These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38845868)

  • 1. Computational and experimental study on the aerodynamic performance of NACA 4412 airfoil with slot and groove.
    Rayhan AM; Hossain MS; Mim RH; Ali M
    Heliyon; 2024 Jun; 10(11):e31595. PubMed ID: 38845868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation of a bio-inspired lift-enhancing effector on a 2D airfoil.
    Johnston J; Gopalarathnam A
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2012 Sep; 7(3):036003. PubMed ID: 22498691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Covert-inspired flaps for lift enhancement and stall mitigation.
    Duan C; Wissa A
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2021 Jun; 16(4):. PubMed ID: 33784648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Flow Control around the UAS-S45 Pitching Airfoil Using a Dynamically Morphing Leading Edge (DMLE): A Numerical Study.
    Bashir M; Zonzini N; Botez RM; Ceruti A; Wong T
    Biomimetics (Basel); 2023 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 36810382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal design of aeroacoustic airfoils with owl-inspired trailing-edge serrations.
    Zhao M; Cao H; Zhang M; Liao C; Zhou T
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2021 Jul; 16(5):. PubMed ID: 34020442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of Leading Edge Defect on the Aerodynamic and Flow Characteristics of an S809 Airfoil.
    Wang Y; Zheng X; Hu R; Wang P
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0163443. PubMed ID: 27658310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computational Investigations on the Effects of Gurney Flap on Airfoil Aerodynamics.
    Jain S; Sitaram N; Krishnaswamy S
    Int Sch Res Notices; 2015; 2015():402358. PubMed ID: 27347517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A UDF-Based Approach for the Dynamic Stall Evaluation of Airfoils for Micro-Air Vehicles.
    Sterpu DA; Măriuța D; Grigorie LT
    Biomimetics (Basel); 2024 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 38921219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental investigation of trailing edge noise from stationary and rotating airfoils.
    Zajamsek B; Doolan CJ; Moreau DJ; Fischer J; Prime Z
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3291. PubMed ID: 28599535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental investigation of multi-step airfoils in low Reynolds numbers applications.
    Aziz MA; Gaheen OA; Benini E; Elsayed AM
    Heliyon; 2024 Jun; 10(12):e32919. PubMed ID: 38994047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A computational study of the aerodynamic performance of a dragonfly wing section in gliding flight.
    Vargas A; Mittal R; Dong H
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2008 Jun; 3(2):026004. PubMed ID: 18503106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of the shape of flapping airfoils on aerodynamic forces.
    Butt F; Talha T; Khan R; Mazhar AR; Butt M; Petru J; Seikh AH
    Heliyon; 2024 Apr; 10(8):e29561. PubMed ID: 38665583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preliminary assessment of the NACA0021 trailing edge wedge for wind turbine application.
    Abdalkarem AAM; Ansaf R; Muzammil WK; Ibrahim A; Harun Z; Fazlizan A
    Heliyon; 2023 Nov; 9(11):e21193. PubMed ID: 37942161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 2D numerical investigations derived from a 3D dragonfly wing captured with a high-resolution micro-CT.
    Stelzer V; Krenkel L
    Technol Health Care; 2022; 30(1):283-289. PubMed ID: 34806640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wind-tunnel tests of synthetic jet control effects on airfoil flow separation.
    Zhao G; Zhao Q; Chen X
    Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21994. PubMed ID: 36539417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental study of a passive control of airfoil lift using bioinspired feather flap.
    Wang L; Alam MM; Zhou Y
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2019 Sep; 14(6):066005. PubMed ID: 31434057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Some effects of domain size and boundary conditions on the accuracy of airfoil simulations.
    Golmirzaee N; Wood DH
    Adv Aerodyn; 2024; 6(1):7. PubMed ID: 38464493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parameter study of simplified dragonfly airfoil geometry at Reynolds number of 6000.
    Levy DE; Seifert A
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Oct; 266(4):691-702. PubMed ID: 20673771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aerodynamics of the flying snake Chrysopelea paradisi: how a bluff body cross-sectional shape contributes to gliding performance.
    Holden D; Socha JJ; Cardwell ND; Vlachos PP
    J Exp Biol; 2014 Feb; 217(Pt 3):382-94. PubMed ID: 24477611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CFD study on NACA 4415 airfoil implementing spherical and sinusoidal Tubercle Leading Edge.
    Aftab SMA; Ahmad KA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0183456. PubMed ID: 28850622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.