BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38847827)

  • 1. Effect of processing speed and memory performance on classification accuracy of the dot counting test in a mixed neuropsychiatric sample.
    Phillips MS; Wisinger AM; Cerny BM; Khan H; Chang F; Tse KYP; Ovsiew GP; Resch ZJ; Shapiro G; Soble JR; Jennette KJ
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2024 Jun; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 38847827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Every second counts: A comparison of four dot counting test scoring procedures for detecting invalid neuropsychological test performance.
    Rhoads T; Resch ZJ; Ovsiew GP; White DJ; Abramson DA; Soble JR
    Psychol Assess; 2021 Feb; 33(2):133-141. PubMed ID: 33119378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of alternative dot counting test E-score cutoffs based on degree of cognitive impairment in veteran and civilian clinical samples.
    Hansen ND; Rhoads T; Jennette KJ; Reynolds TP; Ovsiew GP; Resch ZJ; Critchfield EA; Marceaux JC; O'Rourke JJF; Soble JR
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2023 Feb; 37(2):402-415. PubMed ID: 35343379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-validation of non-memory-based embedded performance validity tests for detecting invalid performance among patients with and without neurocognitive impairment.
    White DJ; Korinek D; Bernstein MT; Ovsiew GP; Resch ZJ; Soble JR
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2020 Jul; 42(5):459-472. PubMed ID: 32397824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Dot Counting Test adds up: Validation and response pattern analysis in a mixed clinical veteran sample.
    Soble JR; Santos OA; Bain KM; Kirton JW; Bailey KC; Critchfield EA; O'Rourke JJF; Highsmith JM; González DA
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2018 May; 40(4):317-325. PubMed ID: 28656790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Not so fast! Limitations of processing speed and working memory indices as embedded performance validity tests in a mixed neuropsychiatric sample.
    Ovsiew GP; Resch ZJ; Nayar K; Williams CP; Soble JR
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2020 Jul; 42(5):473-484. PubMed ID: 32498648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-validation of the Trail Making Test as a non-memory-based embedded performance validity test among veterans with and without cognitive impairment.
    Peak AM; Marceaux JC; Chicota-Carroll C; Soble JR
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2024 Feb; 46(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 38007610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cross-validating the Dot Counting Test Among an Adult ADHD Clinical Sample and Analyzing the Effect of ADHD Subtype and Comorbid Psychopathology.
    Abramson DA; White DJ; Rhoads T; Carter DA; Hansen ND; Resch ZJ; Jennette KJ; Ovsiew GP; Soble JR
    Assessment; 2023 Mar; 30(2):264-273. PubMed ID: 34643101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When Time is of the Essence: Preliminary Findings for a Quick Administration of the Dot Counting Test.
    Bailey KC; Webber TA; Phillips JI; Kraemer LDR; Marceaux JC; Soble JR
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2021 Apr; 36(3):403-413. PubMed ID: 31740920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impaired or invalid? Limitations of assessing performance validity using the Boston Naming Test.
    Abramson DA; Resch ZJ; Ovsiew GP; White DJ; Bernstein MT; Basurto KS; Soble JR
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2022; 29(4):486-491. PubMed ID: 32538174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychometric implications of failure on one performance validity test: a cross-validation study to inform criterion group definition.
    Rhoads T; Neale AC; Resch ZJ; Cohen CD; Keezer RD; Cerny BM; Jennette KJ; Ovsiew GP; Soble JR
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2021 Jul; 43(5):437-448. PubMed ID: 34233580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing the Psychometric Properties of Eight Embedded Performance Validity Tests in the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Wechsler Memory Scale Logical Memory, and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised Recognition Trials for Detecting Invalid Neuropsychological Test Performance.
    Pliskin JI; DeDios Stern S; Resch ZJ; Saladino KF; Ovsiew GP; Carter DA; Soble JR
    Assessment; 2021 Dec; 28(8):1871-1881. PubMed ID: 32484371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utility of various WAIS-IV Digit Span indices for identifying noncredible performance validity among cognitively impaired and unimpaired examinees.
    Webber TA; Soble JR
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2018 May; 32(4):657-670. PubMed ID: 29256334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Convergent, Discriminant, and Concurrent Validity of Nonmemory-Based Performance Validity Tests.
    Webber TA; Critchfield EA; Soble JR
    Assessment; 2020 Oct; 27(7):1399-1415. PubMed ID: 30293445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cognitive impairment does not cause invalid performance: analyzing performance patterns among cognitively unimpaired, impaired, and noncredible participants across six performance validity tests.
    Critchfield E; Soble JR; Marceaux JC; Bain KM; Chase Bailey K; Webber TA; Alex Alverson W; Messerly J; Andrés González D; O'Rourke JJF
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2019 Aug; 33(6):1083-1101. PubMed ID: 30475095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of visual memory impairment on Victoria Symptom Validity Test performance: A known-groups analysis.
    Stocks JK; Shields AN; DeBoer AB; Cerny BM; Ogram Buckley CM; Ovsiew GP; Jennette KJ; Resch ZJ; Basurto KS; Song W; Pliskin NH; Soble JR
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2022 Jan; ():1-10. PubMed ID: 34985401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Direct Comparison of 10 WAIS-IV Digit Span Embedded Validity Indicators among a Mixed Neuropsychiatric Sample with Varying Degrees of Cognitive Impairment.
    Resch ZJ; Cerny BM; Ovsiew GP; Jennette KJ; Bing-Canar H; Rhoads T; Soble JR
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2023 May; 38(4):619-632. PubMed ID: 36244241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance validity of the Dot Counting Test in a dementia clinic setting.
    Monjazeb S; Crowell TA
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2023 Apr; ():1-11. PubMed ID: 37119265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using the Grooved Pegboard Test as an Embedded Validity Indicator in a Mixed Neuropsychiatric Sample with Varying Cognitive Impairment: Cross-Validation Problems.
    Chang F; Cerny BM; Tse PKY; Rauch AA; Khan H; Phillips MS; Fletcher NB; Resch ZJ; Ovsiew GP; Jennette KJ; Soble JR
    Percept Mot Skills; 2023 Apr; 130(2):770-789. PubMed ID: 36634223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Standalone Performance Validity Tests May Be Differentially Related to Measures of Working Memory, Processing Speed, and Verbal Memory in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis.
    Lace JW; Sanborn V; Galioto R
    Assessment; 2024 Apr; 31(3):732-744. PubMed ID: 37303186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.