These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38852812)

  • 41. A Prospective, Multi-institutional, Pathologist-Based Assessment of 4 Immunohistochemistry Assays for PD-L1 Expression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
    Rimm DL; Han G; Taube JM; Yi ES; Bridge JA; Flieder DB; Homer R; West WW; Wu H; Roden AC; Fujimoto J; Yu H; Anders R; Kowalewski A; Rivard C; Rehman J; Batenchuk C; Burns V; Hirsch FR; Wistuba II
    JAMA Oncol; 2017 Aug; 3(8):1051-1058. PubMed ID: 28278348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Gene protein detection platform--a comparison of a new human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 assay with conventional immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization platforms.
    Stålhammar G; Farrajota P; Olsson A; Silva C; Hartman J; Elmberger G
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2015 Aug; 19(4):203-10. PubMed ID: 25921313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Reproducibility of scoring criteria for HER2 immunohistochemistry in endometrial serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional interobserver agreement study.
    Buza N; Euscher ED; Matias-Guiu X; McHenry A; Oliva E; Ordulu Z; Parra-Herran C; Rottmann D; Turner BM; Wong S; Hui P
    Mod Pathol; 2021 Jun; 34(6):1194-1202. PubMed ID: 33536574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Histologic analysis according to HER2 gene status in HER2 2 + invasive breast cancer: a study of 280 cases comparing ASCO/CAP 2013 and 2018 guideline recommendations.
    Hwang HW; Hong SA; Nam SJ; Kim SW; Lee JE; Yu JH; Lee SK; Cho SY; Cho EY
    Virchows Arch; 2022 Apr; 480(4):749-758. PubMed ID: 35138452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. HER2 testing in a population-based study of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with trastuzumab.
    O'Malley FP; Thomson T; Julian J; Have C; Cosby R; Gelmon K; Andrulis I; Whelan T
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2008 Jan; 132(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 18181675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Laboratory compliance with the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing guidelines: a 3-year comparison of validation procedures.
    Dyhdalo KS; Fitzgibbons PL; Goldsmith JD; Souers RJ; Nakhleh RE
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Jul; 138(7):876-84. PubMed ID: 24978913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of automated silver enhanced in situ hybridisation (SISH) and fluorescence ISH (FISH) for the validation of HER2 gene status in breast carcinoma according to the guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the College of American Pathologists.
    Dietel M; Ellis IO; Höfler H; Kreipe H; Moch H; Dankof A; Kölble K; Kristiansen G
    Virchows Arch; 2007 Jul; 451(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 17562074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A decision tree-based prediction model for fluorescence
    Yang L; Zhang Z; Li J; Chen M; Yang J; Fu J; Bu H; Tang S; Liu Y; Li H; Li X; Xu F; Teng X; Yang Y; Ma Y; Guo S; Wang J; Guo D
    J Cancer; 2018; 9(13):2327-2333. PubMed ID: 30026828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Implementation of American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 Guideline Recommendations in a tertiary care facility increases HER2 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization concordance and decreases the number of inconclusive cases.
    Middleton LP; Price KM; Puig P; Heydon LJ; Tarco E; Sneige N; Barr K; Deavers MT
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 May; 133(5):775-80. PubMed ID: 19415952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. HER2 double-equivocal breast cancer in Chinese patients: a high concordance of HER2 status between different blocks from the same tumor.
    Liu Y; Wu S; Shi X; Luo Y; Pang J; Wang C; Mao F; Liang Z; Zeng X
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Nov; 178(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 31388934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Assessment of HER2 using the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline update for invasive breast cancer: a critical look at cases classified as HER2 2+ by immunohistochemistry.
    Taylor VJ; Barnes PJ; Godwin SC; Bethune GC
    Virchows Arch; 2021 Jul; 479(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 33527151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Quantitative assessments and clinical outcomes in HER2 equivocal 2018 ASCO/CAP ISH group 4 breast cancer.
    Gupta S; Neumeister V; McGuire J; Song YS; Acs B; Ho K; Weidler J; Wong W; Rhees B; Bates M; Rimm DL; Bossuyt V
    NPJ Breast Cancer; 2019; 5():28. PubMed ID: 31482108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. High concordance between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization testing for HER2 status in breast cancer requires a normalized IHC scoring system.
    Gown AM; Goldstein LC; Barry TS; Kussick SJ; Kandalaft PL; Kim PM; Tse CC
    Mod Pathol; 2008 Oct; 21(10):1271-7. PubMed ID: 18487992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Silver in situ hybridization (SISH) for determination of HER2 gene status in breast carcinoma: comparison with FISH and assessment of interobserver reproducibility.
    Papouchado BG; Myles J; Lloyd RV; Stoler M; Oliveira AM; Downs-Kelly E; Morey A; Bilous M; Nagle R; Prescott N; Wang L; Dragovich L; McElhinny A; Garcia CF; Ranger-Moore J; Free H; Powell W; Loftus M; Pettay J; Gaire F; Roberts C; Dietel M; Roche P; Grogan T; Tubbs R
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Jun; 34(6):767-76. PubMed ID: 20421783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. HER2 in gastric cancer: comparative analysis of three different antibodies using whole-tissue sections and tissue microarrays.
    Abrahão-Machado LF; Jácome AA; Wohnrath DR; dos Santos JS; Carneseca EC; Fregnani JH; Scapulatempo-Neto C
    World J Gastroenterol; 2013 Oct; 19(38):6438-46. PubMed ID: 24151362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of breast cancer HER-2 receptor testing with immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization.
    Shanmugalingam A; Hitos K; Pathmanathan N; Edirimmane S; Hughes TM; Ngui NK
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Feb; 198(1):143-148. PubMed ID: 36604351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Assessment of HER2 status in breast cancer: overall positivity rate and accuracy by fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry in a single institution over 12 years: a quality control study.
    Varga Z; Noske A; Ramach C; Padberg B; Moch H
    BMC Cancer; 2013 Dec; 13():615. PubMed ID: 24377754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update.
    Wolff AC; Hammond ME; Hicks DG; Dowsett M; McShane LM; Allison KH; Allred DC; Bartlett JM; Bilous M; Fitzgibbons P; Hanna W; Jenkins RB; Mangu PB; Paik S; Perez EA; Press MF; Spears PA; Vance GH; Viale G; Hayes DF; ;
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Feb; 138(2):241-56. PubMed ID: 24099077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Impact of Modified 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines on HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer. One Year Experience.
    Varga Z; Noske A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140652. PubMed ID: 26473483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Toward standard HER2 testing of endometrial serous carcinoma: 4-year experience at a large academic center and recommendations for clinical practice.
    Buza N; English DP; Santin AD; Hui P
    Mod Pathol; 2013 Dec; 26(12):1605-12. PubMed ID: 23765245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.