These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38842233)
1. Comparison of Roughness, Wettability, and SEM Features between Sandblasted Acid-Etched and Oxidized Titanium Dental Implants. Chhabra K; Rajasekar A J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2024; 34(4):57-63. PubMed ID: 38842233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surface characterization of SLActive dental implants. Zinelis S; Silikas N; Thomas A; Syres K; Eliades G Eur J Esthet Dent; 2012; 7(1):72-92. PubMed ID: 22319766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Malondialdehyde Levels among Patients with Sandblasted Acid-Etched and Anodized Surface Dental Implants: A Prospective Clinical Study. Rajasekar A; Varghese SS J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2024; 34(3):1-7. PubMed ID: 38505886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of early osseointegration between laser-treated/acid-etched and sandblasted/acid-etched titanium implant surfaces. Rong M; Lu H; Wan L; Zhang X; Lin X; Li S; Zhou L; Lv Y; Su Y J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2018 Mar; 29(4):43. PubMed ID: 29603028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of Er: YAG laser irradiation on wettability, surface roughness, and biocompatibility of SLA titanium surfaces: an in vitro study. Ayobian-Markazi N; Karimi M; Safar-Hajhosseini A Lasers Med Sci; 2015 Feb; 30(2):561-6. PubMed ID: 23760881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surface Modifications of Commercial Dental Implant Systems: An Overview. Sivaswamy V; Bahl V J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2023; 33(2):71-77. PubMed ID: 36734929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Which surface properties enhance bone response to implants? Comparison of oxidized magnesium, TiUnite, and Osseotite implant surfaces. Sul YT; Johansson C; Albrektsson T Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 16900812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surface characteristics of electrochemically oxidized implants and acid-etched implants: surface chemistry, morphology, pore configurations, oxide thickness, crystal structure, and roughness. Sul YT; Byon E; Wennerberg A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):631-40. PubMed ID: 18807558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants. Orsini G; Assenza B; Scarano A; Piattelli M; Piattelli A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 11151575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Plasma Oxidation-Treated TiOx Film on Early Osseointegration. Jiang H; Zhang T; Zhou W; Lin Z; Liu Z Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1011-1018. PubMed ID: 30231086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early osseointegration driven by the surface chemistry and wettability of dental implants. Sartoretto SC; Alves AT; Resende RF; Calasans-Maia J; Granjeiro JM; Calasans-Maia MD J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 26221922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Er,Cr:YSGG laser surface treatment of gamma titanium aluminide: Scanning electron microscopy-energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer analysis, wettability and Koopaie M; Kia Darbandsari A; Hakimiha N; Kolahdooz S Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2020 Aug; 234(8):769-783. PubMed ID: 32419598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. UV-A and UV-C light induced hydrophilization of dental implants. Al Qahtani MS; Wu Y; Spintzyk S; Krieg P; Killinger A; Schweizer E; Stephan I; Scheideler L; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Rupp F Dent Mater; 2015 Aug; 31(8):e157-67. PubMed ID: 25981907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relevant aspects in the surface properties in titanium dental implants for the cellular viability. Velasco-Ortega E; Alfonso-Rodríguez CA; Monsalve-Guil L; España-López A; Jiménez-Guerra A; Garzón I; Alaminos M; Gil FJ Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 Jul; 64():1-10. PubMed ID: 27127022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Osseointegration of chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surface in diabetic rats: a histological and scanning electron microscopy study. NemŢoi A; Trandafir V; Paşca AS; Şindilar EV; Drăgan E; Odri GA; NemŢoi A; Haba D; Şapte E Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2017; 58(3):881-886. PubMed ID: 29250668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Wettability of implant surfaces: Blood vs autologous platelet liquid (APL). Scarano A; Tari Rexhep S; Leo L; Lorusso F J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Feb; 126():104773. PubMed ID: 34690099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of Er:YAG laser irradiation on the scanning electron microscopic structure and surface roughness of various implant surfaces: an in vitro study. Shin SI; Min HK; Park BH; Kwon YH; Park JB; Herr Y; Heo SJ; Chung JH Lasers Med Sci; 2011 Nov; 26(6):767-76. PubMed ID: 20694493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of Surface Contaminants and Hydrocarbon Pellicle on the Results of Wettability Measurements of Titanium. Kido D; Komatsu K; Suzumura T; Matsuura T; Cheng J; Kim J; Park W; Ogawa T Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Sep; 24(19):. PubMed ID: 37834133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of laser-etched Ti implant surfaces vs. chemically modified SLA Ti implant surfaces: Removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbit tibias. Lee JT; Cho SA J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():299-307. PubMed ID: 27093590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]