114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38862001)
1. Proton CT on biological phantoms for x-ray CT calibration in proton treatment planning.
Fogazzi E; Bruzzi M; D'Amato E; Farace P; Righetto R; Scaringella M; Scarpa M; Tommasino F; Civinini C
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Jun; 69(13):. PubMed ID: 38862001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Technical Note: CT calibration for proton treatment planning by cross-calibration with proton CT data.
Farace P; Tommasino F; Righetto R; Fracchiolla F; Scaringella M; Bruzzi M; Civinini C
Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):1349-1355. PubMed ID: 33382083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetric comparison of stopping power calibration with dual-energy CT and single-energy CT in proton therapy treatment planning.
Zhu J; Penfold SN
Med Phys; 2016 Jun; 43(6):2845-2854. PubMed ID: 27277033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Proton dose calculation based on converting dual-energy CT data to stopping power ratio (DEEDZ-SPR): a beam-hardening assessment.
Tanaka S; Noto Y; Utsunomiya S; Yoshimura T; Matsuura T; Saito M
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(23):235046. PubMed ID: 33336651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The INFN proton computed tomography system for relative stopping power measurements: calibration and verification.
Scaringella M; Bruzzi M; Farace P; Fogazzi E; Righetto R; Rit S; Tommasino F; Verroi E; Civinini C
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Jul; 68(15):. PubMed ID: 37379855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of an MR-based multimodal method for molecular composition and proton stopping power ratio determination using
Marants R; Tattenberg S; Scholey J; Kaza E; Miao X; Benkert T; Magneson O; Fischer J; Vinas L; Niepel K; Bortfeld T; Landry G; Parodi K; Verburg J; Sudhyadhom A
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Aug; 68(17):. PubMed ID: 37463589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Revisiting the single-energy CT calibration for proton therapy treatment planning: a critical look at the stoichiometric method.
Gomà C; Almeida IP; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(23):235011. PubMed ID: 30474618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Towards subpercentage uncertainty proton stopping-power mapping via dual-energy CT: Direct experimental validation and uncertainty analysis of a statistical iterative image reconstruction method.
Medrano M; Liu R; Zhao T; Webb T; Politte DG; Whiting BR; Liao R; Ge T; Porras-Chaverri MA; O'Sullivan JA; Williamson JF
Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1599-1618. PubMed ID: 35029302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of low-dose proton CT image registration for pretreatment alignment verification in reference to planning proton CT.
Cassetta R; Piersimoni P; Riboldi M; Giacometti V; Bashkirov V; Baroni G; Ordonez C; Coutrakon G; Schulte R
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 20(4):83-90. PubMed ID: 30933433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental comparison of relative stopping power evaluation between proton CT and x-ray CT for pre-clinical proton irradiation studies of small animals.
Terakawa A; Hosokawa H; Nogami M; Hitomi K; Ishii K
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Apr; 68(9):. PubMed ID: 37011626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of beam purity and scanner complexity on proton CT accuracy.
Piersimoni P; Ramos-Méndez J; Geoghegan T; Bashkirov VA; Schulte RW; Faddegon BA
Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):284-298. PubMed ID: 28066887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ex vivo validation of a stoichiometric dual energy CT proton stopping power ratio calibration.
Xie Y; Ainsley C; Yin L; Zou W; McDonough J; Solberg TD; Lin A; Teo BK
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Mar; 63(5):055016. PubMed ID: 29513647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of the INFN proton CT scanner for cross-calibration of x-ray CT.
Fogazzi E; Trevisan D; Farace P; Righetto R; Rit S; Scaringella M; Bruzzi M; Tommasino F; Civinini C
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Jun; 68(12):. PubMed ID: 37201529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Pre-clinical evaluation of dual-layer spectral computed tomography-based stopping power prediction for particle therapy planning at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center.
Faller FK; Mein S; Ackermann B; Debus J; Stiller W; Mairani A
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Apr; 65(9):095007. PubMed ID: 32028273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation of the use of DirectSPR images for proton planning in the RayStation treatment planning software.
Sarkar V; Paxton A; Su F; Price R; Nelson G; Szegedi M; James SS; Salter BJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 May; 24(5):e13900. PubMed ID: 36625438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stopping-power ratio estimation for proton radiotherapy using dual-energy computed tomography and prior-image constrained denoising.
Zimmerman J; Thor D; Poludniowski G
Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1481-1495. PubMed ID: 36322128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of beam-hardening corrections on proton relative stopping power estimates from single- and dual-energy CT.
Chacko MS; Wu D; Grewal HS; Sonnad JR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 23(9):e13711. PubMed ID: 35816460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Commissioning an in-room mobile CT for adaptive proton therapy with a compact proton system.
Oliver JA; Zeidan O; Meeks SL; Shah AP; Pukala J; Kelly P; Ramakrishna NR; Willoughby TR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):149-158. PubMed ID: 29682879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient-specific stopping power calibration for proton therapy planning based on single-detector proton radiography.
Doolan PJ; Testa M; Sharp G; Bentefour EH; Royle G; Lu HM
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Mar; 60(5):1901-17. PubMed ID: 25668437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Calibrated uncertainty estimation for interpretable proton computed tomography image correction using Bayesian deep learning.
Nomura Y; Tanaka S; Wang J; Shirato H; Shimizu S; Xing L
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):065029. PubMed ID: 33626513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
