108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38849880)
1. Does the use of acellular dermal matrices (ADM) in women undergoing pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction increase operative success versus non-use of ADM in the same setting? A systematic review protocol.
Cook H; Zargaran D; Glynou SP; Hamilton S; Mosahebi A
Syst Rev; 2024 Jun; 13(1):153. PubMed ID: 38849880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.
Negenborn VL; Young-Afat DA; Dikmans REG; Smit JM; Winters HAH; Don Griot JPW; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Lapid O; Moerman E; van Turnhout AAWM; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 30104147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
Dikmans RE; Negenborn VL; Bouman MB; Winters HA; Twisk JW; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MA; Smit JM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NA; van Steveninck-Barends JM; Meesters-Caberg MA; van der Hulst RR; Ritt MJ; Mullender MG
Lancet Oncol; 2017 Feb; 18(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 28012977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy With and Without Acellular Dermal Matrix Among Women With Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Johansson H; Roy PG; Brandberg Y; Frisell J
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Oct; 4(10):e2127806. PubMed ID: 34596671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after implant-based breast reconstruction with or without acellular dermal matrix: randomized clinical trial.
Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Johansson H; Roy PG; Frisell J; Brandberg Y
BJS Open; 2020 Oct; 4(5):811-820. PubMed ID: 32762012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Review: Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Studies Comparing Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) Versus Without ADM.
Ng TP; Loo BYK; Yong N; Chia CLK; Lohsiriwat V
Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 May; 31(5):3366-3376. PubMed ID: 38285304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early complications and implant loss in implant-based breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix (Tecnoss Protexa®): a comparative study.
Potter S; Chambers A; Govindajulu S; Sahu A; Warr R; Cawthorn S
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 24011501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implant Based Breast Reconstruction Using a Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh (TiLOOP® Bra): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Zhang T; Ye J; Tian T
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2024 Mar; 48(5):925-935. PubMed ID: 37464216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Evolving Role of Pre-pectoral ADM-assisted Approach in Implant-based Immediate Breast Reconstruction Following Conservative Mastectomy: An Overview of the Literature and Description of Technique.
Wazir U; Mokbel K
In Vivo; 2018; 32(6):1477-1480. PubMed ID: 30348704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Short-term cost-effectiveness of one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage expander-implant reconstruction from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.
Negenborn VL; Smit JM; Dikmans REG; Winters HAH; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NAS; van Steveninck-Barends JM; van der Hulst RRWJ; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
Br J Surg; 2019 Apr; 106(5):586-595. PubMed ID: 30835827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implant Based Breast Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Matrix: Safety Data From an Open-label, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial in the Setting of Breast Cancer Treatment.
Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Roy PG; Johansson H; Brandberg Y; Eriksen C; Frisell J
Ann Surg; 2019 May; 269(5):836-841. PubMed ID: 30308615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing post-surgical outcomes of pre-pectoral versus dual-plane direct-to-implant breast reconstruction without increasing the use of acellular dermal matrix.
Patel R; Somogyi RB
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Mar; 75(3):1123-1129. PubMed ID: 34916161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pre-Pectoral One-Stage Breast Reconstruction with Anterior Coverage Using Superior Anterior Biological Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) and Inferior Anterior Dermal Sling Support.
Sisti A; Sadeghi P; Cuomo R; Alvarez SM
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Jul; 58(8):. PubMed ID: 35893107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Immediate Breast Cancer Reconstruction with or without Dermal Matrix or Synthetic Mesh Support: A Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Murphy D; O'Donnell JP; Ryan ÉJ; Lane O'Neill B; Boland MR; Lowery AJ; Kerin MJ; McInerney NM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Apr; 151(4):563e-574e. PubMed ID: 36729988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pre-pectoral Immediate Breast Reconstruction Following Conservative Mastectomy Using Acellular Dermal Matrix and Semi-smooth Implants.
Wazir U; Patani N; Heeney J; Mokbel K; Mokbel K
Anticancer Res; 2022 Feb; 42(2):1013-1018. PubMed ID: 35093902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Multi Centre Canadian Acellular Dermal Matrix Trial (MCCAT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in implant-based breast reconstruction.
Zhong T; Temple-Oberle C; Hofer SO; Beber B; Semple J; Brown M; Macadam S; Lennox P; Panzarella T; McCarthy C; Baxter N;
Trials; 2013 Oct; 14():356. PubMed ID: 24165392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pre-pectoral Breast Reconstruction: Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Two-Stages vs Single-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
Zingaretti N; Piana M; Battellino L; Galvano F; De Francesco F; Riccio M; Beorchia Y; Castriotta L; Parodi PC
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2024 May; 48(9):1759-1772. PubMed ID: 37644192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of an evidence-based approach to the use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate expander-implant-based breast reconstruction.
Ganesh Kumar N; Berlin NL; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Kozlow JH; Wilkins EG
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Jan; 74(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 33172826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. BROWSE: A multicentre comparison of nine year outcomes in acellular dermal matrix based and complete submuscular implant-based immediate breast reconstruction-aesthetics, capsular contracture and patient reported outcomes.
Wilson RL; Kirwan CC; O'Donoghue JM; Linforth RA; Johnson RK; Harvey JR
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jan; 48(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 34836730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A direct comparison of porcine (Strattice™) and bovine (Surgimend™) acellular dermal matrices in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction.
Ball JF; Sheena Y; Tarek Saleh DM; Forouhi P; Benyon SL; Irwin MS; Malata CM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Aug; 70(8):1076-1082. PubMed ID: 28624524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
