These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38852683)

  • 1. Effect of the number of passes on diagnostic performance of EUS fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chalhoub JM; Hawa F; Grantham T; Lester J; Carpenter ES; Mendoza-Ladd A; Wani S; Machicado JD
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38852683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
    Gkolfakis P; Crinò SF; Tziatzios G; Ramai D; Papaefthymiou A; Papanikolaou IS; Triantafyllou K; Arvanitakis M; Lisotti A; Fusaroli P; Mangiavillano B; Carrara S; Repici A; Hassan C; Facciorusso A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Jun; 95(6):1067-1077.e15. PubMed ID: 35124072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing per-pass performance of 2 types of needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of pancreatobiliary masses in a randomized trial.
    Mohamadnejad M; Mirzaie V; Sotoudeh M; Nikmanesh A; Hosseini R; Muthusamy R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 Sep; 98(3):371-380. PubMed ID: 37098399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Meta-Analysis Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration With Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Biopsy.
    Li Z; Liu W; Xu X; Li P
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2022 Sep; 56(8):668-678. PubMed ID: 35470294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A meta-analysis of endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration compared to endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle biopsy: diagnostic yield and the value of onsite cytopathological assessment.
    Khan MA; Grimm IS; Ali B; Nollan R; Tombazzi C; Ismail MK; Baron TH
    Endosc Int Open; 2017 May; 5(5):E363-E375. PubMed ID: 28497108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dry suction versus wet suction technique of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.
    Xu S; Wang J; Guo J; Xie F; Qiao W; Meng Y; Peng P; Hu H; Huang Y; Liu S; Qin M; Yao J; Li Y
    Trials; 2023 Dec; 24(1):805. PubMed ID: 38093381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endoscopic ultrasound with combined fine needle aspiration plus biopsy improves diagnostic yield in solid pancreatic masses.
    Gonzalez A; Wadhwa V; Singh H; Khan S; Gupta K; Liang H; Hussain I; Vargo J; Jang S; Chahal P; Bhatt A; Siddiki H; Erim T; Sanaka MR
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 May; 57(5):610-617. PubMed ID: 34991430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing the diagnostic adequacy of 25-Gauge fork-tip
    Haig A; John AS; Vaska K; Banh X; Huelsen A
    Endosc Ultrasound; 2024; 13(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 38947121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimal number of needle passes during EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions with 22G ProCore needles and different suction techniques: A randomized controlled trial.
    Zhou W; Li SY; Jiang H; Gao L; Li J; Kong XY; Yang L; Fang AQ; Jin ZD; Wang KX
    Endosc Ultrasound; 2021; 10(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 33586696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Franseen and fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid mass lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Mohan BP; Shakhatreh M; Garg R; Asokkumar R; Jayaraj M; Ponnada S; Navaneethan U; Adler DG
    Endosc Ultrasound; 2019; 8(6):382-391. PubMed ID: 31249163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative accuracy of needle sizes and designs for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Wani S; Triantafyllou K; Tziatzios G; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N; Singh S
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Dec; 90(6):893-903.e7. PubMed ID: 31310744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for genomic profiling and DNA yield in pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
    Kandel P; Nassar A; Gomez V; Raimondo M; Woodward TA; Crook JE; Fares NS; Wallace MB
    Endoscopy; 2021 Apr; 53(4):376-382. PubMed ID: 32767288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy with or without macroscopic on-site evaluation: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial.
    Mangiavillano B; Crinò SF; Facciorusso A; Di Matteo F; Barbera C; Larghi A; Rizzatti G; Carrara S; Spadaccini M; Auriemma F; Fabbri C; Binda C; Coluccio C; Marocchi G; Staiano T; Conti Bellocchi MC; Bernardoni L; Eusebi LH; Cirota GG; De Nucci G; Stigliano S; Manes G; Bonanno G; Ofosu A; Lamonaca L; Paduano D; Spatola F; Repici A
    Endoscopy; 2023 Feb; 55(2):129-137. PubMed ID: 36044915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy vs fine-needle aspiration for lymph nodes tissue acquisition: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Crinò SF; Gkolfakis P; Ramai D; Lisotti A; Papanikolaou IS; Mangiavillano B; Tarantino I; Anderloni A; Fabbri C; Triantafyllou K; Fusaroli P
    Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf); 2022; 10():goac062. PubMed ID: 36340808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tissue amount and diagnostic yield of a novel franseen EUS-FNB and a standard EUS-FNA needle-A randomized controlled study in solid pancreatic lesions.
    Kovacevic B; Toxværd A; Klausen P; Larsen MH; Grützmeier S; Detlefsen S; Karstensen JG; Brink L; Hassan H; Høgdall E; Vilmann P
    Endosc Ultrasound; 2023; 12(3):319-325. PubMed ID: 37693112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cohort study comparing the diagnostic yields of 2 different EUS fine-needle biopsy needles.
    Abdelfatah MM; Grimm IS; Gangarosa LM; Baron TH
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Feb; 87(2):495-500. PubMed ID: 28882575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition by 22-Gauge Franseen and Standard Needles for Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
    Ishigaki K; Nakai Y; Oyama H; Kanai S; Suzuki T; Nakamura T; Sato T; Hakuta R; Saito K; Saito T; Takahara N; Hamada T; Mizuno S; Kogure H; Tada M; Isayama H; Koike K
    Gut Liver; 2020 Nov; 14(6):817-825. PubMed ID: 32457276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
    Lee YN; Moon JH; Kim HK; Choi HJ; Choi MH; Kim DC; Lee TH; Cha SW; Cho YD; Park SH
    Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition by EUS-FNA versus EUS-FNB for solid pancreatic mass without ROSE: a retrospective study.
    Wong T; Pattarapuntakul T; Netinatsunton N; Ovartlarnporn B; Sottisuporn J; Chamroonkul N; Sripongpun P; Jandee S; Kaewdech A; Attasaranya S; Piratvisuth T
    World J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jun; 20(1):215. PubMed ID: 35751053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of tissue and molecular yield between fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA): a randomized study.
    Asokkumar R; Yung Ka C; Loh T; Kah Ling L; Gek San T; Ying H; Tan D; Khor C; Lim T; Soetikno R
    Endosc Int Open; 2019 Aug; 7(8):E955-E963. PubMed ID: 31367675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.