124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38852812)
21. Using Whole Slide Gray Value Map to Predict HER2 Expression and FISH Status in Breast Cancer.
Yao Q; Hou W; Wu K; Bai Y; Long M; Diao X; Jia L; Niu D; Li X
Cancers (Basel); 2022 Dec; 14(24):. PubMed ID: 36551720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Validation Study of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry Digital Imaging Analysis and its Correlation with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Fluorescence
Hartage R; Li AC; Hammond S; Parwani AV
J Pathol Inform; 2020; 11():2. PubMed ID: 32154039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Limited human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 discordance in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab, a population based study.
van Rooijen JM; de Munck L; de Graaf JC; Siesling S; de Vries EG; Boers JE
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Mar; 50(5):885-91. PubMed ID: 24491395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reliability of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry in breast core needle biopsies.
Lebeau A; Turzynski A; Braun S; Behrhof W; Fleige B; Schmitt WD; Grob TJ; Burkhardt L; Hölzel D; Jackisch C; Thomssen C; Müller V; Untch M
J Clin Oncol; 2010 Jul; 28(20):3264-70. PubMed ID: 20498397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization-based comparison between the Oracle HER2 Bond Immunohistochemical System, Dako HercepTest, and Vysis PathVysion HER2 FISH using both commercially validated and modified ASCO/CAP and United Kingdom HER2 IHC scoring guidelines.
O'Grady A; Allen D; Happerfield L; Johnson N; Provenzano E; Pinder SE; Tee L; Gu M; Kay EW
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2010 Dec; 18(6):489-93. PubMed ID: 20661132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Performance of HER2 DAKO HercepTest and Ventana 4B5 immunohistochemical assays on detecting HER2 gene-amplification in uterine serous carcinomas.
Navarro Sanchez JM; Finkelman BS; Tyburski H; Turner BM; Moisini I; Katerji H; Varghese S; Wang X; Schiffhauer LM; Chen JJ; Hicks DG; Zhang H
Hum Pathol; 2024 Jun; 148():51-59. PubMed ID: 38740270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Inter-observer reproducibility of HER2 immunohistochemical assessment and concordance with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH): pathologist assessment compared to quantitative image analysis.
Turashvili G; Leung S; Turbin D; Montgomery K; Gilks B; West R; Carrier M; Huntsman D; Aparicio S
BMC Cancer; 2009 May; 9():165. PubMed ID: 19476653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer.
Wolff AC; Somerfield MR; Dowsett M; Hammond MEH; Hayes DF; McShane LM; Saphner TJ; Spears PA; Allison KH
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2023 Sep; 147(9):993-1000. PubMed ID: 37303228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. HER2 testing in breast cancers: comparison of assays and interpretation using ASCO/CAP 2013 and 2018 guidelines.
McLemore LE; Albarracin CT; Gruschkus SK; Bassett RL; Wu Y; Dhamne S; Yim I; Lin K; Bedrosian I; Sneige N; Chen H
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 May; 187(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 33813685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Next-generation assessment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene (ERBB2) amplification status in invasive breast carcinoma: a focus on Group 4 by use of the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 testing guideline.
Hoda RS; Bowman AS; Zehir A; Razavi P; Brogi E; Ladanyi M; Arcila ME; Wen HY; Ross DS
Histopathology; 2021 Mar; 78(4):498-507. PubMed ID: 32841416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparing the 2017 ASCO/CAP guideline for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma surgical specimen to the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline for breast cancer in assessing the HER2 status in primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma.
Chao WR; Lee MY; Lee YJ; Sheu GT; Han CP
Virchows Arch; 2022 May; 480(5):1023-1030. PubMed ID: 35226147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Well-differentiated invasive breast cancers with equivocal HER2 immunohistochemistry: what is the yield of routine reflex in-situ hybridization testing?
Bethune GC; Pettit AS; Veldhuijzen van Zanten D; Barnes PJ
Histopathology; 2017 May; 70(6):966-974. PubMed ID: 28032917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Laboratory compliance with the American Society of Clinical Oncology/college of American Pathologists guidelines for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing: a College of American Pathologists survey of 757 laboratories.
Nakhleh RE; Grimm EE; Idowu MO; Souers RJ; Fitzgibbons PL
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 May; 134(5):728-34. PubMed ID: 20441503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update.
Wolff AC; Hammond ME; Hicks DG; Dowsett M; McShane LM; Allison KH; Allred DC; Bartlett JM; Bilous M; Fitzgibbons P; Hanna W; Jenkins RB; Mangu PB; Paik S; Perez EA; Press MF; Spears PA; Vance GH; Viale G; Hayes DF; ;
J Clin Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(31):3997-4013. PubMed ID: 24101045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Implications of the Updated 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Gene Testing Using Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Breast Cancer.
Lim TH; Lim AS; Thike AA; Tien SL; Tan PH
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Feb; 140(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 26910218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A qualitative study comparing the assay performance characteristics between the 2007 and the 2013 American Society for Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists HER2 scoring methods in mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer.
Chen CK; Lee MY; Lin WL; Wang YT; Han CP; Yu CP; Chao WR
Medicine (Baltimore); 2014 Dec; 93(27):e171. PubMed ID: 25501060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A new rabbit monoclonal antibody (4B5) for the immunohistochemical (IHC) determination of the HER2 status in breast cancer: comparison with CB11, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and interlaboratory reproducibility.
Powell WC; Hicks DG; Prescott N; Tarr SM; Laniauskas S; Williams T; Short S; Pettay J; Nagle RB; Dabbs DJ; Scott KM; Brown RW; Grogan T; Roche PC; Tubbs RR
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2007 Mar; 15(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 17536315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A Prospective, Multi-institutional, Pathologist-Based Assessment of 4 Immunohistochemistry Assays for PD-L1 Expression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Rimm DL; Han G; Taube JM; Yi ES; Bridge JA; Flieder DB; Homer R; West WW; Wu H; Roden AC; Fujimoto J; Yu H; Anders R; Kowalewski A; Rivard C; Rehman J; Batenchuk C; Burns V; Hirsch FR; Wistuba II
JAMA Oncol; 2017 Aug; 3(8):1051-1058. PubMed ID: 28278348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Gene protein detection platform--a comparison of a new human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 assay with conventional immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization platforms.
Stålhammar G; Farrajota P; Olsson A; Silva C; Hartman J; Elmberger G
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2015 Aug; 19(4):203-10. PubMed ID: 25921313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reproducibility of scoring criteria for HER2 immunohistochemistry in endometrial serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional interobserver agreement study.
Buza N; Euscher ED; Matias-Guiu X; McHenry A; Oliva E; Ordulu Z; Parra-Herran C; Rottmann D; Turner BM; Wong S; Hui P
Mod Pathol; 2021 Jun; 34(6):1194-1202. PubMed ID: 33536574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
