These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38855347)

  • 1. Chapter 3: Setting the Hearing Aid Response and Verifying Signal Processing and Features in the Test Box.
    Palmer C; Zitelli L
    Semin Hear; 2024 May; 45(2):172-204. PubMed ID: 38855347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survey of Current Practice in the Fitting and Fine-Tuning of Common Signal-Processing Features in Hearing Aids for Adults.
    Anderson MC; Arehart KH; Souza PE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):118-124. PubMed ID: 29401059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chapter 5: Setting the Hearing Aid Response and Verifying Signal Processing and Features with Real-Ear Probe Microphone Measures.
    Zitelli L; Palmer C
    Semin Hear; 2024 May; 45(2):216-234. PubMed ID: 38855345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fitting Frequency-Lowering Signal Processing Applying the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Updates and Protocols.
    Scollie S; Glista D; Seto J; Dunn A; Schuett B; Hawkins M; Pourmand N; Parsa V
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):219-236. PubMed ID: 26967363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Telecoil-mode hearing aid compatibility performance requirements for wireless and cordless handsets: magnetic signal levels.
    Julstrom S; Kozma-Spytek L; Isabelle S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Sep; 22(8):515-27. PubMed ID: 22031676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Probe microphone measurements: 20 years of progress.
    Mueller HG
    Trends Amplif; 2001 Jun; 5(2):35-68. PubMed ID: 25425897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of an Over-the-Counter Self-fitting Hearing Aid Compared With an Audiologist-Fitted Hearing Aid: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    De Sousa KC; Manchaiah V; Moore DR; Graham MA; Swanepoel W
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Jun; 149(6):522-530. PubMed ID: 37052929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Personal amplification for school-age children with auditory processing disorders.
    Kuk F; Jackson A; Keenan D; Lau CC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):465-80. PubMed ID: 19253780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Telecoil-mode hearing aid compatibility performance requirements for wireless and cordless handsets: magnetic signal-to-noise.
    Julstrom S; Kozma-Spytek L; Isabelle S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Sep; 22(8):528-41. PubMed ID: 22031677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictability of speech-in-noise performance from real ear measures of directional hearing AIDS.
    Dhar S; Humes LE; Calandruccio L; Barlow NN; Hipskind N
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):147-58. PubMed ID: 15064660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fitting Noise Management Signal Processing Applying the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Verification Protocols.
    Scollie S; Levy C; Pourmand N; Abbasalipour P; Bagatto M; Richert F; Moodie S; Crukley J; Parsa V
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):237-251. PubMed ID: 26967364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Difference between the default telecoil (t-coil) and programmed microphone frequency response in behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aids.
    Putterman DB; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):366-78. PubMed ID: 22533979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using Objective Metrics to Measure Hearing Aid Performance.
    Kates JM; Arehart KH; Anderson MC; Kumar Muralimanohar R; Harvey LO
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(6):1165-1175. PubMed ID: 29554034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors ensuring consistent audibility in pediatric hearing aid fitting.
    Kuk F; Marcoux A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2002 Oct; 13(9):503-20. PubMed ID: 12416935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chapter 2: My Hearing Aid Isn't Working Like It Used to….
    Zitelli L; Palmer C
    Semin Hear; 2024 May; 45(2):153-171. PubMed ID: 38855342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Listener Performance with a Novel Hearing Aid Frequency Lowering Technique.
    Kirby BJ; Kopun JG; Spratford M; Mollak CM; Brennan MA; McCreery RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):810-822. PubMed ID: 28972470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The status of hearing aid technology from the audiologic viewpoint].
    Kiessling J
    HNO; 1988 Sep; 36(9):377-82. PubMed ID: 3049479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Difference in Speech Recognition between a Default and Programmed Telecoil Program.
    Ledda KT; Valente M; Oeding K; Kallogjeri D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jun; 30(6):502-515. PubMed ID: 30461405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.