114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38842307)
1. What Did the Ideal Beauty of the 15th Century Look Like? An Anthropometric Analysis of Botticelli Portraits.
Jung SG; Kim H; Hwang K; Hwang YJ
J Craniofac Surg; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38842307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The anthropomorphic proportions of the face: an evaluation of the response to orthodontic surgical treatment of Angle class III].
Savastano C; Craca R
Minerva Stomatol; 1992 Sep; 41(9):373-83. PubMed ID: 1491654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anthropometric comparison of the idealized youth and hideous old man of Leonardo's profile drawings.
Hwang K; Heo WY; Jeong JM; Hwang SW
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):2223-6. PubMed ID: 25340691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Frontal facial proportions of 12-year-old southern Chinese: a photogrammetric study.
Yeung CY; McGrath CP; Wong RW; Hägg EU; Lo J; Yang Y
Head Face Med; 2015 Aug; 11():26. PubMed ID: 26271276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Craniofacial anthropometric norms of Malays.
Ngeow WC; Aljunid ST
Singapore Med J; 2009 May; 50(5):525-8. PubMed ID: 19495526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How Do the Faces of Kyrgyz Beauties Look? A Photogrammetric Analysis of Beauty Pageant Winners.
Hwang SW; Wu X; Tukeshov SK; Hwang K
J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 34(5):1587-1589. PubMed ID: 37253143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lip Anthropometry of Healthy Turkish Young Adults.
Bahşi I; Orhan M; Kervancioğlu P; Uçar H; Karatepe Ş; Sayin S
J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Mar-Apr 01; 33(2):696-700. PubMed ID: 34310423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Enhancing Aesthetic Harmony: Comprehensive Anthropometric Lip Measurements in Youthful and Attractive Indonesian Adults for Precision Cosmetic Procedures.
Hasibuan LY; Prasetyo AT; Pramono GNTW
JPRAS Open; 2024 Mar; 39():198-206. PubMed ID: 38293286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Photo anthropometric variations in Japanese facial features: Establishment of large-sample standard reference data for personal identification using a three-dimensional capture system.
Ogawa Y; Wada B; Taniguchi K; Miyasaka S; Imaizumi K
Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():511.e1-511.e9. PubMed ID: 26341158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anthropometric comparison of painting portraits of beautiful women, femme fatales, and artists' mothers.
Park JY; Hwang SW; Hwang K
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 24(6):2110-4. PubMed ID: 24220418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of gender, height and race on orofacial measurements.
Nascimento WV; Cassiani Rde A; Dantas RO
Codas; 2013; 25(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 24408244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anthropometric study of the caucasian nose in the city of Curitiba: relevance of population evaluation.
Ballin AC; Carvalho B; Dolci JEL; Becker R; Berger C; Mocellin M
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2018; 84(4):486-493. PubMed ID: 28728950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The attractive lip: A photomorphometric analysis.
Penna V; Fricke A; Iblher N; Eisenhardt SU; Stark GB
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Jul; 68(7):920-9. PubMed ID: 25921652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Morphological Changes in Faces Depending on Posture.
Nishioka H; Hishikawa M; Nagai F; Yuzuriha S
Facial Plast Surg; 2022 Apr; 38(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 34062567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Craniofacial features of children with celiac disease.
Selimoğlu MA; Kelleş M; Erdem T; Ertekin V; Karabiber H; Selimoğlu E
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Oct; 25(10):1206-11. PubMed ID: 23799417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of facial components on the attractiveness of face: A perception-based study.
Parul P; Kumar M; Goyal M; Mishra S; Shaha K; Abrar M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Nov; 162(5):e218-e229. PubMed ID: 36031510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation by 3D stereophotogrammetry of facial changes in edentulous patients after rehabilitation.
Toyoshima GHL; Pucciarelli MGR; Neppelenbroek KH; Sforza C; Menezes M; Oliveira TM; Soares S
J Appl Oral Sci; 2021; 30():e20210462. PubMed ID: 34932690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of reference distances used in photogrammetry.
Aksu M; Kaya D; Kocadereli I
Angle Orthod; 2010 Jul; 80(4):482-9. PubMed ID: 20482352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
