These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38862376)

  • 21. A Cost and Waste-Savings Comparison Between Single-Use and Reusable Pulse Oximetry Sensors Across US Operating Rooms.
    Stockert EW; Carvalho B; Sun EC
    Anesth Analg; 2024 Jul; 139(1):220-225. PubMed ID: 38195082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Carbon footprint of different recovery options for the repulping reject from liquid packaging board waste treatment process.
    Khan MMH; Laitinen V; Havukainen J; Horttanainen M
    Waste Manag; 2021 Dec; 136():93-103. PubMed ID: 34653854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of reusable and disposable perioperative textiles: sustainability state-of-the-art 2012.
    Overcash M
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1055-66. PubMed ID: 22492184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. COVID-19 Solutions Are Climate Solutions: Lessons From Reusable Gowns.
    Baker N; Bromley-Dulfano R; Chan J; Gupta A; Herman L; Jain N; Taylor AL; Lu J; Pannu J; Patel L; Prunicki M
    Front Public Health; 2020; 8():590275. PubMed ID: 33330335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Carbon footprint associated with four disposal scenarios for urban pruning waste.
    Araújo YRV; de Góis ML; Junior LMC; Carvalho M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Jan; 25(2):1863-1868. PubMed ID: 29103114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reusable surgical headwear has a reduced carbon footprint and matches disposables regarding surgical site infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gumera A; Mil M; Hains L; Fanshaw SR; Dunne B
    J Hosp Infect; 2024 Oct; 152():164-172. PubMed ID: 39197751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable and Disposable Cystoscopes: A Path to Greener Urological Procedures.
    Baboudjian M; Pradere B; Martin N; Gondran-Tellier B; Angerri O; Boucheron T; Bastide C; Emiliani E; Misrai V; Breda A; Lechevallier E
    Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Jul; 9(4):681-687. PubMed ID: 36543725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cost and Environmental Impact of Disposable Flexible Cystoscopes Compared to Reusable Devices.
    Boucheron T; Lechevallier E; Gondran-Tellier B; Michel F; Bastide C; Martin N; Baboudjian M
    J Endourol; 2022 Oct; 36(10):1317-1321. PubMed ID: 35703325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How green is my reusable bronchoscope?
    Massart N; Millet C; Beloeil H; Fillatre P; Rouxel C; Daudin M; Coullier N; Marie V; Peguet E; Bardoult P
    Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med; 2024 Oct; 43(5):101420. PubMed ID: 39089450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.
    Landrigan PJ; Raps H; Cropper M; Bald C; Brunner M; Canonizado EM; Charles D; Chiles TC; Donohue MJ; Enck J; Fenichel P; Fleming LE; Ferrier-Pages C; Fordham R; Gozt A; Griffin C; Hahn ME; Haryanto B; Hixson R; Ianelli H; James BD; Kumar P; Laborde A; Law KL; Martin K; Mu J; Mulders Y; Mustapha A; Niu J; Pahl S; Park Y; Pedrotti ML; Pitt JA; Ruchirawat M; Seewoo BJ; Spring M; Stegeman JJ; Suk W; Symeonides C; Takada H; Thompson RC; Vicini A; Wang Z; Whitman E; Wirth D; Wolff M; Yousuf AK; Dunlop S
    Ann Glob Health; 2023; 89(1):23. PubMed ID: 36969097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Environmental impact of single-use and reusable flexible cystoscopes.
    Kemble JP; Winoker JS; Patel SH; Su ZT; Matlaga BR; Potretzke AM; Koo K
    BJU Int; 2023 May; 131(5):617-622. PubMed ID: 36515438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sustainable Purchasing Practices: A Comparison of Single-use and Reusable Pulse Oximeters in the Emergency Department.
    Duffy J; Slutzman JE; Thiel CL; Landes M
    West J Emerg Med; 2023 Nov; 24(6):1034-1042. PubMed ID: 38165184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Environmental impact of single-use, reusable, and mixed trocar systems used for laparoscopic cholecystectomies.
    Boberg L; Singh J; Montgomery A; Bentzer P
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0271601. PubMed ID: 35839237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Carbon footprint of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation.
    Ditac G; Cottinet PJ; Quyen Le M; Grinberg D; Duchateau J; Gardey K; Dulac A; Delinière A; Haddad C; Boussuge-Roze J; Sacher F; Jaïs P; Chevalier P; Bessière F
    Europace; 2023 Feb; 25(2):331-340. PubMed ID: 36107465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The carbon footprint of the operating room related to infection prevention measures: a scoping review.
    Bolten A; Kringos DS; Spijkerman IJB; Sperna Weiland NH
    J Hosp Infect; 2022 Oct; 128():64-73. PubMed ID: 35850380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Surgical waste audit of 5 total knee arthroplasties.
    Stall NM; Kagoma YK; Bondy JN; Naudie D
    Can J Surg; 2013 Apr; 56(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 23351497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Steps for reducing the carbon footprint of the operating room].
    Friedericy HJ; Sperna Weiland NH; van der Eijk AC; Jansen FW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2019 Oct; 163():. PubMed ID: 31647618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).
    Bogner J; Pipatti R; Hashimoto S; Diaz C; Mareckova K; Diaz L; Kjeldsen P; Monni S; Faaij A; Gao Q; Zhang T; Ahmed MA; Sutamihardja RT; Gregory R;
    Waste Manag Res; 2008 Feb; 26(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 18338699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Handling 'carbon footprint' in orthopaedics.
    Shah S; Morris H; Thiagarajah S; Gordon A; Sharma S; Haslam P; Garcia J; Ali F
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2024 Jul; 106(6):498-503. PubMed ID: 38563077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A systematic review comparing the safety, cost and carbon footprint of disposable and reusable laparoscopic devices.
    Chauvet P; Enguix A; Sautou V; Slim K
    J Visc Surg; 2024 Apr; 161(2S):25-31. PubMed ID: 38272757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.