These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38861298)

  • 1. Evaluation of a Computer-Aided Clinical Decision Support System for Point-of-Care Use in Low-Resource Primary Care Settings: Acceptability Evaluation Study.
    Tegenaw GS; Sori DA; Teklemariam GK; Verbeke F; Cornelis J; Jansen B
    JMIR Hum Factors; 2024 Jun; 11():e47631. PubMed ID: 38861298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating a clinical decision support point of care instrument in low resource setting.
    Tegenaw GS; Amenu D; Ketema G; Verbeke F; Cornelis J; Jansen B
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2023 Mar; 23(1):51. PubMed ID: 36998074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinician acceptance of complex clinical decision support systems for treatment allocation of patients with chronic low back pain.
    Jansen-Kosterink S; van Velsen L; Cabrita M
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 Apr; 21(1):137. PubMed ID: 33906665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of computerised decision support systems on nursing and allied health professional performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review and user contextualisation.
    Thompson C; Mebrahtu T; Skyrme S; Bloor K; Andre D; Keenan AM; Ledward A; Yang H; Randell R
    Health Soc Care Deliv Res; 2023 Jun; ():1-85. PubMed ID: 37470324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A six-year repeated evaluation of computerized clinical decision support system user acceptability.
    Grout RW; Cheng ER; Carroll AE; Bauer NS; Downs SM
    Int J Med Inform; 2018 Apr; 112():74-81. PubMed ID: 29500025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved preventive care clinical decision-making efficiency: leveraging a point-of-care clinical decision support system.
    Laing S; Mercer J
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 Nov; 21(1):315. PubMed ID: 34763691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decision-support tools via mobile devices to improve quality of care in primary healthcare settings.
    Agarwal S; Glenton C; Tamrat T; Henschke N; Maayan N; Fønhus MS; Mehl GL; Lewin S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Jul; 7(7):CD012944. PubMed ID: 34314020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computerised decision support systems in order communication for diagnostic, screening or monitoring test ordering: systematic reviews of the effects and cost-effectiveness of systems.
    Main C; Moxham T; Wyatt JC; Kay J; Anderson R; Stein K
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Oct; 14(48):1-227. PubMed ID: 21034668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reasons For Physicians Not Adopting Clinical Decision Support Systems: Critical Analysis.
    Khairat S; Marc D; Crosby W; Al Sanousi A
    JMIR Med Inform; 2018 Apr; 6(2):e24. PubMed ID: 29669706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding technology adoption in clinical care: clinician adoption behavior of a point-of-care reminder system.
    Zheng K; Padman R; Johnson MP; Diamond HS
    Int J Med Inform; 2005 Aug; 74(7-8):535-43. PubMed ID: 16043083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acceptance, Barriers, and Facilitators to Implementing Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision Support Systems in Emergency Departments: Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation.
    Fujimori R; Liu K; Soeno S; Naraba H; Ogura K; Hara K; Sonoo T; Ogura T; Nakamura K; Goto T
    JMIR Form Res; 2022 Jun; 6(6):e36501. PubMed ID: 35699995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acceptance of clinical decision support surveillance technology in the clinical pharmacy.
    English D; Ankem K; English K
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2017 Mar; 42(2):135-152. PubMed ID: 26890621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and Implementation of a Decision Support System to Improve Control of Hypertension and Diabetes in a Resource-Constrained Area in Brazil: Mixed Methods Study.
    Marcolino MS; Oliveira JAQ; Cimini CCR; Maia JX; Pinto VSOA; Sá TQV; Amancio K; Coelho L; Ribeiro LB; Cardoso CS; Ribeiro AL
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jan; 23(1):e18872. PubMed ID: 33427686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of electronic medical record-based clinical decision support on HIV care in resource-constrained settings: a systematic review.
    Oluoch T; Santas X; Kwaro D; Were M; Biondich P; Bailey C; Abu-Hanna A; de Keizer N
    Int J Med Inform; 2012 Oct; 81(10):e83-92. PubMed ID: 22921485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation Framework for Successful Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Clinical Decision Support Systems: Mixed Methods Study.
    Ji M; Genchev GZ; Huang H; Xu T; Lu H; Yu G
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jun; 23(6):e25929. PubMed ID: 34076581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. "Quality of prenatal and maternal care: bridging the know-do gap" (QUALMAT study): an electronic clinical decision support system for rural Sub-Saharan Africa.
    Blank A; Prytherch H; Kaltschmidt J; Krings A; Sukums F; Mensah N; Zakane A; Loukanova S; Gustafsson LL; Sauerborn R; Haefeli WE
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2013 Apr; 13():44. PubMed ID: 23574764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A process model for quality in use evaluation of clinical decision support systems.
    Souza-Pereira L; Ouhbi S; Pombo N
    J Biomed Inform; 2021 Nov; 123():103917. PubMed ID: 34563692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring the feasibility of an artificial intelligence based clinical decision support system for cutaneous melanoma detection in primary care - a mixed method study.
    Helenason J; Ekström C; Falk M; Papachristou P
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 2024 Mar; 42(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 37982736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring the role of professional identity in the implementation of clinical decision support systems-a narrative review.
    Ackerhans S; Huynh T; Kaiser C; Schultz C
    Implement Sci; 2024 Feb; 19(1):11. PubMed ID: 38347525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Iterative Development and Evaluation of a Pharmacogenomic-Guided Clinical Decision Support System for Warfarin Dosing.
    Melton BL; Zillich AJ; Saleem J; Russ AL; Tisdale JE; Overholser BR
    Appl Clin Inform; 2016 Nov; 7(4):1088-1106. PubMed ID: 27878205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.