These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38852327)

  • 1. Limited impact of adding digital breast tomosynthesis to full field digital mammography in an elevated breast cancer risk population.
    Keupers M; Woussen S; Postema S; Westerlinck H; Houbrechts K; Marshall N; Wildiers H; Cockmartin L; Bosmans H; Van Ongeval C
    Eur J Radiol; 2024 Aug; 177():111540. PubMed ID: 38852327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screening Mammography Performance Metrics of 2D Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer.
    Chikarmane SA; Cochon LR; Khorasani R; Sahu S; Giess CS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Sep; 217(3):587-594. PubMed ID: 32966113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Potential Impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on the Benign Biopsy Rate in Women Recalled within the UK Breast Screening Programme.
    Sharma N; McMahon M; Haigh I; Chen Y; Dall BJG
    Radiology; 2019 May; 291(2):310-317. PubMed ID: 30888932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of percentage breast tissue density: comparison between digital mammography (2D full field digital mammography) and digital breast tomosynthesis according to different BI-RADS categories.
    Tagliafico AS; Tagliafico G; Cavagnetto F; Calabrese M; Houssami N
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 86(1031):20130255. PubMed ID: 24029631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency and Outcomes of BI-RADS Category 3 Assessments in Patients With a Personal History of Breast Cancer: Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Offit LR; Chikarmane SA; Lacson RC; Giess CS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Sep; 221(3):313-322. PubMed ID: 37095672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection and characterization of breast lesions in a selective diagnostic population: diagnostic accuracy study for comparison between one-view digital breast tomosynthesis and two-view full-field digital mammography.
    Chae EY; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150743. PubMed ID: 27072391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of breast cancers.
    Choi WJ; Kim HH; Lee SY; Chae EY; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Son BH; Ahn SH; Choi YW
    Breast Cancer; 2016 Nov; 23(6):886-892. PubMed ID: 26534858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Repeat Screening Outcomes with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Plus Synthetic Mammography for Breast Cancer Detection: Results from the Prospective Verona Pilot Study.
    Caumo F; Montemezzi S; Romanucci G; Brunelli S; Bricolo P; Cugola L; Gennaro G
    Radiology; 2021 Jan; 298(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 33170101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography in a Hybrid Screening Environment.
    Giess CS; Pourjabbar S; Ip IK; Lacson R; Alper E; Khorasani R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Oct; 209(4):929-934. PubMed ID: 28639832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Outcomes for One-View Asymmetries Recalled From Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography Screening Examinations.
    Gong AJ; Nguyen DL; Lee EE; Mullen LA; Myers KS; Oluyemi E; Ambinder EB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Nov; 219(5):724-733. PubMed ID: 35703412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic Efficacy of Synthesized 2D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Multi-ethnic Malaysian Population.
    Mumin NA; Rahmat K; Fadzli F; Ramli MT; Westerhout CJ; Ramli N; Rozalli FI; Ng KH
    Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):1459. PubMed ID: 30728394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening Mammography Findings From One Standard Projection Only in the Era of Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Cohen EO; Tso HH; Phalak KA; Mayo RC; Leung JWT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):445-451. PubMed ID: 29792742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of Screening Breast MRI After Negative Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus After Negative Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Women at Higher Than Average Risk for Breast Cancer.
    Roark AA; Dang PA; Niell BL; Halpern EF; Lehman CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Feb; 212(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 30540208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis with a wide scan angle compared to full-field digital mammography for the detection and characterization of microcalcifications.
    Clauser P; Nagl G; Helbich TH; Pinker-Domenig K; Weber M; Kapetas P; Bernathova M; Baltzer PAT
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Dec; 85(12):2161-2168. PubMed ID: 27842661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How long does it take to read a mammogram? Investigating the reading time of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography.
    J W Partridge G; Darker I; J James J; Satchithananda K; Sharma N; Valencia A; Teh W; Khan H; Muscat E; J Michell M; Chen Y
    Eur J Radiol; 2024 Aug; 177():111535. PubMed ID: 38852330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in ultrasonography-detected breast cancers.
    Nam KJ; Han BK; Ko ES; Choi JS; Ko EY; Jeong DW; Choo KS
    Breast; 2015 Oct; 24(5):649-55. PubMed ID: 26292782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Double reading of automated breast ultrasound with digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening.
    Lee JM; Partridge SC; Liao GJ; Hippe DS; Kim AE; Lee CI; Rahbar H; Scheel JR; Lehman CD
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():119-125. PubMed ID: 30807927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imaging characteristics of interval cancers detected on Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT).
    Majid SZ; Senapati GM; Lacson R; Chikarmane SA; Giess CS
    Clin Imaging; 2024 Mar; 107():110063. PubMed ID: 38232642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.