133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38857648)
1. Performance of restorations in primary molars over a seven-year period.
Pötter LA; Vollmer M; Santamaría RM; Splieth CH; Schmoeckel J
J Dent; 2024 Jun; 147():105121. PubMed ID: 38857648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth.
Innes NP; Ricketts D; Chong LY; Keightley AJ; Lamont T; Santamaria RM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Dec; 2015(12):CD005512. PubMed ID: 26718872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. WITHDRAWN: Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
Yengopal V; Harnekar SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 10(10):CD004483. PubMed ID: 27748505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are pediatric preformed zirconia crowns comparable to preformed metal crowns? A real-life retrospective study.
Shedeed O; Al Masri A; Splieth C; Pink C; Santamaria R
Quintessence Int; 2023 Sep; 54(8):630-639. PubMed ID: 37313578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Re-interventions after restoring teeth-Mining an insurance database.
Raedel M; Hartmann A; Priess HW; Bohm S; Samietz S; Konstantinidis I; Walter MH
J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():14-19. PubMed ID: 27889606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment success of carious primary molars with marginal breakdown: comparison of three treatment approaches in a real-world clinical setting (using decision tree analysis).
Basta A; Santamaría RM; Basta T; Alkilzy M; Splieth CH
Quintessence Int; 2023 Oct; 54(9):698-711. PubMed ID: 37497788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Success rates of preformed metal crowns placed with the modified and standard hall technique in a paediatric dentistry setting.
Midani R; Splieth CH; Mustafa Ali M; Schmoeckel J; Mourad SM; Santamaria RM
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2019 Sep; 29(5):550-556. PubMed ID: 30888708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the treatment outcomes of the conventional stainless steel crown restorations and the hall technique in the treatment of carious primary molars.
Ayedun OS; Oredugba FA; Sote EO
Niger J Clin Pract; 2021 Apr; 24(4):584-594. PubMed ID: 33851682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preformed pediatric zirconia crown versus preformed pediatric metal crown: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.
Lopez-Cazaux S; Aiem E; Velly AM; Muller-Bolla M
Trials; 2019 Aug; 20(1):530. PubMed ID: 31445509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Best-practice prevention alone or with conventional or biological caries management for 3- to 7-year-olds: the FiCTION three-arm RCT.
Maguire A; Clarkson JE; Douglas GV; Ryan V; Homer T; Marshman Z; McColl E; Wilson N; Vale L; Robertson M; Abouhajar A; Holmes RD; Freeman R; Chadwick B; Deery C; Wong F; Innes NP
Health Technol Assess; 2020 Jan; 24(1):1-174. PubMed ID: 31928611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root-filled teeth.
Sequeira-Byron P; Fedorowicz Z; Carter B; Nasser M; Alrowaili EF
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Sep; 2015(9):CD009109. PubMed ID: 26403154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth.
Rasines Alcaraz MG; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD005620. PubMed ID: 24683067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study.
Casagrande L; Seminario AT; Correa MB; Werle SB; Maltz M; Demarco FF; Araujo FB
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):847-855. PubMed ID: 27103587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent posterior teeth.
Worthington HV; Khangura S; Seal K; Mierzwinski-Urban M; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z; Rasines Alcaraz MG
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Aug; 8(8):CD005620. PubMed ID: 34387873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Managing molars with severe molar-incisor hypomineralization: A cost-effectiveness analysis within German healthcare.
Elhennawy K; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Manton DJ; Paris S; Schwendicke F
J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():65-71. PubMed ID: 28579384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness of fillings and stainless-steel pediatric crowns for primary molars restoration: the results of prospective randomized split mouth study.
Korolenkova MV; Arzumanyan AP
Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2019; 98(3):83-86. PubMed ID: 31322601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Hall Technique; a randomized controlled clinical trial of a novel method of managing carious primary molars in general dental practice: acceptability of the technique and outcomes at 23 months.
Innes NP; Evans DJ; Stirrups DR
BMC Oral Health; 2007 Dec; 7():18. PubMed ID: 18096042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report.
Gaengler P; Hoyer I; Montag R
J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 11570687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A practice based longevity study on single-unit crowns.
Collares K; Correa MB; Bronkhorst EM; Laske M; Huysmans MDNJM; Opdam NJ
J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74():43-48. PubMed ID: 29800638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
