These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
928 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3884361)
21. Public-sector savings resulting from expenditures for contraceptive services. Forrest JD; Singh S Fam Plann Perspect; 1990; 22(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 2108877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Family planning services in the United States. Morris L Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1975; 9(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 1156710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The provision of public-sector services by family planning agencies in 1995. Frost JJ; Bolzan M Fam Plann Perspect; 1997; 29(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 9119045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Public benefits and costs of government funding for abortion. Torres A; Donovan P; Dittes N; Forrest JD Fam Plann Perspect; 1986; 18(3):111-8. PubMed ID: 3100324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Public social welfare expenditures, fiscal years 1965-87. Bixby AK Soc Secur Bull; 1990 Feb; 53(2):10-26. PubMed ID: 2315818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Grant recipients' rights in question. Willson PD Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 4(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 12266274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fertility-related state laws enacted in 1981. Donovan P Fam Plann Perspect; 1982; 14(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 7047208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions. Haas-Wilson D J Policy Anal Manage; 1993; 12(3):498-511. PubMed ID: 10127357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Family planning clinic services in the United States, 1994. Frost JJ Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(3):92-100. PubMed ID: 8827144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. School-based clinics: a national conference. Kenney AM Fam Plann Perspect; 1986; 18(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 3803548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The attempt to break down overseas population assistance: Population Crisis Committee. Camp SL Interaction; 1986 Jan; 6(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 12340678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bound and gagged: America's family planning network. Dryfoos JG J Am Health Policy; 1992; 2(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 10116482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Title X may get 10% funding increase despite cutbacks for deficit. Kaeser L Contracept Technol Update; 1994 Apr; 15(4):53-4. PubMed ID: 12318753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. More family planning and abortion services needed. Gold R Plan Parent Rev; 1984; 3(4):5. PubMed ID: 12267090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. State administration and financing of family planning services. Weinberg D Fam Plann Perspect; 1972 Apr; 4(2):32-41. PubMed ID: 5052570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Squeezing the turnip. Equitable distribution of funding to provide maternal and child health services in rural America. Dotson JA Nurs Leadersh Forum; 2002; 7(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 12683027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The economics of abortion access in the US: restrictions on government funding for abortion is the post-Roe battleground. Fried MG Conscience; 2005-2006; 26(4):11-5. PubMed ID: 16619422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The availability of reproductive health services from U.S. private physicians. Orr MT; Forrest JD Fam Plann Perspect; 1985; 17(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 3842655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]