These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38850004)
1. In Reply to the Letter to the Editor Regarding: "The Utility of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring in Predicting Postoperative Supplementary Motor Area Syndrome and Motor Function Recovery". Tiefenbach J; Eichberg DG World Neurosurg; 2024 Jun; 186():277. PubMed ID: 38850004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In Reply to the 'In Reply to the Letter to the Editor Regarding: The Utility of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring in Predicting Postoperative Supplementary Motor Area Syndrome and Motor Function Recovery. Fava E World Neurosurg; 2024 Sep; 189():518. PubMed ID: 39252354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Letter to the Editor Regarding: The Utility of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring in Predicting Postoperative Supplementary Motor Area Syndrome and Motor Function Recovery. Fava E World Neurosurg; 2024 Jun; 186():276. PubMed ID: 38850003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Utility of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring in Predicting Postoperative Supplementary Motor Area Syndrome and Motor Function Recovery. Di L; Tiefenbach J; McCarthy DJ; Sedighim S; Dagal A; Blandino CF; Luther EM; Lu VM; Ivan ME; Komotar RJ; Eichberg DG; Shah AH World Neurosurg; 2024 Mar; 183():e892-e899. PubMed ID: 38237803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Poststroke Motor Recovery: Challenges and Opportunities. Feng W; Kautz SA; Schlaug G; Meinzer C; George MS; Chhatbar PY PM R; 2018 Sep; 10(9 Suppl 2):S157-S164. PubMed ID: 30269802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An Alternative Transcranial Motor Evoked Potential Montage to Minimize Ipsilateral "Crossover" Motor Responses. Chen JH; Gonzalez AA; Shilian P; Cheongsiatmoy J Neurodiagn J; 2018; 58(4):218-225. PubMed ID: 30388936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of 10 Hz and 20 Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on Automatic Motor Control. Cappon D; D'Ostilio K; Garraux G; Rothwell J; Bisiacchi P Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(4):518-24. PubMed ID: 27038707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the supplementary motor area (SMA) influences performance on motor tasks. Hupfeld KE; Ketcham CJ; Schneider HD Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):851-859. PubMed ID: 27909747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of single-session cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on tic symptoms in Tourette's syndrome. Dyke K; Jackson GM; Nixon E; Jackson SR Exp Brain Res; 2019 Nov; 237(11):2853-2863. PubMed ID: 31463531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The prognostic value of motor-evoked potentials in motor recovery and functional outcome after stroke − a systematic review of the literature. Bembenek JP; Kurczych K; Karli Nski M; Czlonkowska A Funct Neurol; 2012; 27(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 23158578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with transcranial direct current stimulation on motor function and cortex excitability in subacute stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. Gong Y; Long XM; Xu Y; Cai XY; Ye M Clin Rehabil; 2021 May; 35(5):718-727. PubMed ID: 33222502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Higher success rate with transcranial electrical stimulation of motor-evoked potentials using constant-voltage stimulation compared with constant-current stimulation in patients undergoing spinal surgery. Shigematsu H; Kawaguchi M; Hayashi H; Takatani T; Iwata E; Tanaka M; Okuda A; Morimoto Y; Masuda K; Tanaka Y; Tanaka Y Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1472-1479. PubMed ID: 28483707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison between threshold criterion and amplitude criterion in transcranial motor evoked potentials during surgery for supratentorial lesions. Abboud T; Schwarz C; Westphal M; Martens T J Neurosurg; 2019 Sep; 131(3):740-749. PubMed ID: 30192199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation to Enhance Post-Stroke Recovery. Kubis N Front Neural Circuits; 2016; 10():56. PubMed ID: 27512367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differential effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal, motor and somatosensory cortices on cortical excitability and pain perception - a double-blind randomised sham-controlled study. Vaseghi B; Zoghi M; Jaberzadeh S Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 42(7):2426-37. PubMed ID: 26275236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cathodal tDCS on the motor area decreases the tactile threshold of the distal pulp of the hallux. Yamamoto S; Ishii D; Ichiba N; Yozu A; Kohno Y Neurosci Lett; 2020 Feb; 719():133887. PubMed ID: 30339919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the supplementary motor area body weight-supported treadmill gait training in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Manji A; Amimoto K; Matsuda T; Wada Y; Inaba A; Ko S Neurosci Lett; 2018 Jan; 662():302-305. PubMed ID: 29107706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]