154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38863985)
1. Observational studies: practical tips for avoiding common statistical pitfalls.
Sterrantino AF
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia; 2024 Jun; 25():100415. PubMed ID: 38863985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Design and statistical analysis of oral medicine studies: common pitfalls.
Baccaglini L; Shuster JJ; Cheng J; Theriaque DW; Schoenbach VJ; Tomar SL; Poole C
Oral Dis; 2010 Apr; 16(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 19874532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Avoiding pitfalls in conducting hand surgery research: the feasibility analysis.
Marks M; Broekstra DC
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2024 May; ():17531934241249907. PubMed ID: 38780053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Causal inference with observational data: the need for triangulation of evidence.
Hammerton G; Munafò MR
Psychol Med; 2021 Mar; 51(4):563-578. PubMed ID: 33682654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials.
Anglemyer A; Horvath HT; Bero L
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Apr; 2014(4):MR000034. PubMed ID: 24782322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tutorial: planning for data collection. Part II: Designing the study.
Plsek PE
Qual Manag Health Care; 1994; 2(4):73-81. PubMed ID: 10137610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Avoiding big data pitfalls.
Lamata P
Heart Metab; 2020; 82():33-35. PubMed ID: 33897312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Top ten errors of statistical analysis in observational studies for cancer research.
Carmona-Bayonas A; Jimenez-Fonseca P; Fernández-Somoano A; Álvarez-Manceñido F; Castañón E; Custodio A; de la Peña FA; Payo RM; Valiente LP
Clin Transl Oncol; 2018 Aug; 20(8):954-965. PubMed ID: 29218627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Seven Pervasive Statistical Flaws in Cognitive Training Interventions.
Moreau D; Kirk IJ; Waldie KE
Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():153. PubMed ID: 27148010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. STRengthening analytical thinking for observational studies: the STRATOS initiative.
Sauerbrei W; Abrahamowicz M; Altman DG; le Cessie S; Carpenter J;
Stat Med; 2014 Dec; 33(30):5413-32. PubMed ID: 25074480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Statistical methodology in oral and dental research: pitfalls and recommendations.
Hannigan A; Lynch CD
J Dent; 2013 May; 41(5):385-92. PubMed ID: 23459191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic review of education and practical guidance on regression modeling for medical researchers who lack a strong statistical background: Study protocol.
Bach P; Wallisch C; Klein N; Hafermann L; Sauerbrei W; Steyerberg EW; Heinze G; Rauch G;
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0241427. PubMed ID: 33347441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].
Amato L; Colais P; Davoli M; Ferroni E; Fusco D; Minozzi S; Moirano F; Sciattella P; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Perucci CA
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. PubMed ID: 23851286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Statistical errors in medical research - a review of common pitfalls.
Strasak AM; Zaman Q; Pfeiffer KP; Göbel G; Ulmer H
Swiss Med Wkly; 2007 Jan; 137(3-4):44-9. PubMed ID: 17299669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Issues in methodological research: perspectives from researchers and commissioners.
Lilford RJ; Richardson A; Stevens A; Fitzpatrick R; Edwards S; Rock F; Hutton JL
Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(8):1-57. PubMed ID: 11368832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Using Mendelian Randomization: The STROBE-MR Statement.
Skrivankova VW; Richmond RC; Woolf BAR; Yarmolinsky J; Davies NM; Swanson SA; VanderWeele TJ; Higgins JPT; Timpson NJ; Dimou N; Langenberg C; Golub RM; Loder EW; Gallo V; Tybjaerg-Hansen A; Davey Smith G; Egger M; Richards JB
JAMA; 2021 Oct; 326(16):1614-1621. PubMed ID: 34698778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How To Lie with Statistics and Figures.
Parks J; Yeh DD
Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2021 Aug; 22(6):611-619. PubMed ID: 34270365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Avoidable pitfalls in behavioral medicine outcome research.
Linden W; Satin JR
Ann Behav Med; 2007 Apr; 33(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 17447866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
