142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38863089)
21. The use of patient specific polyetheretherketone implants for reconstruction of maxillofacial deformities.
Järvinen S; Suojanen J; Kormi E; Wilkman T; Kiukkonen A; Leikola J; Stoor P
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 47(7):1072-1076. PubMed ID: 31103433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Polyetheretherketone for long-term implantable devices.
Williams D
Med Device Technol; 2008; 19(1):8, 10-1. PubMed ID: 18348432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants.
Kurtz SM; Devine JN
Biomaterials; 2007 Nov; 28(32):4845-69. PubMed ID: 17686513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Interlocking polyetheretherketone implant.
Thomas M; Lee NJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Aug; 45(8):969-70. PubMed ID: 26972161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Tailoring the biologic responses of 3D printed PEEK medical implants by plasma functionalization.
Han X; Sharma N; Spintzyk S; Zhou Y; Xu Z; Thieringer FM; Rupp F
Dent Mater; 2022 Jul; 38(7):1083-1098. PubMed ID: 35562293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Part I: prospects for use in orthopaedics and traumatology].
Horák Z; Pokorný D; Fulín P; Slouf M; Jahoda D; Sosna A
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010; 77(6):463-9. PubMed ID: 21223825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Strategies to improve the performance of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as orthopedic implants: from surface modification to addition of bioactive materials.
Huang H; Liu X; Wang J; Suo M; Zhang J; Sun T; Wang H; Liu C; Li Z
J Mater Chem B; 2024 May; 12(19):4533-4552. PubMed ID: 38477504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of 3D-printed titanium-alloy, standard titanium-alloy, and PEEK interbody spacers in an ovine model.
Van Horn MR; Beard R; Wang W; Cunningham BW; Mullinix KP; Allall M; Bucklen BS
Spine J; 2021 Dec; 21(12):2097-2103. PubMed ID: 34029756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of printing path and material components on mechanical properties of 3D-printed polyether-ether-ketone/hydroxyapatite composites.
Zheng J; Kang J; Sun C; Yang C; Wang L; Li D
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Jun; 118():104475. PubMed ID: 33773239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. 3D printed porous PEEK created via fused filament fabrication for osteoconductive orthopaedic surfaces.
Spece H; Yu T; Law AW; Marcolongo M; Kurtz SM
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Sep; 109():103850. PubMed ID: 32543413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Optimization and manufacture of polyetheretherketone patient specific cranial implants by material extrusion - A clinical perspective.
Smith JA; Petersmann S; Arbeiter F; Schäfer U
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Aug; 144():105965. PubMed ID: 37343357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of Customized Alveolar Bone Augmentation Using Titanium Scaffolds vs Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Scaffolds: A Comparative Study Based on 3D Printing Technology.
Li L; Gao H; Wang C; Ji P; Huang Y; Wang C
ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2022 May; 8(5):2028-2039. PubMed ID: 35443132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for medical applications.
Panayotov IV; Orti V; Cuisinier F; Yachouh J
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2016 Jul; 27(7):118. PubMed ID: 27259708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Temporal Hollowing Augmentation With Polyetheretherketone Patient-Specific Implant.
Doh G; Eo S; Hong KY
J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 30(7):2131-2133. PubMed ID: 31107388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Current strategies to improve the bioactivity of PEEK.
Ma R; Tang T
Int J Mol Sci; 2014 Mar; 15(4):5426-45. PubMed ID: 24686515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Use of two-piece polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants in orbitozygomatic reconstruction.
Goodson ML; Farr D; Keith D; Banks RJ
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 50(3):268-9. PubMed ID: 21700371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Digital fabrication of polyetheretherketone retentive bar attachment inserts as overdenture maintenance: A dental technique.
Abdelaziz MS; Tella EAESAEM
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1034-1037. PubMed ID: 35606181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. One-Step Customized PEEK Cranioplasty After 3D Printed Resection Template Assisted Surgery for a Frontal Intraosseous Meningioma: A Case Report.
Barros A; Brauge D; QuÉhan R; Cavallier Z; Roux FE; Moyse E
Turk Neurosurg; 2021; 31(1):142-147. PubMed ID: 33372259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Custom design and biomechanical clinical trials of 3D-printed polyether ether ketone femoral shaft prosthesis.
Wu C; Zeng B; Deng J; Shen D; Wang X; Tan L; Liu X; Qiu G
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2022 Sep; 110(9):2006-2014. PubMed ID: 35297154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of cage subsidence in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: novel 3D-printed titanium versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage.
Adl Amini D; Okano I; Oezel L; Zhu J; Chiapparelli E; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
Eur Spine J; 2021 Aug; 30(8):2377-2384. PubMed ID: 34215921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
