These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38841269)
1. Corrigendum: Maternity care in the Brussels Capital Region: Towards a paradigm shift? Vermeulen J; Fobelets M; Schoentjes A; Boucher L; Depuydt L; D'haenens F Eur J Midwifery; 2024; 8():. PubMed ID: 38841269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maternity care in the Brussels Capital Region: Towards a paradigm shift? Vermeulen J; Fobelets M; Schoentjes A; Boucher L; Depuydt L; D'haenens F Eur J Midwifery; 2024; 8():. PubMed ID: 38774061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The exploration of professional midwifery autonomy: Understanding and experiences of final-year midwifery students. Vermeulen J; Buyl R; Luyben A; Fleming V; Tency I; Fobelets M Nurse Educ Today; 2024 Mar; 134():106101. PubMed ID: 38266429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Corrigendum: Home-based postnatal midwifery care facilitated a smooth succession into motherhood: A Swedish interview study. Johansson M; Thies-Lagergren L Eur J Midwifery; 2023; 7():16. PubMed ID: 37492269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Women's preferences and knowledge about the legal competences of midwives in Brussels, Belgium. A descriptive observational study. Vermeulen J; Swinnen E; D'haenens F; Buyl R; Beeckman K Midwifery; 2016 Sep; 40():177-86. PubMed ID: 27450589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Mother's Autonomy in Decision Making (MADM) scale: Patient-led development and psychometric testing of a new instrument to evaluate experience of maternity care. Vedam S; Stoll K; Martin K; Rubashkin N; Partridge S; Thordarson D; Jolicoeur G; PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171804. PubMed ID: 28231285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient-led decision making: Measuring autonomy and respect in Canadian maternity care. Vedam S; Stoll K; McRae DN; Korchinski M; Velasquez R; Wang J; Partridge S; McRae L; Martin RE; Jolicoeur G; Patient Educ Couns; 2019 Mar; 102(3):586-594. PubMed ID: 30448044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Childbirth policies and practices in Ireland and the journey towards midwifery-led care. Devane D; Murphy-Lawless J; Begley CM Midwifery; 2007 Mar; 23(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 16677746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Opinions of maternity care professionals and other stakeholders about integration of maternity care: a qualitative study in the Netherlands. Perdok H; Jans S; Verhoeven C; Henneman L; Wiegers T; Mol BW; Schellevis F; de Jonge A BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Jul; 16(1):188. PubMed ID: 27459967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Australian primary maternity units: past, present and future. Monk AR; Tracy S; Foureur M; Barclay L Women Birth; 2013 Sep; 26(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 23830063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How Do Midwives View Their Professional Autonomy, Now and in Future? Vermeulen J; Fobelets M; Fleming V; Luyben A; Stas L; Buyl R Healthcare (Basel); 2023 Jun; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 37372919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Primary Maternity Units in rural and remote Australia: Results of a national survey. Kruske S; Kildea S; Jenkinson B; Pilcher J; Robin S; Rolfe M; Kornelsen J; Barclay L Midwifery; 2016 Sep; 40():1-9. PubMed ID: 27428092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The lived experiences of autonomous Angolan midwives working in midwifery-led, maternity units. Pettersson KO; Svensson ML; Christensson K Midwifery; 2001 Jun; 17(2):102-14. PubMed ID: 11399131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Key Maternity Care Stakeholders' Views on Midwives' Professional Autonomy. Vermeulen J; Buyl R; Luyben A; Fleming V; Fobelets M Healthcare (Basel); 2023 Apr; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 37174773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How a perineal care bundle impacts midwifery practice in Australian maternity hospitals: A critical, reflexive thematic analysis. Allen J; Small K; Lee N Women Birth; 2022 Feb; 35(1):e1-e9. PubMed ID: 33485817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An exploration of influences on women's birthplace decision-making in New Zealand: a mixed methods prospective cohort within the Evaluating Maternity Units study. Grigg C; Tracy SK; Daellenbach R; Kensington M; Schmied V BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Jun; 14():210. PubMed ID: 24951093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Harming one to benefit another: The paradox of autonomy and consent in maternity care. Kingma E Bioethics; 2021 Jun; 35(5):456-464. PubMed ID: 33835517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Births in freestanding midwifery-led units in Norway: What women view as important aspects of care. Nørstebø HS; Nilsen ABV; Blix E; Bakken KS; Eri TS Sex Reprod Healthc; 2023 Jun; 36():100857. PubMed ID: 37247500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What do women want? Valuing women's preferences and estimating demand for alternative models of maternity care using a discrete choice experiment. Fawsitt CG; Bourke J; Greene RA; McElroy B; Krucien N; Murphy R; Lutomski JE Health Policy; 2017 Nov; 121(11):1154-1160. PubMed ID: 28965792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An intrapartum intervention scoring system for the comparison of maternity units' intrapartum care of nulliparous women suitable for midwifery-led care. Mead MM; Kornbrot D Midwifery; 2004 Mar; 20(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 15020024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]