These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38862376)
1. Does reusable mean green? Comparison of the environmental impact of reusable operating room bed covers and lift sheets versus single-use. Chang JH; Woo KP; Silva de Souza Lima Cano N; Bilec MM; Camhi M; Melnyk AI; Gross A; Walsh RM; Asfaw SH; Gordon IO; Miller BT Surgeon; 2024 Aug; 22(4):236-241. PubMed ID: 38862376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Environmental impact of single-use versus reusable gastroscopes. Pioche M; Pohl H; Cunha Neves JA; Laporte A; Mochet M; Rivory J; Grau R; Jacques J; Grinberg D; Boube M; Baddeley R; Cottinet PJ; Schaefer M; Rodríguez de Santiago E; Berger A; Gut; 2024 Oct; 73(11):1816-1822. PubMed ID: 39122363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Life Cycle Assessment and Costing Methods for Device Procurement: Comparing Reusable and Single-Use Disposable Laryngoscopes. Sherman JD; Raibley LA; Eckelman MJ Anesth Analg; 2018 Aug; 127(2):434-443. PubMed ID: 29324492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes. Davis NF; McGrath S; Quinlan M; Jack G; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):214-217. PubMed ID: 29373918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Environmental Impact of Flexible Cystoscopy: A Comparative Analysis Between Carbon Footprint of Isiris Jahrreiss V; Sarrot P; Davis NF; Somani B J Endourol; 2024 Apr; 38(4):386-394. PubMed ID: 38185843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Does Reusable Instrumentation for Four-Anchor Rotator Cuff Repair Offer Decreased Waste Disposal Costs and Lower Waste-Related Carbon Emissions? Pearson Z; Hung V; Agarwal A; Stehlik K; Harris A; Ahiarakwe U; Best MJ J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2024 Aug; 32(15):705-711. PubMed ID: 38861714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable and Disposable Surgical Caps. Donahue LM; Petit HJ; Thiel CL; Sullivan GA; Gulack BC; Shah AN J Surg Res; 2024 Jul; 299():112-119. PubMed ID: 38749314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Financial and environmental costs of reusable and single-use anaesthetic equipment. McGain F; Story D; Lim T; McAlister S Br J Anaesth; 2017 Jun; 118(6):862-869. PubMed ID: 28505289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Flexible Cystoscopes Compared with Reusable Cystoscopes. Hogan D; Rauf H; Kinnear N; Hennessey DB J Endourol; 2022 Nov; 36(11):1460-1464. PubMed ID: 35607858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Developing a carbon footprint model and environmental impact analysis of municipal solid waste transportation: A case study of Tehran, Iran. Rouhi K; Shafiepour Motlagh M; Dalir F J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2023 Dec; 73(12):890-901. PubMed ID: 37843987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact on life cycle carbon footprint of converting from disposable to reusable sharps containers in a large US hospital geographically distant from manufacturing and processing facilities. McPherson B; Sharip M; Grimmond T PeerJ; 2019; 7():e6204. PubMed ID: 30809428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative carbon footprint analysis of disposable and reusable vaginal specula. Donahue LM; Hilton S; Bell SG; Williams BC; Keoleian GA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):225.e1-225.e7. PubMed ID: 32067971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing the environmental impact of reusable and disposable dental examination kits: a life cycle assessment approach. Byrne D; Saget S; Davidson A; Haneef H; Abdeldaim T; Almudahkah A; Basquille N; Bergin AM; Prida J; Lyne A; Duane B Br Dent J; 2022 Aug; 233(4):317-325. PubMed ID: 36028697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of carbon footprint emissions and environmental concerns of solid waste treatment and disposal techniques; case study of Malaysia. Malakahmad A; Abualqumboz MS; Kutty SRM; Abunama TJ Waste Manag; 2017 Dec; 70():282-292. PubMed ID: 28935377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways. Eckelman M; Mosher M; Gonzalez A; Sherman J Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 22492190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact on carbon footprint: a life cycle assessment of disposable versus reusable sharps containers in a large US hospital. Grimmond T; Reiner S Waste Manag Res; 2012 Jun; 30(6):639-42. PubMed ID: 22627643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reusable scrub caps are cost-effective and help reduce the climate footprint of surgery. Agarwal D; Bharani T; Armand W; Slutzman JE; Mullen JT Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Sep; 408(1):358. PubMed ID: 37707671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A life cycle assessment of reusable and single-use central venous catheter insertion kits. McGain F; McAlister S; McGavin A; Story D Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1073-80. PubMed ID: 22492185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The green operating room: simple changes to reduce cost and our carbon footprint. Wormer BA; Augenstein VA; Carpenter CL; Burton PV; Yokeley WT; Prabhu AS; Harris B; Norton S; Klima DA; Lincourt AE; Heniford BT Am Surg; 2013 Jul; 79(7):666-71. PubMed ID: 23815997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]