These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3885105)

  • 1. Routine ultrasound screening for the prediction of gestational age.
    Campbell S; Warsof SL; Little D; Cooper DJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 May; 65(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 3885105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasound dating at 12-14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in in-vitro fertilized pregnancies.
    Sladkevicius P; Saltvedt S; Almström H; Kublickas M; Grunewald C; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Oct; 26(5):504-11. PubMed ID: 16149101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of gestational age after the 24th week of gestation from fetal kidney length measurements.
    Konje JC; Abrams KR; Bell SC; Taylor DJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 19(6):592-7. PubMed ID: 12047540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal crown-rump length and estimation of gestational age in an ethnic Chinese population.
    Sahota DS; Leung TY; Leung TN; Chan OK; Lau TK
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 19115262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Routine ultrasound screening for antenatal detection of intrauterine growth retardation.
    Warsof SL; Cooper DJ; Little D; Campbell S
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jan; 67(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 3510015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison between ultrasound and a reliable last menstrual period as predictors of the day of delivery in 15,000 examinations.
    Tunón K; Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Sep; 8(3):178-85. PubMed ID: 8915087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Underestimation of gestational age by conventional crown-rump length dating curves.
    MacGregor SN; Tamura RK; Sabbagha RE; Minogue JP; Gibson ME; Hoffman DI
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Sep; 70(3 Pt 1):344-8. PubMed ID: 3306495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gestational age in pregnancies conceived after in vitro fertilization: a comparison between age assessed from oocyte retrieval, crown-rump length and biparietal diameter.
    Tunón K; Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P; Von Düring V; Kahn JA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jan; 15(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 10776011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasonic methods of predicting the estimated date of confinement.
    Kopta MM; Tomich PG; Crane JP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 May; 57(5):657-60. PubMed ID: 7219916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biparietal diameter and crown-rump length in fetuses with Down's syndrome: implications for antenatal serum screening for Down's syndrome.
    Wald NJ; Smith D; Kennard A; Palomaki GE; Salonen R; Holzgreve W; Pejtsik B; Coombes EJ; Mancini G; MacRae AR
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 May; 100(5):430-5. PubMed ID: 8518242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of delivery date by sonography in the first and second trimesters.
    Olesen AW; Thomsen SG
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 16865679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of obstetric ultrasound to determine the most suitable parameters for the aging of formalin-fixed human fetuses using manual measurements.
    Croft MS; Desai G; Seed PT; Pollard JI; Perry ME
    Clin Anat; 1999; 12(2):84-93. PubMed ID: 10089033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accurate gestational dating: revisited.
    Ott WJ
    Am J Perinatol; 1994 Nov; 11(6):404-8. PubMed ID: 7857430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the ability of a sonographically measured biparietal diameter and the last menstrual period to predict the spontaneous onset of labor.
    Waldenström U; Axelsson O; Nilsson S
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Sep; 76(3 Pt 1):336-8. PubMed ID: 2199864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early fetal size and growth as predictors of adverse outcome.
    Pedersen NG; Figueras F; Wøjdemann KR; Tabor A; Gardosi J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 112(4):765-71. PubMed ID: 18827118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The present place of routine ultrasound screening.
    Warsof SL; Pearce JM; Campbell S
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1983 Dec; 10(3):445-57. PubMed ID: 6653028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fetal crown-rump length or biparietal diameter for assessing gestational age in the 13th and 14th week: a comparison.
    Pedersen JF
    Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 1987; 104():165-7. PubMed ID: 3481466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of LMP-based and ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using linked California livebirth and prenatal screening records.
    Dietz PM; England LJ; Callaghan WM; Pearl M; Wier ML; Kharrazi M
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():62-71. PubMed ID: 17803619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biparietal diameter: a useful measure for determining gestational age of human abortuses.
    Sailaja K; Ahuja RK; Gopinath G
    Natl Med J India; 1996; 9(4):165-7. PubMed ID: 8772333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of fetal, maternal and external factors on prediction of the day of delivery by the use of ultrasound.
    Tunón K; Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Feb; 11(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 9549835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.