These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38862357)

  • 21. A Review of Automated Bioacoustics and General Acoustics Classification Research.
    Mutanu L; Gohil J; Gupta K; Wagio P; Kotonya G
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(21):. PubMed ID: 36366061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Efficacy of extracting indices from large-scale acoustic recordings to monitor biodiversity.
    Buxton RT; McKenna MF; Clapp M; Meyer E; Stabenau E; Angeloni LM; Crooks K; Wittemyer G
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Oct; 32(5):1174-1184. PubMed ID: 29676813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A machine learning pipeline for classification of cetacean echolocation clicks in large underwater acoustic datasets.
    Frasier KE
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Dec; 17(12):e1009613. PubMed ID: 34860825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. ArcticBirdSounds: An open-access, multiyear, and detailed annotated dataset of bird songs and calls.
    Christin S; Chicoine C; O'Neill Sanger T; Guigueno MF; Hansen J; Lanctot RB; MacNearney D; Rausch J; Saalfeld ST; Schmidt NM; Smith PA; Woodard PF; Hervet É; Lecomte N
    Ecology; 2023 Jun; 104(6):e4047. PubMed ID: 37261395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Real-time bioacoustics monitoring and automated species identification.
    Aide TM; Corrada-Bravo C; Campos-Cerqueira M; Milan C; Vega G; Alvarez R
    PeerJ; 2013; 1():e103. PubMed ID: 23882441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Acoustic features as a tool to visualize and explore marine soundscapes: Applications illustrated using marine mammal passive acoustic monitoring datasets.
    Cominelli S; Bellin N; Brown CD; Rossi V; Lawson J
    Ecol Evol; 2024 Feb; 14(2):e10951. PubMed ID: 38384822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Automatic acoustic identification of individuals in multiple species: improving identification across recording conditions.
    Stowell D; Petrusková T; Šálek M; Linhart P
    J R Soc Interface; 2019 Apr; 16(153):20180940. PubMed ID: 30966953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An acoustic detection dataset of birds (Aves) in montane forests using a deep learning approach.
    Wu SH; Ko JC; Lin RS; Tsai WL; Chang HW
    Biodivers Data J; 2023; 11():e97811. PubMed ID: 38327353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Deploying Acoustic Detection Algorithms on Low-Cost, Open-Source Acoustic Sensors for Environmental Monitoring.
    Prince P; Hill A; Piña Covarrubias E; Doncaster P; Snaddon JL; Rogers A
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 30699950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A deafening silence: a lack of data and reproducibility in published bioacoustics research?
    Baker E; Vincent S
    Biodivers Data J; 2019; 7():e36783. PubMed ID: 31723333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hearing to the Unseen: AudioMoth and BirdNET as a Cheap and Easy Method for Monitoring Cryptic Bird Species.
    Bota G; Manzano-Rubio R; Catalán L; Gómez-Catasús J; Pérez-Granados C
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Aug; 23(16):. PubMed ID: 37631713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Decoding Group Vocalizations: The Acoustic Energy Distribution of Chorus Howls Is Useful to Determine Wolf Reproduction.
    Palacios V; López-Bao JV; Llaneza L; Fernández C; Font E
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0153858. PubMed ID: 27144887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. ANIMAL-SPOT enables animal-independent signal detection and classification using deep learning.
    Bergler C; Smeele SQ; Tyndel SA; Barnhill A; Ortiz ST; Kalan AK; Cheng RX; Brinkløv S; Osiecka AN; Tougaard J; Jakobsen F; Wahlberg M; Nöth E; Maier A; Klump BC
    Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21966. PubMed ID: 36535999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A dataset for benchmarking Neotropical anuran calls identification in passive acoustic monitoring.
    Cañas JS; Toro-Gómez MP; Sugai LSM; Benítez Restrepo HD; Rudas J; Posso Bautista B; Toledo LF; Dena S; Domingos AHR; de Souza FL; Neckel-Oliveira S; da Rosa A; Carvalho-Rocha V; Bernardy JV; Sugai JLMM; Dos Santos CE; Bastos RP; Llusia D; Ulloa JS
    Sci Data; 2023 Nov; 10(1):771. PubMed ID: 37932332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pairing a user-friendly machine-learning animal sound detector with passive acoustic surveys for occupancy modeling of an endangered primate.
    Wood CM; Barceinas Cruz A; Kahl S
    Am J Primatol; 2023 Aug; 85(8):e23507. PubMed ID: 37211970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. To Bag or Not to Bag? How AudioMoth-Based Passive Acoustic Monitoring Is Impacted by Protective Coverings.
    Osborne PE; Alvares-Sanches T; White PR
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Aug; 23(16):. PubMed ID: 37631823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Calling at the highway: The spatiotemporal constraint of road noise on Pacific chorus frog communication.
    Nelson DV; Klinck H; Carbaugh-Rutland A; Mathis CL; Morzillo AT; Garcia TS
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Jan; 7(1):429-440. PubMed ID: 28070305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Automated detection of dolphin whistles with convolutional networks and transfer learning.
    Nur Korkmaz B; Diamant R; Danino G; Testolin A
    Front Artif Intell; 2023; 6():1099022. PubMed ID: 36776422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Individual vocal signatures in barn owl nestlings: does individual recognition have an adaptive role in sibling vocal competition?
    Dreiss AN; Ruppli CA; Roulin A
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Jan; 27(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 24266879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.