91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3884545)
1. Quantitative digital fluorography. Computer vs. human estimation of vascular stenoses.
Jaques P; DiBianca F; Pizer S; Kohout F; Lifshitz L; Delany D
Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 3884545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Quantification of vascular stenoses using digital subtraction angiography].
Herter M; Lackner K
Rofo; 1985 Dec; 143(6):650-5. PubMed ID: 3001855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 1996 AUR Memorial Award. Densitometric analysis of eccentric vascular stenoses: comparison of CO2 and iodinated contrast media.
Black CM; Lang EV; Kusnick CA; Siebes M; Barnhart W; Berbaum KS; Hoffman EA
Acad Radiol; 1996 Dec; 3(12):985-93. PubMed ID: 9017012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CT angiography with volume rendering for quantifying vascular stenoses: in vitro validation of accuracy.
Kuszyk BS; Heath DG; Johnson PT; Eng J; Fishman EK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Aug; 173(2):449-55. PubMed ID: 10430152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cross-sectional area measurements by digital subtraction videodensitometry.
Simons MA; Kruger RA; Power RL
Invest Radiol; 1986 Aug; 21(8):637-44. PubMed ID: 3528036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Geometry of eccentric vascular stenoses in various projections--significance for angiographic assessment of the degree of stenosis, especially using digital subtraction angiography].
Neufang KF
Digitale Bilddiagn; 1986 Dec; 6(4):187-91. PubMed ID: 3545633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Videodensitometric quantitation of stenosis: in vitro and in vivo validation.
Seibert JA; Link DP; Hines HH; Baltaxe HA
Radiology; 1985 Dec; 157(3):807-11. PubMed ID: 3903860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative coronary arteriography: design and validation.
Ratib OM; Mankovich NJ
Radiology; 1988 Jun; 167(3):743-7. PubMed ID: 3363133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accurate analysis of blood vessel sizes and stenotic lesions using stereoscopic DSA system.
Fencil LE; Doi K; Hoffman KR
Invest Radiol; 1988 Jan; 23(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 3276645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital subtraction angiography and its application in children.
Capitanio MA; Faerber EN; Gainey MA; Wolfson BJ
Pediatr Clin North Am; 1985 Dec; 32(6):1449-60. PubMed ID: 3906533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical application of hybrid subtraction digital angiography: preliminary results.
Guthaner DF; Brody WR; Lewis BD; Keyes GS; Belanger BF
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1983; 6(4-6):290-4. PubMed ID: 6360370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the efficacy of digital subtraction and film-screen angiography of the lower limb: prospective study in 50 patients.
Smith TP; Cragg AH; Berbaum KS; Nakagawa N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):431-6. PubMed ID: 1729803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 13. Effect of simple structured noise on the detectability of simulated stenotic lesions.
Ohara K; Doi K; Metz CE; Giger ML
Med Phys; 1989; 16(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 2646515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A procedure for taking into account scattered radiation and scattered light in the densitometric determination of intravascular iodine content].
Schüller H; Leipner N; Rollmann O; Harder T
Rofo; 1987 Aug; 147(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 2819981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Resolving power of digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Measurements of opacification with different blood vessel calibers and constrictions in relation to contrast media concentration].
Schultz E; Fischer P
Rofo; 1983 Sep; 139(3):296-9. PubMed ID: 6411550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification of vascular stenosis with color Doppler flow imaging: in vitro investigations.
Landwehr P; Schindler R; Heinrich U; Dölken W; Krahe T; Lackner K
Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):701-4. PubMed ID: 1994406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital subtraction angiography in postoperative evaluation of peripheral vascular disease.
Stacul F; Maffessanti M; Pozzi-Mucelli R; Dalla-Palma L
Eur J Radiol; 1984 Feb; 4(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 6373259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Noise in stenosis measurement using digital subtraction angiography.
Wright GA; Taylor KW; Rowlands JA
Med Phys; 1985; 12(6):705-12. PubMed ID: 3908890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative digital subtraction coronary angiography using videodensitometry. An in vivo analysis.
Simons MA; Muskett AD; Kruger RA; Klausner SC; Burton NA; Nelson JA
Invest Radiol; 1988 Feb; 23(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 3277924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital subtraction angiography.
Mattern RF; Jewel KL; Knitzer C; Loigman BI; Royer CC; Whelan CA
J Med Soc N J; 1983 Mar; 80(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 6575180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
