117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38843650)
1. Design and implementation of continuous bed motion (CBM) in Xtrim preclinical PET scanner for whole-body Imaging: MC simulation and experimental measurements.
Bahadorzadeh B; Faghihi R; Sina S; Aghaz A; Rahmim A; Reza Ay M
Phys Med; 2024 Jun; 123():103395. PubMed ID: 38843650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Step-and-Shoot and Continuous-Bed-Motion PET Modes of Acquisition for Limited-View Organ Scans.
Siman W; Kappadath SC
J Nucl Med Technol; 2017 Dec; 45(4):290-296. PubMed ID: 29042468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Continuous bed motion in a silicon photomultiplier-based scanner provides equivalent spatial resolution and image quality in whole body PET images at similar acquisition times using the step-and-shoot method.
Kumamoto K; Sato H; Tsutsui Y; Awamoto S; Yamashita Y; Baba S; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2022 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 35440474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of continuous bed motion effects on patient breathing and respiratory motion correction in PET/CT imaging.
Meier JG; Erasmus JJ; Gladish GW; Peterson CB; Diab RH; Mawlawi OR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):158-165. PubMed ID: 31816183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of breathing motion on PET acquisitions: step and shoot versus continuous bed motion.
Owaki Y; Nakahara T; Shimizu T; Smith AM; Luk WK; Inoue K; Fukushi M; Nakajima K
Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jul; 39(7):665-671. PubMed ID: 29672464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Continuous bed motion on clinical scanner: design, data correction, and reconstruction.
Panin VY; Smith AM; Hu J; Kehren F; Casey ME
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 59(20):6153-74. PubMed ID: 25255170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monte Carlo evaluation of hypothetical long axial field-of-view PET scanner using GE Discovery MI PET front-end architecture.
Tiwari A; Merrick M; Graves SA; Sunderland J
Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 49(2):1139-1152. PubMed ID: 34954831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of Time-of-Flight PET/CT with a Large Axial Field of View for Reducing Whole-Body Acquisition Time.
Akamatsu G; Uba K; Taniguchi T; Mitsumoto K; Narisue A; Tsutsui Y; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2014 Jun; 42(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 24799607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simulated Reduced-Count Whole-Body FDG PET: Evaluation in Children and Young Adults Imaged on a Digital PET Scanner.
Alves VPV; Brady S; Ata NA; Li Y; MacLean J; Zhang B; Sharp SE; Trout AT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Dec; 219(6):952-961. PubMed ID: 35731102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of image quality between step-and-shoot and continuous bed motion techniques in whole-body
Yamashita S; Yamamoto H; Nakaichi T; Yoneyama T; Yokoyama K
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 31(9):686-695. PubMed ID: 28815414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. NEMA NU-4 2008 performance evaluation of Xtrim-PET: A prototype SiPM-based preclinical scanner.
Amirrashedi M; Sarkar S; Ghafarian P; Hashemi Shahraki R; Geramifar P; Zaidi H; Ay MR
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4816-4825. PubMed ID: 31448421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accurate modeling and performance evaluation of a total-body pet scanner using Monte Carlo simulations.
Rezaei H; Sheikhzadeh P; Ghafarian P; Zaidi H; Ay MR
Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):6815-6827. PubMed ID: 37665768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance characteristics of a new 3-dimensional continuous-emission and spiral-transmission high-sensitivity and high-resolution PET camera evaluated with the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard.
Matsumoto K; Kitamura K; Mizuta T; Tanaka K; Yamamoto S; Sakamoto S; Nakamoto Y; Amano M; Murase K; Senda M
J Nucl Med; 2006 Jan; 47(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 16391191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic whole-body PET parametric imaging: I. Concept, acquisition protocol optimization and clinical application.
Karakatsanis NA; Lodge MA; Tahari AK; Zhou Y; Wahl RL; Rahmim A
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(20):7391-418. PubMed ID: 24080962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance Evaluation of the uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT Scanner Based on NEMA NU 2-2018 with Additional Tests to Characterize PET Scanners with a Long Axial Field of View.
Spencer BA; Berg E; Schmall JP; Omidvari N; Leung EK; Abdelhafez YG; Tang S; Deng Z; Dong Y; Lv Y; Bao J; Liu W; Li H; Jones T; Badawi RD; Cherry SR
J Nucl Med; 2021 Jun; 62(6):861-870. PubMed ID: 33008932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accurate Monte Carlo modeling and performance assessment of the X-PET subsystem of the FLEX triumph preclinical PET/CT scanner.
Zeraatkar N; Ay MR; Kamali-Asl AR; Zaidi H
Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1217-25. PubMed ID: 21520834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomized, double-blind, crossover comparison of novel continuous bed motion versus traditional bed position whole-body PET/CT imaging.
Schatka I; Weiberg D; Reichelt S; Owsianski-Hille N; Derlin T; Berding G; Bengel FM
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2016 Apr; 43(4):711-7. PubMed ID: 26546010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance evaluation of the Biograph mCT Flow PET/CT system according to the NEMA NU2-2012 standard.
Rausch I; Cal-González J; Dapra D; Gallowitsch HJ; Lind P; Beyer T; Minear G
EJNMMI Phys; 2015 Dec; 2(1):26. PubMed ID: 26501827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Texture Feature Comparison Between Step-and-Shoot and Continuous-Bed-Motion
Yamashita S; Okuda K; Nakaichi T; Yamamoto H; Yokoyama K
J Nucl Med Technol; 2021 Mar; 49(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 33020230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Monte Carlo simulation of sensitivity and NECR of an entire-body PET scanner.
Isnaini I; Obi T; Yoshida E; Yamaya T
Radiol Phys Technol; 2014 Jul; 7(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 24366757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
