These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38843013)

  • 1. Clinical performance and safety of a debridement pad with abrasive and non-abrasive fibres.
    Stürmer E; Debus ES; Atkin L
    J Wound Care; 2024 Jun; 33(6):408-416. PubMed ID: 38843013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multicentre, clinical evaluation of a hydro-responsive wound dressing: the Glasgow experience.
    Hodgson H; Davidson D; Duncan A; Guthrie J; Henderson E; MacDiarmid M; McGown K; Pollard V; Potter R; Rodgers A; Wilson A; Horner J; Doran M; Simm S; Taylor R; Rogers A; Rippon MG; Colgrave M
    J Wound Care; 2017 Nov; 26(11):642-650. PubMed ID: 29131748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of a monofilament wound debridement pad at removing biofilm and slough: ex vivo and clinical performance.
    Schultz GS; Woo K; Weir D; Yang Q
    J Wound Care; 2018 Feb; 27(2):80-90. PubMed ID: 29424644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enzymatic wound debridement.
    Ramundo J; Gray M
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 18496083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An audit to assess the impact of prescribing a monofilament fibre debridement pad for patients with unhealed wounds after six months.
    Burnett J; Kerr A; Morrison M; Ruston A
    J Wound Care; 2021 May; 30(5):381-388. PubMed ID: 33979215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The wound debrider: a new monofilament fibre technology.
    Haemmerle G; Duelli H; Abel M; Strohal R
    Br J Nurs; 2011 Mar 24-Apr 14; 20(6):S35-6, S38, S40-2. PubMed ID: 21471903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a polyhexanide and propyl betaine-based gel in the treatment of chronic wounds.
    Durante CM; Greco A; Sidoli O; Maino C; Gallarini A; Ciprandi G
    Minerva Chir; 2014 Oct; 69(5):283-92. PubMed ID: 25267019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A purpose-designed monofilament-fibre pad for debridement of hard-to-reach wounds: experience in clinical practice.
    Dissemond J; Eberlein T; Bültemann A; Riepe G; Stoffels I; Stephen-Haynes J; Roes C; Abel M
    J Wound Care; 2018 Jul; 27(7):421-425. PubMed ID: 30016141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biofilm management using monofilament fibre debridement technology: outcomes and clinician and patient satisfaction.
    Roes C; Calladine L; Morris C
    J Wound Care; 2019 Sep; 28(9):608-622. PubMed ID: 31513491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Autolysis: mechanisms of action in the removal of devitalised tissue.
    Atkin L; Rippon M
    Br J Nurs; 2016 Nov; 25(20 Suppl):S40-S47. PubMed ID: 27834531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Debridement for surgical wounds.
    Smith F; Donaldson J; Brown T
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2024 May; 5(5):CD006214. PubMed ID: 38712723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of debriding agents in treating surgical wounds healing by secondary intention.
    Lewis R; Whiting P; ter Riet G; O'Meara S; Glanville J
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(14):1-131. PubMed ID: 11399237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical efficacy of a new monofilament fibre-containing wound debridement product.
    Bahr S; Mustafi N; Hättig P; Piatkowski A; Mosti G; Reimann K; Abel M; Dini V; Restelli J; Babadagi-Hardt Z; Abbritti F; Eberlein T; Wild T; Bandl K
    J Wound Care; 2011 May; 20(5):242-8. PubMed ID: 21647069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rapid debridement with monofilament fibre debridement technology: clinical outcomes and practitioner satisfaction.
    Roes C; Calladine L; Morris C
    J Wound Care; 2019 Aug; 28(8):534-541. PubMed ID: 31393801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving clinical outcomes and patient experience through the use of desloughing.
    Grothier L
    Br J Community Nurs; 2015 Sep; Suppl Wound Care():S25-6, S28-31. PubMed ID: 26322402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Slough and biofilm: removal of barriers to wound healing by desloughing.
    Percival SL; Suleman L
    J Wound Care; 2015 Nov; 24(11):498, 500-3, 506-10. PubMed ID: 26551642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding wound bed preparation and wound debridement.
    Ousey K; McIntosh C
    Br J Community Nurs; 2010 Mar; 15(3):S22, S24, S26, passim. PubMed ID: 20220634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding methods of wound debridement.
    Atkin L
    Br J Nurs; 2014 Jun 26-Jul 9; 23(12):S10-2, S14-5. PubMed ID: 25075385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is larval (maggot) debridement effective for removal of necrotic tissue from chronic wounds?
    Gray M
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2008; 35(4):378-84. PubMed ID: 18635985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective, open-label study to assess the clinical performance of a foam dressing in the management of chronic wounds.
    Zoellner P; Kapp H; Smola H
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2006 May; 52(5):34-6, 38, 40-2 passim. PubMed ID: 16687768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.