125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38851965)
1. Mechanical and physical properties of splint materials for oral appliances produced by additive, subtractive and conventional manufacturing.
Maleki T; Meinen J; Coldea A; Reymus M; Edelhoff D; Stawarczyk B
Dent Mater; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38851965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing the mechanical properties of pressed, milled, and 3D-printed resins for occlusal devices.
Berli C; Thieringer FM; Sharma N; Müller JA; Dedem P; Fischer J; Rohr N
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):780-786. PubMed ID: 31955837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Water sorption, water solubility, degree of conversion, elastic indentation modulus, edge chipping resistance and flexural strength of 3D-printed denture base resins.
Greil V; Mayinger F; Reymus M; Stawarczyk B
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Jan; 137():105565. PubMed ID: 36401933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Occlusal Splint Materials.
Prpic V; Spehar F; Stajdohar D; Bjelica R; Cimic S; Par M
Dent J (Basel); 2023 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 37623295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of occlusal splint materials: CAD-CAM versus conventional resins.
Gibreel M; Perea-Lowery L; Vallittu PK; Lassila L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Dec; 124():104813. PubMed ID: 34530298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wear resistance and flexural properties of low force SLA- and DLP-printed splint materials in different printing orientations: An in vitro study.
Simeon P; Unkovskiy A; Saadat Sarmadi B; Nicic R; Koch PJ; Beuer F; Schmidt F
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Apr; 152():106458. PubMed ID: 38364445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of flexible three-dimensionally printed occlusal splint materials: An in vitro study.
Perea-Lowery L; Gibreel M; Garoushi S; Vallittu P; Lassila L
Dent Mater; 2023 Oct; 39(10):957-963. PubMed ID: 37666693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of printing orientation and artificial ageing on martens hardness and indentation modulus of 3D printed restorative resin materials.
Mudhaffer S; Althagafi R; Haider J; Satterthwaite J; Silikas N
Dent Mater; 2024 Jul; 40(7):1003-1014. PubMed ID: 38735775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro study on the influence of postpolymerization and aging on the Martens parameters of 3D-printed occlusal devices.
Reymus M; Stawarczyk B
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):817-823. PubMed ID: 32444206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of hardness and polishability of various occlusal splint materials.
Grymak A; Aarts JM; Ma S; Waddell JN; Choi JJE
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Mar; 115():104270. PubMed ID: 33341739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of various 3D printed and milled PAEK materials: Effect of printing direction and artificial aging on Martens parameters.
Prechtel A; Reymus M; Edelhoff D; Hickel R; Stawarczyk B
Dent Mater; 2020 Feb; 36(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 31785832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of Different Postpolymerization Strategies and Artificial Aging on Hardness of 3D-Printed Resin Materials: An In Vitro Study.
Reymus M; Stawarczyk B
Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(6):634-640. PubMed ID: 33284905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flexural properties and fatigue limit of 3D-printed and milled resin-based materials.
Sartori N; Sanchez SA; Oliveira D; Hosney S; Zoidis P; Martin W; Gonzaga L; Rocha MG
J Prosthodont; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38483093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of storage and toothbrush simulation on Martens hardness of CAD/CAM, hand-cast, thermoforming, and 3D-printed splint materials.
Rosentritt M; Hickl V; Rauch A; Schmidt M
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Dec; 27(12):7859-7869. PubMed ID: 37957307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of fracture strength, surface hardness, and color stain of conventionally fabricated, 3D printed, and CAD-CAM milled interim prosthodontic materials after thermocycling.
Yıldırım M; Aykent F; Özdoğan MS
J Adv Prosthodont; 2024 Apr; 16(2):115-125. PubMed ID: 38694194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Flexural Properties and Hardness of CAD-CAM Denture Base Materials.
Fouda SM; Gad MM; Abualsaud R; Ellakany P; AlRumaih HS; Khan SQ; Akhtar S; Al-Qarni FD; Al-Harbi FA
J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(4):318-324. PubMed ID: 35567362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture toughness, work of fracture, flexural strength and elastic modulus of 3D-printed denture base resins in two measurement environments after artificial aging.
Geiger V; Mayinger F; Hoffmann M; Reymus M; Stawarczyk B
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Feb; 150():106234. PubMed ID: 37995602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the mechanical properties and degree of conversion of 3D printed splint material.
Perea-Lowery L; Gibreel M; Vallittu PK; Lassila L
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Mar; 115():104254. PubMed ID: 33333480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temporary materials used in prosthodontics: The effect of composition, fabrication mode, and aging on mechanical properties.
Bergamo ETP; Campos TMB; Piza MMT; Gutierrez E; Lopes ACO; Witek L; Coelho PG; Celestrino M; Carvalho LF; Benalcázar Jalkh EB; Bonfante EA
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Sep; 133():105333. PubMed ID: 35839630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chemical and mechanical properties of dual-polymerizing core build-up materials.
Kelch M; Stawarczyk B; Mayinger F
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jul; 26(7):4885-4896. PubMed ID: 35344103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
