127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38862664)
1. Optimization design of battery bracket for new energy vehicles based on 3D printing technology.
Zhang G; Li X; Li J; Zhou X; Zhou Y
Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):13461. PubMed ID: 38862664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed bracket transfer tray using an in-office indirect bonding system.
Yoo SH; Choi SH; Kim KM; Lee KJ; Kim YJ; Yu JH; Choi YI; Cha JY
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Jul; 162(1):93-102.e1. PubMed ID: 35772876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Topological Design of a Hinger Bracket Based on Additive Manufacturing.
Xie B; Wu X; Liu L; Zhang Y
Materials (Basel); 2023 May; 16(11):. PubMed ID: 37297194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Solid Stress-Distribution-Oriented Design and Topology Optimization of 3D-Printed Heterogeneous Lattice Structures with Light Weight and High Specific Rigidity.
Li B; Shen C
Polymers (Basel); 2022 Jul; 14(14):. PubMed ID: 35890584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of the design of 3D-printed indirect bonding trays and experience of the clinician on the accuracy of bracket placement.
Sabbagh H; Hoffmann L; Wichelhaus A; Kessler A
J Orofac Orthop; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38411719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative in vitro analysis of the sliding resistance of a modern 3D-printed polymer bracket in combination with different archwire types.
Hodecker L; Bourauel C; Braumann B; Kruse T; Christ H; Scharf S
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 May; 26(5):4049-4057. PubMed ID: 35092503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of Material and Pad Abrasion on Shear Bond Strength of 3D-Printed Orthodontic Brackets.
Hanson MS; Ontiveros JC; English JD; Wirthlin JO; Cozad BE; Harrington DA; Kasper FK
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Dec; 26 Suppl 1():171-179. PubMed ID: 37102401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of bracket position using thermoplastic and 3D-printed indirect bonding trays.
Shin SH; Lee KJ; Kim SJ; Yu HS; Kim KM; Hwang CJ; Cha JY
Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Jun; 24(2):133-145. PubMed ID: 34085499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of Individual Bracket Base Design on the Shear Bond Strength of In-Office 3D Printed Brackets-An In Vitro Study.
Hodecker LD; Scheurer M; Scharf S; Roser CJ; Fouda AM; Bourauel C; Lux CJ; Bauer CAJ
J Funct Biomater; 2023 May; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 37367253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of three-dimensional printing guides and double-layer guide plates in accurate bracket placement.
Zhang Y; Yang C; Li Y; Xia D; Shi T; Li C
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):127. PubMed ID: 32345292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of bracket bonding between two CAD/CAM guided bonding devices: GBD-U vs GBD-B.
Wang P; Li W; Li B; Han X; Bai D; Xue C
J Dent; 2023 Apr; 131():104456. PubMed ID: 36849067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accurate Bracket Placement with an Indirect Bonding Method Using Digitally Designed Transfer Models Printed in Different Orientations-An In Vitro Study.
Süpple J; von Glasenapp J; Hofmann E; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Koch PJ
J Clin Med; 2021 May; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 34066993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Design Optimization and Manufacturing of Bio-fixed tibial implants using 3D printing technology.
Guoqing Z; Junxin L; Chengguang Z; Juanjuan X; Xiaoyu Z; Anmin W
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 May; 117():104415. PubMed ID: 33652236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Two 3D-Printed Indirect Bonding (IDB) Tray Design Versions and Their Influence on the Transfer Accuracy.
von Glasenapp J; Hofmann E; Süpple J; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Koch PJ
J Clin Med; 2022 Feb; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 35268386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bracket transfer accuracy with two different three-dimensional printed transfer trays vs silicone transfer trays.
Hoffmann L; Sabbagh H; Wichelhaus A; Kessler A
Angle Orthod; 2022 May; 92(3):364-371. PubMed ID: 34982114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-Dimensional Digital Superimposition of Orthodontic Bracket Position by Using a Computer-Aided Transfer Jig System: An Accuracy Analysis.
Park JH; Choi JY; Oh SH; Kim SH
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Sep; 21(17):. PubMed ID: 34502801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Design of a patient-specific mandible reconstruction implant with dental prosthesis for metal 3D printing using integrated weighted topology optimization and finite element analysis.
Li CH; Wu CH; Lin CL
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 May; 105():103700. PubMed ID: 32279847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The design and processing of a 3D-printed high-performance biological fixation plate.
Guoqing Z; Junxin L; Xiaoyu Z; Yongsheng Z; Bai Y
Int J Bioprint; 2023; 9(2):658. PubMed ID: 37266033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Design of Personalized Cervical Fixation Orthosis Based on 3D Printing Technology.
Xu Y; Li X; Chang Y; Wang Y; Che L; Shi G; Niu X; Wang H; Li X; He Y; Pei B; Wei G
Appl Bionics Biomech; 2022; 2022():8243128. PubMed ID: 35535322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of additive manufacturing technologies and finish line designs on the trueness and dimensional stability of 3D-printed dies.
Lai YC; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jul; 32(6):519-526. PubMed ID: 35962924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
