116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38847419)
1. Evaluation of uncertainty in personal dose measured using CaSO4:Dy-based TLD badge at different workplaces.
Pradhan SM; Pathan MS; Chakrabarty S; Selvam TP; Sapra BK
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 Jun; 200(10):890-900. PubMed ID: 38847419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of an algorithm for evaluating personal doses due to photon fields in terms of operational quantities for TLD badge system in India.
Pradhan SM; Sneha C; Chourasiya G; Adtani MM; Tripathi SM; Singh SK
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Sep; 136(3):176-84. PubMed ID: 19755432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Studies on the response of the TLD badge for high-energy photons.
Kumar M; Kher RK; Sahni G; Chhokra K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 17681962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A STUDY ON THE UNCERTAINTY FOR THE ROUTINE DOSIMETRY SERVICE AT THE LEBANESE ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION USING HARSHAW 8814 DOSEMETERS.
Rizk C; Vanhavere F
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):168-72. PubMed ID: 26443544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose equivalent response of a TLD badge--influence of body backscatter.
Pradhan AS; Gambhir SP; Patel PH; Bhatt RC; Supe SJ
Health Phys; 1990 Sep; 59(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 2394587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. DOSIMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE NEW TLD ALBEDO NEUTRON DOSEMETER AWST-TL-GD 04.
Haninger T; Henniger J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):150-3. PubMed ID: 26405220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. UNCERTAINTY EVALUATION FOR MULTIDETECTOR PASSIVE DOSEMETERS USING A TWO-STAGE MEASUREMENT MODEL AND THE MONTE CARLO METHOD.
van Dijk JW
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):74-7. PubMed ID: 26656080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of a TL detector for neutron measurement by CaSO4:Dy phosphors.
Yang JS; Kim JL; Kim DY; Chang SY
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):301-4. PubMed ID: 15353663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ENVIRONMENTAL DOSIMETRY WITH THE BeOSL PERSONAL DOSEMETER.
Jahn A; Sommer M; Henniger J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):346-9. PubMed ID: 27060113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. X- and gamma-ray response of the TLD badge based on CaSO4:Dy Teflon TLD discs.
Vohra KG; Pradhan AS; Bhatt RC
Health Phys; 1982 Sep; 43(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 7174332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF SOLID FORMS OF CaSO4:Dy THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSEMETERS IN RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY-A REVIEW.
Lakshmanan A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Oct; 181(2):57-99. PubMed ID: 30239880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. INTERCOMPARISON ON THE MEASUREMENT OF THE QUANTITY PERSONAL DOSE EQUIVALENT HP(10) IN PHOTON FIELDS. LINEARITY DEPENDENCE, LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION AND UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT OF DOSIMETRY SYSTEMS OF INDIVIDUAL MONITORING SERVICES IN GABON AND GHANA.
Ondo Meye P; Schandorf C; Amoako JK; Manteaw PO; Amoatey EA; Adjei DN
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Dec; 177(3):250-260. PubMed ID: 28402513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. DEVELOPMENT OF AN ALGORITHM TO ESTIMATE EYE LENS DOSE IN TERMS OF OPERATIONAL QUANTITY Hp(3) USING HEAD TLD BADGE.
Madhumita B; Sneha C; Dipali V; Pradhan SM; Bakshi AK; Datta D; Tripathi SM; Singh SK
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Mar; 178(4):364-373. PubMed ID: 28981726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Operational experience of electronic active personal dosemeter and comparison with CaSo4:Dy TL dosemeter in Indian PHWR.
Singh VP; Managanvi SS; Bihari RR; Bhat HR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013; 156(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 23528326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ESTIMATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT OF DOSE EQUIVALENT AT LABORATORY LEVEL USING CASO4 :Dy-BASED TLD BADGE SYSTEM IN INDIA.
Pradhan SM; Datta D; Pathan MS; Srivastava K; Selvam TP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jun; 188(2):135-147. PubMed ID: 31832666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of an algorithm for TLD badge system for dosimetry in the field of X and gamma radiation in terms of Hp(10).
Bakshi AK; Srivastava K; Varadharajan G; Pradhan AS; Kher RK
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(2):148-55. PubMed ID: 16984896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 2240 IRRADIATED PERSONAL DOSEMETERS FOR THE IC2014 EURADOS INTERCOMPARISON AT SEIBERSDORF.
Hranitzky C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):27-30. PubMed ID: 26311703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Uncertainties associated with the use of optically stimulated luminescence in personal dosimetry.
Benevides L; Romanyukha A; Hull F; Duffy M; Voss S; Moscovitch M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):165-7. PubMed ID: 21450702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. EVOLUTION OF THE IEC AND EN STANDARDS FOR INDIVIDUAL MONITORING OF IONISING RADIATION.
Voytchev M; Behrens R; Ambrosi P; Radev R; Chiaro P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):13-6. PubMed ID: 26443545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EDEL: ENEA DOSEMETER FOR EYE LENS.
Ferrari P; Mariotti F; Campani L
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 170(1-4):145-9. PubMed ID: 26170436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
