These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38855347)

  • 21. Difference in Speech Recognition between a Default and Programmed Telecoil Program.
    Ledda KT; Valente M; Oeding K; Kallogjeri D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jun; 30(6):502-515. PubMed ID: 30461405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Preimplant Hearing Aid Fittings and Aided Audibility for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Nickerson A; Davidson LS; Uchanski RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Sep; 30(8):703-711. PubMed ID: 31044697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in adults in response to filtered speech stimuli.
    Carter L; Dillon H; Seymour J; Seeto M; Van Dun B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):807-22. PubMed ID: 24224988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Characteristics of hearing aid fittings in infants and young children.
    McCreery RW; Bentler RA; Roush PA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):701-10. PubMed ID: 23575463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of hearing aid microphone mode on performance in an auditory orienting task.
    Brimijoin WO; Whitmer WM; McShefferty D; Akeroyd MA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e204-12. PubMed ID: 25148290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction on Subcortical and Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials in Older Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Slugocki C; Kuk F; Korhonen P
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1282-1293. PubMed ID: 32058351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Right-Ear Advantage for Unaided and Aided Speech Perception in Noise in Older Adults.
    Behtani L; Fuente A; Ianiszewski A; Osman RA
    J Int Adv Otol; 2021 Mar; 17(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 33893780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing AIDS.
    Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):203-18. PubMed ID: 19194292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
    Boothroyd A
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Outcomes of Hearing Aid Use by Individuals with Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss (USNHL).
    Bishop CE; Hamadain E; Galster JA; Johnson MF; Spankovich C; Windmill I
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(10):941-949. PubMed ID: 29130442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Frequency-lowering processing to improve speech-in-noise intelligibility in patients with age-related hearing loss.
    Bruno R; Freni F; Portelli D; Alberti G; Gazia F; Meduri A; Galletti F; Galletti B
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Oct; 278(10):3697-3706. PubMed ID: 33083865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of hearing aids over the 20th century.
    Bentler RA; Duve MR
    Ear Hear; 2000 Dec; 21(6):625-39. PubMed ID: 11132788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Effects of FM and Hearing Aid Microphone Settings, FM Gain, and Ambient Noise Levels on SNR at the Tympanic Membrane.
    Norrix LW; Camarota K; Harris FP; Dean J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Feb; 27(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 26905531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Rehabilitation for high-frequency sensorineural hearing impairment in adults with the symphonix vibrant soundbridge: a comparative study.
    Uziel A; Mondain M; Hagen P; Dejean F; Doucet G
    Otol Neurotol; 2003 Sep; 24(5):775-83. PubMed ID: 14501456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Remote or in-clinic? The effect of service delivery mode on hearing aid output: study protocol for a double-blinded, randomised trial in adults with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lett C; Welch D; Dobson R
    Trials; 2024 Apr; 25(1):256. PubMed ID: 38610038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The contribution of a frequency-compression hearing aid to contralateral cochlear implant performance.
    Perreau AE; Bentler RA; Tyler RS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):105-20. PubMed ID: 23357804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.
    Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 24121648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of Directionality, Compression, and Working Memory on Speech Recognition.
    Rallapalli V; Ellis G; Souza P
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):492-505. PubMed ID: 33136708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Left Lateralization of the Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potential Reflects Aided Processing and Speech-in-Noise Performance of Older Listeners With a Hearing Loss.
    Slugocki C; Kuk F; Korhonen P
    Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):399-410. PubMed ID: 36331191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.