These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38860057)

  • 21. The effects of listening environment and earphone style on preferred listening levels of normal hearing adults using an MP3 player.
    Hodgetts WE; Rieger JM; Szarko RA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):290-7. PubMed ID: 17485978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Headphones and other risk factors for hearing in young adults.
    Parsons J; Reed MB; Torre Iii P
    Noise Health; 2019; 21(100):116-124. PubMed ID: 32655065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Health Education Intervention on Hearing Health Risk Behaviors in College Students.
    Wang D; Li C; Wang Y; Wang S; Wu S; Zhang S; Xu L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Feb; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33562129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Feasibility of a Smartphone-Based Hearing Aid App for Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss: Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Jo S; Park MK; Seo JH; Lee KE; Han JS; Lim JH; Lee JH; Oh SH
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2023 Oct; 11():e46911. PubMed ID: 37800887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Occupational noise exposure and hearing loss of workers in two plants in eastern Saudi Arabia.
    Ahmed HO; Dennis JH; Badran O; Ismail M; Ballal SG; Ashoor A; Jerwood D
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Jul; 45(5):371-80. PubMed ID: 11418087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo after use of noise-canceling headphones.
    Dan-Goor E; Samra M
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2012; 33(3):364-6. PubMed ID: 21978648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Self-assessment of bone conduction hearing threshold using mobile audiometry: comparison with pure tone audiometry.
    Masalski M; Turski M; Zatoński T
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Jul; 63(7):535-542. PubMed ID: 37162277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of Smartphone Self-Hearing Test Applications Across Frequencies and Earphone Styles in Adults.
    Barczik J; Serpanos YC
    Am J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 27(4):570-580. PubMed ID: 30242342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Efficacy of active noise-canceling headphones in patients undergoing ultrasonic scaling.
    Kim JW; Lee BA; Park YS; Chung J; Choi SH; Kim YT
    J Periodontal Implant Sci; 2023 Aug; 53(4):269-282. PubMed ID: 36468488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Alternative headphones for patient noise protection and communication in PET-MR studies of the brain.
    Tellmann L; Herzog H; Boers F; Lerche C; Shah NJ
    EJNMMI Res; 2018 Dec; 8(1):106. PubMed ID: 30511194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Amplified music with headphones and its implications on hearing health in teens.
    Herrera S; Lacerda AB; Lürdes D; Rocha F; Alcaràs PA; Ribeiro LH
    Int Tinnitus J; 2016 Jul; 20(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 27488993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 3: test sensitivity for uncontrolled parameters in domestic usage.
    Leensen MC; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Oct; 52(10):658-69. PubMed ID: 23819619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Smartphone hearing screening with integrated quality control and data management.
    Swanepoel de W; Myburgh HC; Howe DM; Mahomed F; Eikelboom RH
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Dec; 53(12):841-9. PubMed ID: 24998412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Functional hearing in noise: insert earphones vs. supra-aural headphones.
    Ribera JE
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2007 Dec; 78(12):1159-61. PubMed ID: 18064922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Noise-induced hearing loss and the comprehension of speech in noise.
    Quist-Hanssen S; Thorud E; Aasand G
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1979; 360():90-5. PubMed ID: 287364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluating the hearing screening effectiveness of active noise cancellation technology among young adults: A pilot study.
    Cheng HL; Han JY; Chu YC; Cheng YF; Lin CM; Chiang MC; Wu SL; Lai YH; Liao WH
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2023 Jan; 86(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 36300992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Community-Based Hearing and Vision Screening in Schools in Low-Income Communities Using Mobile Health Technologies.
    Manus M; van der Linde J; Kuper H; Olinger R; Swanepoel W
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2021 Apr; 52(2):568-580. PubMed ID: 33497579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Automated screening for high-frequency hearing loss.
    Vlaming MS; MacKinnon RC; Jansen M; Moore DR
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):667-79. PubMed ID: 25127323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Objective and perceptual comparisons of two bluetooth hearing aid assistive devices.
    Clark JL; Pustejovsky C; Vanneste S
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Aug; 12(6):614-617. PubMed ID: 27377435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.