These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38846310)

  • 21. Agreement between CT-Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography in Predicting Angiographic Vasospasm in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.
    Moser MM; Gramss L; Marik W; Weber M; Hirschmann D; Wang WT; Dodier P; Kasprian G; Bavinzski G; Rössler K; Hosmann A
    J Clin Med; 2024 Jun; 13(13):. PubMed ID: 38999308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Proximal arterial diameters on CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography correlate both at admission and in the vasospasm period after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
    Kerkeni H; Schatlo B; Dan-Ura H; Remonda L; Muroi C; Diepers M; Fandino J; Fathi AR
    Acta Neurochir Suppl; 2015; 120():171-5. PubMed ID: 25366619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Non-invasive evaluation of proximal vertebral artery stenosis using color Doppler sonography and CT angiography.
    Škoda O; Kalvach P; Procházka B; Svárovský M
    J Neuroradiol; 2014 Dec; 41(5):336-41. PubMed ID: 24388394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Surveillance imaging after intracranial stent implantation: non-invasive imaging compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Golshani B; Lazzaro MA; Raslau F; Darkhabani Z; Baruah D; Eastwood D; Fitzsimmons BF; Zaidat OO
    J Neurointerv Surg; 2013 Jul; 5(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 22641863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of 3D magnetic resonance imaging and digital subtraction angiography for intracranial artery stenosis.
    Park JE; Jung SC; Lee SH; Jeon JY; Lee JY; Kim HS; Choi CG; Kim SJ; Lee DH; Kim SO; Kwon SU; Kang DW; Kim JS
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Nov; 27(11):4737-4746. PubMed ID: 28500366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Modified Dual-Energy Algorithm for Calcified Plaque Removal: Evaluation in Carotid Computed Tomography Angiography and Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography.
    Mannil M; Ramachandran J; Vittoria de Martini I; Wegener S; Schmidt B; Flohr T; Krauss B; Valavanis A; Alkadhi H; Winklhofer S
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Nov; 52(11):680-685. PubMed ID: 28542096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Arterial endofibrosis in endurance athletes: Prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography and computed tomography angiography.
    Perrier L; Feugier P; Goutain-Majorel C; Girouin N; Boutier R; Papillard M; Bedel M; Rabilloud M; Rouvière O
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020; 101(7-8):463-471. PubMed ID: 32245721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Computed tomographic angiography versus digital subtraction angiography for the diagnosis and early treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.
    Anderson GB; Steinke DE; Petruk KC; Ashforth R; Findlay JM
    Neurosurgery; 1999 Dec; 45(6):1315-20; discussion 1320-2. PubMed ID: 10598698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Duplex ultrasound versus CT angiography for the treatment planning of lower-limb arterial disease.
    Martinelli O; Alunno A; Drudi FM; Malaj A; Irace L
    J Ultrasound; 2021 Dec; 24(4):471-479. PubMed ID: 33165702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of Noncontrast Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Lower Extremity MR Angiography Versus CT Angiography for Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease: Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography.
    Varga-Szemes A; Wichmann JL; Schoepf UJ; Suranyi P; De Cecco CN; Muscogiuri G; Caruso D; Yamada RT; Litwin SE; Tesche C; Duguay TM; Giri S; Vliegenthart R; Todoran TM
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Oct; 10(10 Pt A):1116-1124. PubMed ID: 28109932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of digital subtraction angiography and computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of penetrating cerebrovascular injury.
    Ares WJ; Jankowitz BT; Tonetti DA; Gross BA; Grandhi R
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Nov; 47(5):E16. PubMed ID: 31675711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Agreement of intracranial vessel diameters measured on 2D and 3D digital subtraction angiography using an automatic windowing algorithm.
    Abe Y; Yuki I; Otani K; Shoji T; Ishibashi T; Murayama Y
    J Neuroradiol; 2021 Jun; 48(4):311-315. PubMed ID: 31563590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomographic angiography and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant transplant renal artery stenosis.
    Gaddikeri S; Mitsumori L; Vaidya S; Hippe DS; Bhargava P; Dighe MK
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2014; 43(4):162-8. PubMed ID: 24948209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. CT angiographic analysis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of manual assessment, semiautomatic vessel analysis, and digital subtraction angiography.
    Silvennoinen HM; Ikonen S; Soinne L; Railo M; Valanne L
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 17213433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy.
    Patel SG; Collie DA; Wardlaw JM; Lewis SC; Wright AR; Gibson RJ; Sellar RJ
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2002 Jul; 73(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 12082040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography digital subtraction angiography of the lower extremities during haemodialysis in patients with suspected peripheral artery disease.
    Masuda T; Funama Y; Nakaura T; Sato T; Okimoto T; Masuda S; Yamashita Y; Yoshiura T; Noda N; Baba Y; Awai K
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 Aug; 27(3):888-896. PubMed ID: 33820690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Value of the CT angiography in the diagnosis of common carotid artery bifurcation disease: CT angiography versus digital subtraction angiography and color flow Doppler.
    Moll R; Dinkel HP
    Eur J Radiol; 2001 Sep; 39(3):155-62. PubMed ID: 11566242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The utility of dual-energy computed tomography angiography for the evaluation of brain aneurysms after endovascular coiling: a prospective study.
    Dolati P; Ogilvy CS
    Acta Radiol; 2023 Jul; 64(7):2334-2342. PubMed ID: 34970934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Plaques Using 3D Black-Blood MRI: Comparison With 3D Time-of-Flight MRA and DSA.
    Tian X; Tian B; Shi Z; Wu X; Peng W; Zhang X; Malhotra A; Mossa-Basha M; Sekhar L; Liu Q; Lu J; Hu C; Zhu C
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Feb; 53(2):469-478. PubMed ID: 32864816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dual-energy direct bone removal CT angiography for evaluation of intracranial aneurysm or stenosis: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography.
    Watanabe Y; Uotani K; Nakazawa T; Higashi M; Yamada N; Hori Y; Kanzaki S; Fukuda T; Itoh T; Naito H
    Eur Radiol; 2009 Apr; 19(4):1019-24. PubMed ID: 19002466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.