These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38843726)
1. A national survey of clinicians' opinions of rotational vaginal births. Parris DL; Jaufuraully S; Opie J; Siassakos D; Napolitano R Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Aug; 299():83-90. PubMed ID: 38843726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Babies in occiput posterior position are significantly more likely to require an emergency cesarean birth compared with babies in occiput transverse position in the second stage of labor: A prospective observational study. Tempest N; Lane S; Hapangama D; Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Apr; 99(4):537-545. PubMed ID: 31667835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intrapartum ultrasound during rotational forceps delivery: a novel tool for safety, quality control, and teaching. Hinkson L; Henrich W; Tutschek B Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 224(1):93.e1-93.e7. PubMed ID: 32693095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with pregnancies delivering by non-rotational forceps. Giacchino T; Karkia R; Zhang W; Ahmed H; Akolekar R J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Apr; 42(3):379-384. PubMed ID: 34030603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new course on assisted rotational birth and complex caesarean section - Mixed methods evaluation of Art & Craft. Jaufuraully S; Parris D; Opie J; Siassakos D Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 May; 296():126-130. PubMed ID: 38432018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with rotational ventouse or second stage caesarean section deliveries. Giacchino T; Karkia R; Zhang W; Beta J; Ahmed H; Akolekar R Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Nov; 254():175-180. PubMed ID: 32987337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Kielland's forceps. From controversy to consensus? Nash Z; Nathan B; Mascarenhas L Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jan; 94(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 25233861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maternal and neonatal complications following Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Giacchino T; Karkia R; Ahmed H; Akolekar R BJOG; 2023 Jul; 130(8):856-864. PubMed ID: 36694989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Training on Kielland's forceps: A survey of trainees' opinions. Al Wattar BH; Mahmud A; Janjua A; Parry-Smith W; Ismail KM J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Apr; 37(3):280-283. PubMed ID: 28140721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Kielland's forceps delivery: is it a dying art? Tan KH; Sim R; Yam KL Singapore Med J; 1992 Aug; 33(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 1411670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of the novel Odon Device in indicated operative vaginal birth. Hotton EJ; Lenguerrand E; Alvarez M; O'Brien S; Draycott TJ; Crofts JF; Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 224(6):607.e1-607.e17. PubMed ID: 33316274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rotational delivery of the fetus: Kielland's forceps and two other methods compared. Healy DL; Quinn MA; Pepperell RJ Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Jul; 89(7):501-6. PubMed ID: 7093162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labour. Tempest N; Hart A; Walkinshaw S; Hapangama DK BJOG; 2013 Sep; 120(10):1277-84. PubMed ID: 23906197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Management of occiput posterior position in the second stage of labour: a survey of obstetric practice in Australia and New Zealand. Phipps H; de Vries B; Lee PN; Hyett JA Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Oct; 52(5):450-4. PubMed ID: 22804812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Persistent Occiput Posterior position - OUTcomes following manual rotation (POP-OUT): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Phipps H; Hyett JA; Kuah S; Pardey J; Ludlow J; Bisits A; Park F; Kowalski D; de Vries B Trials; 2015 Mar; 16():96. PubMed ID: 25872776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The art of performing a safe forceps delivery: a skill to revitalise. Rather H; Muglu J; Veluthar L; Sivanesan K Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Apr; 199():49-54. PubMed ID: 26897398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rotational vaginal delivery with Kielland's forceps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety outcomes. Al Wattar BH; Al Wattar B; Gallos I; Pirie AM Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 27(6):438-44. PubMed ID: 26485456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Kielland's forceps: does it increase the risk of anal sphincter injuries? An observational study. Gauthaman N; Henry D; Ster IC; Khunda A; Doumouchtsis SK Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Oct; 26(10):1525-32. PubMed ID: 25990206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neonatal and maternal outcomes of successful manual rotation to correct malposition of the fetal head; A retrospective and prospective observational study. Tempest N; McGuinness N; Lane S; Hapangama DK PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176861. PubMed ID: 28489924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of manual rotation of the occiput posterior position on spontaneous vaginal delivery rate: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial (RMOS). Verhaeghe C; Parot-Schinkel E; Bouet PE; Madzou S; Biquard F; Gillard P; Descamps P; Legendre G Trials; 2018 Feb; 19(1):109. PubMed ID: 29444695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]