Tang ZH
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Dec; 51(6):1130-1137. PubMed ID: 31848517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of Restoration Height and Masticatory Load Orientation on Ceramic Endocrowns.
da Fonseca GF; Dal Piva AM; Tribst JP; Borges AL
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1052-1057. PubMed ID: 30287703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical properties of different endocrown designs on endodontically treated teeth.
Huang Y; Fokkinga WA; Zhang Q; Creugers NHJ; Jiang Q
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Apr; 140():105691. PubMed ID: 36739827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
